[dev] How is SCA after Oracle

2010-06-27 Thread Samphan Raruenrom

As Sun is now Oracle, what happen to the Sun Contributor Agreement?

1. For those who have signed the SCA, do we have to do it again?
2. For those who want to contribute, do we use the same SCA signing 
process and the same SCA document?


--
_/|\_ /Samphan Raruenrom./  Open Source Development Co., Ltd.
Tel: +66 2 2699889  Fax: +66 38 773128  Web: www.osdev.co.th 

Twitter: @osdev   Facebook: 
www.facebook.com/osdev 


Re: [dev] Buid OpenOffice 3.20 on Window

2010-06-27 Thread kanminru

>
>cf.
>http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=2191749
>With the help from the ML (dev@), I have been successfully built OOo, just
>for fun
>
>
Thanks for responding to me. I have fixed this problem. I just set: export
TMP=E:/Cygwin/tmp. Now my build is success. Thank for help me !







-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Buid-OpenOffice-3.20-on-Window-tp28981313p29004583.html
Sent from the openoffice - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org



[dev] Fwd: Project on Openoffice

2010-06-27 Thread inderjeet singh
Hello Sir,
I am trying to do some sort of experiment on open office in which i want
that oowriter can make both presentation and report by changing the style
sheets only.

also i want to do some programming by which i can adjust the amount of
contents that is to included in report
and to included in presentation means different in both cases. Also i want
to know more on paragraph height and conditional styles so that i can
include different contents in my report and presentation but using only and
only openoffice writer.
 --


-

-- 
With Regards,
INDERJEET SINGH

www.softwarelovers.co.cc

Creater:---Mr. INDERJEET SINGH


Re: [dev] Buid OpenOffice 3.20 on Window

2010-06-27 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:43 PM, kanminru  wrote:

>
> >
> >cf.
> >
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=2191749
> >With the help from the ML (dev@), I have been successfully built OOo,
> just
> >for fun
> >
> >
> Thanks for responding to me. I have fixed this problem. I just set: export
> TMP=E:/Cygwin/tmp. Now my build is success. Thank for help me !
>
>
Sounds great.


-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remo...@gmail.dot.com
, YIM: vuhung16 , Skype:
vuhung16plus
A brief profile: http://www.hn.is.uec.ac.jp/~vuhung/Nguyen.Vu.Hung.html


Re: [dev] Re: "FASTBOOL macro" vs "bool" - decrease memory usage

2010-06-27 Thread Terrence Enger
On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:03 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 25/06/2010 08:53, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > On 06/24/10 22:51, Terrence Enger wrote:
> >> This is about a sal_Bool rather than a bool, but I shall raise
> >> the question anyway.
> >>
> >> It just happens that I was running OO under gdb, and the
> >> following output had already caught my attention.
> >>
> >> Breakpoint 1, connectivity::OSkipDeletedSet::moveAbsolute
(this=0xa85faa14, _nPos=1, _bRetrieveData=244 'ô')
at 
/home/terry/OOo_hacking/DEV300_m83/connectivity/source/commontools/TSkipDeletedSet.cxx:170
> >> 170sal_Bool OSkipDeletedSet::moveAbsolute(sal_Int32
_nPos,sal_Bool _bRetrieveData
> >>
> >> Is the funny value of _bRetrieveData sufficient grounds to create
> >> an issue?
> > 
> > Technically, it should be OK; a sal_Bool value == 0 represents
false, 
> > while anything != 0 represents true.  However, using anything but
0/1 is 
> > error-prone and probably dubious, so looking into it would
definitely be 
> > worthwhile.  (There is a slim chance that this is caused by
compiler 
> > optimizations and is thus harmless, or that gdb displays garbage
instead 
> > of the true function arguments, but the values for this and _nPos
look 
> > reasonable enough to let you assume that the value for
_bRetrieveData is 
> > correct also.)
> 
> well, the last time i found something like this it was just plain
> uninitialized memory.  i guess somebody should investigate where the
value
> came from.
> 
> 

I looked further, and I see ...

(1) At breakpoint on first definition line of the function
(TSkipDeletedSet.cxx:170), gdb shows funny values or
_bRetrieveData, most recently 176.

(2) After I do gdb "next", so that line 173 is ready for
execution, gdb shows _bRetrieveData has value 1.

(3) If I set a breakpoint by function name on
connectivity::OSkipDeletedSet::moveAboslute, gdb reports the
breakpoint set on line 173.  At the break point, gdb has
shown _bRetrieveData with value 1 several time in succession.


Just a funny in gdb, I guess.

Thank you for your help.

Terry.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [dev] How to run quickstarter?

2010-06-27 Thread Terrence Enger
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 10:44 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/23/10 19:56, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Sunday 23 May 2010, 14:15, Terrence Enger wrote:
> >> Uh oh.  This time my attempt to install "only for me" displays a
> >> message box, give or take my retyping, ...
> >>
> >> loading component library failed:
> >>
> >>
file:///home/terry/OOo_hacking/localbuild/openoffice.org3/program/../.open
> >>
office.org/3/user/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages/giOaFu_/QuickStartFixer_L
> >> inux_x86.oxt/Linux_x86/QuickStartFixer.uno.so
> >>
> >> and trying to install "for all users" gives a superficially
> >> similar message.  The named file exists, permissions -rw-r--r--,
> >> 282635 bytes.
> >>
> >> I am sorry to be a nuisance.  Any further suggestions?  I have a
> >> non-product build with debugging symbols, in case that suggests
> >> any way I can help.
> > 
> > quite strange... it builds (with the OOo SDK build env.) fine and
also works 
> > for me on Fedora and Ubuntu (32 and 64 bits). 
> 
> Most probably due to libstlport_gcc.so vs. libstlport_gcc_stldebug.so 
> mismatch due to product/non-product mismatch.
> 

That sounds like a plausible explanation.

I now have a non-product build of DEV300_m83 without any local
modifications.  It runs the quickstarter the first time I run
after installation.

The assertions I reported earlier are in abeyance.  I shall go
off now to resolve issue 111452.

Thank you for your help.

Terry.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org



Re: [dev] How to run quickstarter?

2010-06-27 Thread Terrence Enger
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 15:12 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
> 
> The assertions I reported earlier are in abeyance.  I shall go
> off now to resolve issue 111452.

Uh oh.  I mean I am going off to resolve issue 110623 as a
duplicate of 111452, which is fixed

Cheers,
Terry.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org