Re: [OSM-dev] Nominatim Installation problem - nominatim.xml not found
OK, I got it from nominatim/lib/template/searchhtml.php Thnks All 2012/1/31 Anwar Azulfa > Anyone know where is html template of nominatim index ? > I want to modify html template of it > > Thnks > > > 2012/1/30 Anwar Azulfa > >> Thanks Sarah, >> >> Now my www.osmosa.net/search is works :) >> >> >> How about if i want to add input box (search box) on my main map, >> www.osmosa.net >> Because on www.osmosa.net there is no search box. >> >> How to do that ? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> 2012/1/30 Sarah Hoffmann >> >>> Hi Anwar, >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:58:47AM +0700, Anwar Azulfa wrote: >>> > Hi All, >>> > >>> > Long time no continue this project,i have follow instruction from >>> > http://open.mapquestapi.com/npi/ >>> > >>> > Now i have finished imported index file and generate web. >>> > But when i try to query, error happen.I don't know what's that but >>> there is >>> > "permission denied" message. >>> > >>> > Let see on >>> > >>> > >>> http://www.osmosa.net/search/search.php?q=jakarta&viewbox=-140.89%2C64.68%2C-20.83%2C31.75 >>> > >>> > >>> > What should i do ? >>> >>> Two things: first of all, in settings/settings.php you need to adapt >>> the base URL for your server. Find the line with CONST_Website_BaseURL >>> and set it to http://www.osmosa.net/search/. Second, you need to make >>> sure that your server redirects /search/search to /search/search.php. >>> >>> Sarah >>> >>> ___ >>> dev mailing list >>> dev@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> M.Iftakhul Anwar >> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > M.Iftakhul Anwar > > > -- Regards, M.Iftakhul Anwar ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Nominatim Installation problem - nominatim.xml not found
Anyone know where is html template of nominatim index ? I want to modify html template of it Thnks 2012/1/30 Anwar Azulfa > Thanks Sarah, > > Now my www.osmosa.net/search is works :) > > > How about if i want to add input box (search box) on my main map, > www.osmosa.net > Because on www.osmosa.net there is no search box. > > How to do that ? > > > Thanks > > > 2012/1/30 Sarah Hoffmann > >> Hi Anwar, >> >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:58:47AM +0700, Anwar Azulfa wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Long time no continue this project,i have follow instruction from >> > http://open.mapquestapi.com/npi/ >> > >> > Now i have finished imported index file and generate web. >> > But when i try to query, error happen.I don't know what's that but >> there is >> > "permission denied" message. >> > >> > Let see on >> > >> > >> http://www.osmosa.net/search/search.php?q=jakarta&viewbox=-140.89%2C64.68%2C-20.83%2C31.75 >> > >> > >> > What should i do ? >> >> Two things: first of all, in settings/settings.php you need to adapt >> the base URL for your server. Find the line with CONST_Website_BaseURL >> and set it to http://www.osmosa.net/search/. Second, you need to make >> sure that your server redirects /search/search to /search/search.php. >> >> Sarah >> >> ___ >> dev mailing list >> dev@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >> > > > > -- > Regards, > M.Iftakhul Anwar > > > -- Regards, M.Iftakhul Anwar ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The original coastline processing from way back ran on a virtual server that ran on hardware from 2008 or before that was also doing a lot of other things and that took about half a day to generate the shapefiles (including the error files) It's no wonder your much newer dedicated hardware is a lot faster. On 01/31/2012 12:39 AM, Paul Norman wrote: > 2. It took my server about one hour from the start of > extracting the coastline data to creating the shapefiles. > My understanding was that this process took about a day. > I'm using a different route to extract coastline data than > osm2coast, could this account for the difference? >>> >>> A full coastline shapefile run (ie. both processed_p and >>> shoreline_300) takes a few hours to generate, generally. I have >>> no doubt that current hardware (cpu, ssd) can have a drastic >>> positive influence to get it to your 'one hour'. > I'm querying my pgsnapshot database - I think this accounts for > most of the differences. My server runs an AMD Phenom II 1090T x6 > with 6 7200 RPM drives in RAID10 > > - --- m.v.g., Cartinus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPJ1/QAAoJEInLUvwrL2kIEdkH/10GAUuicF8BgVs17aJ3HB0B hj+hqcyt1hxae416/EpKdRpj2ZFXgm3R24Q8XaOZoeadPAL9Se8V/NBGiQUf9y+4 dDawTz0ZQgXJe4ooC8xdXUjaZz/weUH8ugXg8RIzOLqzdJvVoDHVxRa1Etfjv3b/ e8hM1paTh6z+6QzXwNXcpBtvF6xQUqOrJSnHneH6ZVZ8k3lSXJyTpzQybT/0RYe+ 6QSU0B5/8UdwBTA835zDKTQLUFr8M+8RKvlhMM0ejO42KPV3ZPiVjGV9eemUFmuy 9k985fZZw/4Xr6nBhKKbNxjTTPFUeeJLBET/VAda8DJOxtBf6G5oQ3EU0LdEuXU= =1Q5r -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Restart apache2 (mod_tile)
