Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669$ should this be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43826694 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669 or sth. else? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3147878 This is the changeset. Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
2009/11/18 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com: On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669$ should this be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43826694 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669 or sth. else? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3147878 This is the changeset. I'll revert it. / Grant ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
On 18 Nov 2009, at 07:17, marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: I just selected multiple ways of a long road in the correct order in potlatch and clicked to add them to a new relation. For your information, Potlatch does not allow the selecting of multiple ways. Shift clicking ways joins them together. What you can do is select one way set the relation, then click the next way and shift click the relation button to add the last relation that has been used to the way or node. Richard: The tags don't match message should probably have something about ways being merged prepended. Shaun ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:05:02 -0800, Stellan Lagerstrom lagerst...@blindsight.com wrote: marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: I just selected multiple ways of a long road in the correct order in potlatch and clicked to add them to a new relation. As you may have discovered, that is not how Potlatch works. You *cannot* select more than one road at a time. Shift-clicking joins roads. Yes, I know that now. I found that behavior not only counter-intuitive but outright dangerous. Visual feedback is exactly as one would expect, nothing to point out that it has joined the ways, no warning that the ways do not even have identical tags,... Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:38:04 +, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: 2009/11/18 Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com: 2009/11/18 marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com: On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:29:29 +0100, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669$ should this be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/43826694 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4382669 or sth. else? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3147878 This is the changeset. I'll revert it. Done. Thanks. :) I created the missing relation again, this time selecting only 1 way at a time and it worked. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/331137 Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Reference .osm for render testing?
Great - I was searching for something like this! many thanks Michael On 17.11.2009, at 12:05, Patrick Petschge Kilian wrote: Hi, Is there an artificial reference .osm available, which shows different rendering scenarios? Especially for those building a rendering engine, it could be useful to have a simple OSM, which just contains all OSM map-feature, special cases (like multipolygons with holes, streets above another, ...) and a reference rendering (e.g. Mapnik, Osmarender) - as otherwise we have to hunt for special regions on the whole world.osm. Osmarender has some test data which come close. You can look at them at: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/rendering/osmarender/testdata The file named comprehensive.osm probably comes closest to what you want. I'm not aware of the availability of rendered images of those datafile. Neither for osmarender nor for mapnik. HTH and HAND, Patrick Petschge Kilian ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: I found that behavior not only counter-intuitive but outright dangerous. Visual feedback is exactly as one would expect, nothing to point out that it has joined the ways, no warning that the ways do not even have identical tags,... The warning only appears if the tags are conflicting, that is, if the same tag has different values on the two ways. Not if a tag is on only one way. In the case of a road with a bridge, this was usually one way that was split to insert the bridge, so they have identical tags... no warning. The combined result gets bridge and layer tags. /Stellan ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] 401 after PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Karl Guggisberg karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch wrote: Hi A JOSM user reported a 401 status message after a PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3887#comment:7 Why is it doing a PUT http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/29495765? It should be doing a GET here as it´s downloading, not uploading. Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] 401 after PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id?
I think it's this call, not the GET equivalent http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Update:_PUT_.2Fapi.2F0.6.2F.5Bnode.7Cway.7Crelation.5D.2F.23id Regards Karl -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Marcus Wolschon [mailto:marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. November 2009 19:27 An: karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch Cc: dev@openstreetmap.org Betreff: Re: [OSM-dev] 401 after PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id? On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Karl Guggisberg karl.guggisb...@guggis.ch wrote: Hi A JOSM user reported a 401 status message after a PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3887#comment:7 Why is it doing a PUT http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/29495765? It should be doing a GET here as it´s downloading, not uploading. Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] 401 after PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id?
On 18/11/09 18:17, Karl Guggisberg wrote: A JOSM user reported a 401 status message after a PUT /api/0.6/[node|way|relation]/#id, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/3887#comment:7 (see his JOSM logs). Under what conditions is the OSM server replying a 401 after an object update? When the request does not provide valid authentication details. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] Mapink others - Sea, region, state, county rendering?
Could devlopers make Mapink to render sea names, region names, county rendering? I see there are nodes with names, but AFAIK no noline renderer supports them. It would be good that it can render those name depending on size of area it takes. For example Pacific ocean (very large) ; Black Sea (smaller), Ioninian sea (small). Label visibility should depend on size. Also this could apply on states, regions, counties. Look at Switzerland on lower zoom levels it's a mess on Mapink, swiss kanton names are everywhere. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] [PATCH] wiki.openstreetmap.org looks crappy in webkit (Chrome et al)
On 19/11/09 00:00, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: The OSM wiki looks bad in recent webkit-based browsers due to an outdated KHTML hack in MediaWiki, to fix it delete: phase3/skins/monobook/KHTMLFixes.css And apply this patch: http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/phase3/skins/common/wikibits.js?r1=53141r2=53140pathrev=53141diff_format=u Our mediawiki install should be updated to the latest version in the fairly near future, which I assume will fix this? Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://www.compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
Marcus Wolschon wrote: I found that behavior not only counter-intuitive but outright dangerous. Visual feedback is exactly as one would expect, nothing to point out that it has joined the ways, no warning that the ways do not even have identical tags,... ...no chance that users might actually read some documentation? No, of course not. Silly me. I've moved it from shift-click to command-click (or control-click for those of you with inferior systems :p ), which is something I've been thinking about doing for a while. Someone else can fix the documentation because, well, I could do with some sleep. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/potlatch-breaking-B38a-tp26403528p26419648.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] potlatch breaking B38a
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Marcus Wolschon wrote: ...no chance that users might actually read some documentation? No, of course not. Silly me. We`ve all been spoiled by WindowsCo just expecting ctrl+c to copy, enter to push a button that has focus, alt to get to the menu, ... Seriously, noone reads documentation that comes with graphical software unless there is a feature the user knows exists but can´t get to work. Where is the sourcecode for potlatch and what is needed to compile it? I may try to add a singe ways merges, press z to undo like the message it displayes after deleting something. Marcus ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
