[dev] Re: Commercial Break - Workshop "User Experience Done Live!"
Hi everyone! Although everyone loves the regular TV program, it seems that we require another commercial break to announce our UX workshop :-) After the initial announcement [1], a second blog posting [2], a status update by Frank [3] the current result is, that we don't have any official question to be worked on. I'd like to say "don't worry", since we have some ideas that are really interesting - but this is your workshop and therefore we want to address your questions and your activity! It's your chance to "mangle" the UX team... And now, please consider to improve your project and join our workshop [4]! There is nothing to lose ... except open questions. Cheers, Christoph PS: And some personal request - if you think that the workshop is "unacceptable" in any way, then please drop us a mail. You may answer on the official mailing lists or send us a personal message. Thank you! [1] http://uxopenofficeorg.blogspot.com/2009/10/commercial-break-workshop-user.html [2] http://uxopenofficeorg.blogspot.com/2009/10/cappuccinooo-and-more.html [3] http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/user_experience_project_at_ooocon [4] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/User_Experience_Done_Live Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 22:25 +0200 schrieb Christoph Noack: > Hi everyone, > > the User Experience Team currently prepares a workshop - which requires > your participation to make it a "real" workshop :-) > > > User Experience Done Live! > > Are you a developer in the context of OpenOffice.org? Great! Will you be > attending the OpenOffice.org Conference 2009 in Orvieto, Italy? Even > better! > > You and everyone interested in User Experience (UX) design are invited > to participate in this UX workshop. > > Bring your questions which have impact on usability to be worked on > "live" - supported by the members of the User Experience team. Together > we will identify potential issues and develop promising interaction > designs to even better satisfy your users' needs. > > Something for you? Please read on: > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/User_Experience_Done_Live > > > We'll be glad if you join! > > Christoph > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] I like to contribute
Hi, I like to contribute in developing, kindly add me... Thank you With Regards Raja Bose.
[dev] seeking info about writer ->html filter
Hello. I am inquiring about the (writer to html) filter in open office. Please direct me to the open office api references that pertain to this doc parsing and html-generation process. Thank you, Jeremy Donson jjdon...@gmail.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hello Eric, eric b schrieb: > Hi, > I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think > this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not > provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. > > Thanks in advance for the clarification There are more candidates asked for nominatiton than published at the lists. They are asked *before* publishing it to the lists. my 2 ct Mechtilde -- Dipl. Ing. Mechtilde Stehmann ## http://de.openoffice.org ## Ansprechpartnerin für die deutschsprachige QA ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows, Solaris ## Meine Seite http://www.mechtilde.de ## PGP encryption welcome! Key-ID: 0x53B3892B - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hi Eric, eric b wrote (31-10-2009 10:06) I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. All is well archived on the various mail lists. Pls don't worry: we won't forget you. Cor -- Cor Nouws - nl.OpenOffice.org marketing contact - Community Contributor Representative in the Community Council Gevoel niet vrij te zijn? Zie www.nieuwsteversie.nl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hi Eric, eric b schrieb: Hi Andre, Le 31 oct. 09 à 10:19, André Schnabel a écrit : I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. I don't get your point - really. Interested people already know the story, You always disagree with my point of view, I know, but that's not the point. I surely do not *always* disagree to your point of view. I fact I even often agreed and tried present your point to other people. The point is the process must respect people, and my feeling is, this is not the case. Sentences like you just wrote show deepest disrespect for other people (me in this case). But you are right to talk about a story, when I see how many time it took to organize these elections :-) Everybody is free to organize the elections - as long as she will follow the rules. The council is responsible to define the rules and make sure the rules are followed. This does not mean that council members need to do all the administrative tasks. Everybody is free to ask, if he can take this tasks. (I never saw anybody doing this - and the call for observers I once did, was only answered by two non-council-members.) Ok, I can accept thatnotmany peoplehave the timeto organizeand run elections. Anyway - it's nice to see, that you have the time to point to problems in the process (if your person is affected). André - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Re: [dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hi Andre, Le 31 oct. 09 à 10:19, André Schnabel a écrit : I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. I don't get your point - really. Interested people already know the story, You always disagree with my point of view, I know, but that's not the point. The point is the process must respect people, and my feeling is, this is not the case. But you are right to talk about a story, when I see how many time it took to organize these elections :-) Anyway, thanks for the explanation, and good luck to the new CC. Eric Bachard -- qɔᴉɹə
Re: [dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hi Eric, eric b schrieb: And in the list Louis published, I don't see I was nominated at all. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I see a difference between a nominee (can be proposed without being informed if not subscribed the right list) , and a candidate, who activaly accepted. There is a difference - yes, but for the election process this does not matter. You will not be on the list of candidates. (The nomination is just invalid.) The process proposal clearly states,that a candidate needs to agree to the nomination. In case he does not,it is the responsibility of the organization team to request this confirmation (as we did in case of Jürgen). You actively rejected - so it is clead that you do not want to be nominated. I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. I don't get your point - really. Interested people already know the story,as it was spread through a number of public mailing lists. André - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
[dev] Re: [council-discuss] election machinery (was Re: [council-discuss] Call for Nominations for Community Council Election)
Hi, just a question : In the first pahsis of the process, Alexandro Colorado nominateed me, for the Code representative seat. What I refused, for good personal reasons, i.e. I'm not candidate. And in the list Louis published, I don't see I was nominated at all. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I see a difference between a nominee (can be proposed without being informed if not subscribed the right list) , and a candidate, who activaly accepted. I think what will be retained is not what really happened, and I think this is not respecftull for Alexandro and me, and worse, does not provide a good image ot your 'elections process'. Thanks in advance for the clarification Eric Bachard Lead OpenOffice.org Education Project Le 31 oct. 09 à 09:54, Stefan Taxhet a écrit : Hi, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: On 2009-10-30, at 16:07 , Stefan Taxhet wrote: The 3 surveys are now ready to be started. I would like to create accounts and/or grant access for the observers and you so that you can follow the progress. Thanks. Go ahead and send a message to the lists notifying people that the 2 weeks voting period starts. Then I'll immediately initiate that voters get the invitations with the URL. But do we agree then that we must follow, for this election, the 2 week period? It is codified in the Process and so I'd say, yes. Let's go with the given timeframe. For observers there is always the chance to see whether the election is decided... But do the Council members agree? At least I do ;-) Greetings Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@council.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@council.openoffice.org -- qɔᴉɹə