Dewi Robiatul mubararah wrote: Hi, After I did start the render, then I restart apache2. but the result : dewirobiatul@dewi:~/src/mod_tile$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default: "line 1" sounds a bit odd. I'd expect the first 3 lines to be something like: ServerAdmin webmaster@localhost LoadTileConfigFile /usr/local/etc/renderd.conf with the virtual host definition first. Could you perhaps post the first half-dozen lines of "000-default" to confirm that it looks sensible? Also, as there are multiple related sets of instructions for different Linux distributions it might help to let people know which one(s) you're following? Cheers, Andy ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Restart apache2 (mod_tile)
Hi, this sounds like the mod_tile module was not actually installed in apache, which is where LoadTileConfigFile gets defined. Check if the "LoadModule tile_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_tile.so" is loaded, e.g. in the /etc/apache2/mods-enabled directory. How did you install mod_tile? Is this the first time you operate mod_tile, or did it break after an update? Kai On 01/-10/-28163 12:59 PM, Dewi Robiatul mubararah wrote: > Hi, > After I did start the render, then I restart apache2. but the result : > > dewirobiatul@dewi:~/src/mod_tile$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart > Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default: > Invalid command 'LoadTileConfigFile', perhaps misspelled or defined by a > module not included in the server configuration > Action 'configtest' failed. > The Apache error log may have more information. >...fail! > dewirobiatul@dewi:~/src/mod_tile$ > > please solution, thanks > > > ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] Restart apache2 (mod_tile)
Hi, After I did start the render, then I restart apache2. but the result : dewirobiatul@dewi:~/src/mod_tile$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default: Invalid command 'LoadTileConfigFile', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Action 'configtest' failed. The Apache error log may have more information. ...fail! dewirobiatul@dewi:~/src/mod_tile$ please solution, thanks ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles
> From: Lennard [mailto:l...@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 12:33 PM > To: dev@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles > > On 30-1-2012 6:09, Paul Norman wrote: > > I have been experimenting with generating the coastline shapefiles > > locally using > > http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/coastcheck/ and ended > > up with a few questions > > > > 1. Is this the same code that is currently used to generate the > > processed_p files? > > Yes, except for the slight tweaking of some initial values. Also, two > sets of shapefiles are generated, each with slightly different values > for shape overlap. The first is processed_p, the second is another > shapefile from which shoreline_300 is generated. The latter one takes > more time to generate and then simplify. How are the shoreline_300 generated? Coastcheck doesn't have any documentation, I had to figure out what doit did and how to compile the programs. > > > 2. It took my server about one hour from the start of extracting the > > coastline data to creating the shapefiles. My understanding was that > > this process took about a day. I'm using a different route to extract > > coastline data than osm2coast, could this account for the difference? > > A full coastline shapefile run (ie. both processed_p and shoreline_300) > takes a few hours to generate, generally. I have no doubt that current > hardware (cpu, ssd) can have a drastic positive influence to get it to > your 'one hour'. I'm querying my pgsnapshot database - I think this accounts for most of the differences. My server runs an AMD Phenom II 1090T x6 with 6 7200 RPM drives in RAID10 > > > 3. If I were to run the coastline generation daily and upload the > > files somewhere, could someone then host a slippymap showing coastline > errors? > > I'm sure there could be ways to get that done. If anyone is interested in doing something with these files, I can set up a cron script that will run the generation and scp it somewhere. > > > 4. Given that it only took an hour to generate, is there any way to > > get more frequent updates to the coastline files? > > Another limiting factor in this is that you would need the full planet > file, to be able to extract the coastlines. Applying diffs to update > that planet file adds a serious amount of time to a coastline run. Since I keep a pgsnapshot database up to date, this isn't an issue for my setup. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles
