[dev] Update: Removing external header guards
Hi, as the license change for 3.0 will touch ~every file anyway, we decided it to be advantageous to do that jointly with the incguards removal. Both is currently happening in CWS changefileheader. > Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb: >> I'm all in for somebody else doing work :), and I do not doubt that it >> is *reasonable* to remove external include guards /in general/. >> I only suspect that the minor gain we get from this is not worth the >> potential medium or big pain it will cause. > Frank, are your objections still valid? Currently, I plan to leave the following modules out: - external stuff - binfilter - dbaccess Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
Hi Thorsten, >> Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany schrieb: >>> I'm all in for somebody else doing work :), and I do not doubt that it >>> is *reasonable* to remove external include guards /in general/. >>> I only suspect that the minor gain we get from this is not worth the >>> potential medium or big pain it will cause. > Frank, are your objections still valid? I still hope to be wrong in assuming that this will cost us a lot of work in resyncing, but well ... My CWS which did the most changes in this area is meanwhile integrated, the other open CWS'es don't touch that much of the includes, so go ahead Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:53:21PM +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > I still hope to be wrong in assuming that this will cost us a lot of > work in resyncing, but well ... My CWS which did the most changes in > this area is meanwhile integrated, the other open CWS'es don't touch > that much of the includes, so go ahead > With dbaccess as well? -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
Hi Thorsten, > With dbaccess as well? Yes. Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
Thorsten Behrens wrote: Hi, as the license change for 3.0 will touch ~every file anyway, we decided it to be advantageous to do that jointly with the incguards removal. Both is currently happening in CWS changefileheader. Hi Thorsten, Is your tooling defective? Why is the external header around rtl/string.hxx not removed below? -Stephan File [changed]: exceptiontree.hxx Url: http://udk.openoffice.org/source/browse/udk/codemaker/inc/codemaker/exceptiontree.hxx?r1=1.7.48.1&r2=1.7.48.2 Delta lines: +2 -4 --- --- exceptiontree.hxx 2008-03-31 07:22:51+1.7.48.1 +++ exceptiontree.hxx 2008-04-01 12:26:07+1.7.48.2 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ * OpenOffice.org - a multi-platform office productivity suite * * $RCSfile: exceptiontree.hxx,v $ - * $Revision: 1.7.48.1 $ + * $Revision: 1.7.48.2 $ * * This file is part of OpenOffice.org. * @@ -31,9 +31,7 @@ #ifndef INCLUDED_CODEMAKER_EXCEPTIONTREE_HXX #define INCLUDED_CODEMAKER_EXCEPTIONTREE_HXX -#ifndef INCLUDED_CODEMAKER_GLOBAL_HXX #include "codemaker/global.hxx" -#endif #ifndef _RTL_STRING_HXX_ #include "rtl/string.hxx" #endif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:21:01PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Is your tooling defective? Why is the external header around > rtl/string.hxx not removed below? > Nope. The script first collects all headers, extracts the header guards from it, and then removes those guards in all files where they externally guard the corresponding include statements. Following from that, - typos are not removed - headers that are not visible to the script are not considered at all Your case fits in the latter category (I've been a bit conservative in the first strip run). There will be more changes, am currently trying to capture the most prominent typos as well. Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > as the license change for 3.0 will touch ~every file anyway, we > decided it to be advantageous to do that jointly with the incguards > removal. Both is currently happening in CWS changefileheader. > Done with the first two rounds of guard removals. Linux builds cleanly, I'm currently doing Win32 & Aqua builds. There's been quite some (semi-)manual work needed, as the script only removes _correct_ header guards (i.e. where the macro name in the header matches that at the inclusion place) - I surely did not remove every instance of those misspelled cases. So, if someone (in Hamburg, preferrably, as R"udiger will have checkouts readily available) wants to have a look at his or her project and remove some more bogus guards, I'd say _now_ is the time - please coordinate with R"udiger, we want to provide install sets ASAP. Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Done with the first two rounds of guard removals. Linux builds > cleanly, I'm currently doing Win32 & Aqua builds. > Win32 & Aqua now clean as well. Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
Thorsten Behrens wrote: On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:21:01PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Is your tooling defective? Why is the external header around rtl/string.hxx not removed below? Nope. The script first collects all headers, extracts the header guards from it, and then removes those guards in all files where they externally guard the corresponding include statements. Following from that, - typos are not removed - headers that are not visible to the script are not considered at all Your case fits in the latter category (I've been a bit conservative in the first strip run). But why is rtl/string.hxx "not visible to the script"? Do occurences of external guards around including rtl/string.hxx (and others?) need to be removed manually? -Stephan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 09:16:21AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > But why is rtl/string.hxx "not visible to the script"? > > Do occurences of external guards around including rtl/string.hxx (and > others?) need to be removed manually? > No. Please check the file again. ;-) Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Update: Removing external header guards
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:53:21PM +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > I still hope to be wrong in assuming that this will cost us a lot of > work in resyncing, but well ... > Hi Frank, all, well, now is the time to check - DEV300_m7 should be almost clean from external header guards. Cheers, -- Thorsten - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
