[dev] OOO300_m5/DEV300_m31 do not compile on Solaris
Hi! Since the OOO300_m5/DEV300_m31 the Buildbot Solaris build machines do not properly build these milestones. The build failes with the following error message: = Building module solenv Running processes: 1 /space1/termite/slavedir/Solaris-Intel/workdir/solenv ERROR! Could not detect compiler version! Please extend tg_compv.mk in force_dmake_to_error solenv/inc. ccache g++ -V returns g++: `-V' option must have argument dmake: Error code 1, while making 'compiler_version_error' Running processes: 0 The full logfiles can be found here: http://termite.go-oo.org/buildbot/builders/Solaris-Intel/builds/76/ As I am new to Solaris and the OOo build process, perhaps someone can help me out. Regards, Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] charter discussion ?
Hi, I know that this does not address the concerns regarding the discussion who's electable for the council but I also think that this is not the main point to get the CC to get the work done. From my experience from the last years in the CC I just can say that I'm not able to follow _and_ to work on all the stuff we had on the agenda, what I would like to do is either to judge and vote about well prepared proposals or to work in just one area for the CC. And having the proposals is the harder work to do. But sceptic as I am, I don't think that we'll find people for the all above proposed Offices. And I just don't think that the proposed changes alone in the charter for making more people electable for the CC makes the work in CC better. regarding the new draft of the charter (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Items/Charter_Proposal) there is a paragraph 4.1.1 Three “Code Contributor Representatives” Three persons who represent the developers who actively contribute source code t the OpenOffce.org code repository. They communicate concerns and proposals of individual as well as corporate code developers. Typically they should be members of the core projects of OpenOffice.org. From my perspective with active code contributor a people described, who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, meaning, being a doamin developer having commit access to the code, contributing code with the established child workspace processes and under the accepted term and conditions of the project (SCA, formerly known as JCA).Personally I would also expect that such described contributor also constantly takes over ownership of child workspaces. Is this something we can agree on as being an active code contributor for OpenOffice.org ? Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] charter discussion ?
Hi *, On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Hollmichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] regarding the new draft of the charter (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Items/Charter_Proposal) there is a paragraph 4.1.1 Three Code Contributor Representatives [...] From my perspective with active code contributor a people described, who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, [including SCA, cws-process] Is this something we can agree on as being an active code contributor for OpenOffice.org ? +1 from my part ciao Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] charter discussion ?
Hi, From my perspective with active code contributor a people described, who constantly contribute code to the project under the general rules of the project, [including SCA, cws-process] Is this something we can agree on as being an active code contributor for OpenOffice.org ? +1 Best regards Max - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