On 30-1-2012 6:09, Paul Norman wrote: I have been experimenting with generating the coastline shapefiles locally using http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/coastcheck/ and ended up with a few questions 1. Is this the same code that is currently used to generate the processed_p files? Yes, except for the slight tweaking of some initial values. Also, two sets of shapefiles are generated, each with slightly different values for shape overlap. The first is processed_p, the second is another shapefile from which shoreline_300 is generated. The latter one takes more time to generate and then simplify. 2. It took my server about one hour from the start of extracting the coastline data to creating the shapefiles. My understanding was that this process took about a day. I'm using a different route to extract coastline data than osm2coast, could this account for the difference? A full coastline shapefile run (ie. both processed_p and shoreline_300) takes a few hours to generate, generally. I have no doubt that current hardware (cpu, ssd) can have a drastic positive influence to get it to your 'one hour'. 3. If I were to run the coastline generation daily and upload the files somewhere, could someone then host a slippymap showing coastline errors? I'm sure there could be ways to get that done. 4. Given that it only took an hour to generate, is there any way to get more frequent updates to the coastline files? Another limiting factor in this is that you would need the full planet file, to be able to extract the coastlines. Applying diffs to update that planet file adds a serious amount of time to a coastline run. -- Lennard ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Using changesets-latest.osm
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Josh Doe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Toby Murray wrote: >> I present ChangesetMD: >> >> https://github.com/ToeBee/ChangesetMD > > What kind of stats are you (and others) thinking about generating? I'm > interested in seeing editor stats such as a time series of editor > usage, which editors people use (predominantly one or a mix, progress > from using one to another, etc.), the frequency and "quality" of > comments by editor, what tags people use besides the standard > comment/source/etc. > -Josh My initial use of this data was to get a specific list of changesets for dealing with the license change. But I certainly had in mind that it would be useful for some interesting analysis like what you have in mind. Off the top, I can say there are just over 700 unique key values used in tagging changesets. Some of them are obvious errors, some of them are actually interesting. There are 630,000 changesets with no changes in them. Didn't P1 create a changeset as soon as it was fired up, even if no changes were made? There are 239 changesets with 50,0001 objects. Off-by-one error in the API? :) And that's just the first few things that came to mind. I haven't had much time to get into the data yet. Heck, I'm still working on processing my survey data from Christmas :/ Toby ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Using changesets-latest.osm
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > I present ChangesetMD: > > https://github.com/ToeBee/ChangesetMD What kind of stats are you (and others) thinking about generating? I'm interested in seeing editor stats such as a time series of editor usage, which editors people use (predominantly one or a mix, progress from using one to another, etc.), the frequency and "quality" of comments by editor, what tags people use besides the standard comment/source/etc. -Josh ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles
- Original Message - From: "Paul Norman" To: Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:09 AM Subject: [OSM-dev] Coastline shapefiles I have been experimenting with generating the coastline shapefiles locally using http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/coastcheck/ and ended up with a few questions 1. Is this the same code that is currently used to generate the processed_p files? 2. It took my server about one hour from the start of extracting the coastline data to creating the shapefiles. My understanding was that this process took about a day. I'm using a different route to extract coastline data than osm2coast, could this account for the difference? 3. If I were to run the coastline generation daily and upload the files somewhere, could someone then host a slippymap showing coastline errors? Firstly , is a slippy map showing coastline errors really necessary? If you could upload the error point shapefile somewhere daily I'm sure you would find these errors were corrected within a few hours. Michal Migurski has been generating coastline error files every 3 - 4 weeks http://metro.teczno.com/#coastline, and recently I've been finding that by the time I try and correct the errors someone has got there first. Secondly , if my memory serves me correctly, the original coastline error map showed both points where there was a disconnect in the coastline, and also places where there were geometry issues (mainly the small artefacts left over form the PGS import). These errors were I believe displayed on the slippy map by way of transparent tiles, and obviously there was time taken to generate these tiles, and then bandwidth / space requirements involved in deploying them. Recently ( last 3 - 4 months) the number of disconnects has been reduced to a low number, and it is now possible to deploy a slippy map much more simply, see http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/ and hosting requirements for this are therefore minimal, if it was felt a coastline error map was useful. The number of the second type of error (geometry issues) is still quite high, and probably the only way to show these on a slippy map would be to go down the transparent tile route, though I guess some form of clustering of marker points would be possible. I do wonder though what the benefit of showing these on a slippy map would be. Over the last few months I've been going round clearing these errors up, and will continue to do so. I think I have reduced the number by about 2 / 3 rds so quantity wise it is not an impossible task. If at the end there are any remaining errors they are likely to be two causes: a) these are in Canada - Paul you are probably aware of my posting to the talk-ca list asking if it was worth my effort in clearing these up due to the possibility of wholesale replacement of the current coastline data with Canvec data b) clearing up the error is too complex. I know this is may sound like an excuse, but there was at least one area in the USA where a latter import of data with ways tagged as natural = water over the top of PGS ways tagged as natural = coastline, made a quick resolution of the problem difficult, and I gave up and moved to another area. Without wishing to sound arrogant, if someone needs a slippy map to identify the errors, then they are probably not the right person to go about sorting out the issue in this particular circumstance. ( BTW that's not a comment aimed at you Paul - if you're running the coastline error files and can get GeoBase NHN into OSM then I realise you are technically competent ; I'm just saying that crowdsourcing coastline error issues may in fact lead to more errors being created than are solved) Anyway to summarise. My belief is that producing a slippy map showing the coastline errors is not particularly necessary Daily production, and upload to somewhere accessible, of the error points shapefilefile ,and to a lesser extent the processed_p shapefile, would be very useful David 4. Given that it only took an hour to generate, is there any way to get more frequent updates to the coastline files? ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] NOTICE: Upcoming Maintenance / Downtime
On Friday 3rd of February 2012 between 11:30 and 13:00 (GMT / UTC) the primary database server will unavailable due to planned maintenance. The following services WILL be affected: * www.openstreetmap.org web site will not allow user login or edits (Potlatch). [1] * API and map database editing (using JOSM, Merkaartor etc.) will be unavailable. * planet.openstreetmap.org will be available but no new diffs will be generated during the outage. * Forum (no logins) [ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ] * trac (bug-tracker) [ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org ] * help.openstreetmap.org (no logins) Other services will NOT be affected - all of the following are expected to function normally: * tile serving (“View The Map” & “Export”) * Wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org * Nominatim (search) * mailing lists * subversion and git (source code repositories) * donate.openstreetmap.org Technical: Server Smaug: BIOS Update (to enable PCI-E 256 byte payload), RAID Controller PCI-E slot re-location and potential rack move. Server ramoth is being racked. 1: Maps will still be viewable on the openstreetmap.org homepage and on other people's websites. Sincerely Grant Slater On behalf of the OpenStreetMap sysadmin team. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Nominatim Installation problem - nominatim.xml not found
Thanks Sarah, Now my www.osmosa.net/search is works :) How about if i want to add input box (search box) on my main map, www.osmosa.net Because on www.osmosa.net there is no search box. How to do that ? Thanks 2012/1/30 Sarah Hoffmann > Hi Anwar, > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:58:47AM +0700, Anwar Azulfa wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Long time no continue this project,i have follow instruction from > > http://open.mapquestapi.com/npi/ > > > > Now i have finished imported index file and generate web. > > But when i try to query, error happen.I don't know what's that but there > is > > "permission denied" message. > > > > Let see on > > > > > http://www.osmosa.net/search/search.php?q=jakarta&viewbox=-140.89%2C64.68%2C-20.83%2C31.75 > > > > > > What should i do ? > > Two things: first of all, in settings/settings.php you need to adapt > the base URL for your server. Find the line with CONST_Website_BaseURL > and set it to http://www.osmosa.net/search/. Second, you need to make > sure that your server redirects /search/search to /search/search.php. > > Sarah > > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > -- Regards, M.Iftakhul Anwar ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Nominatim Installation problem - nominatim.xml not found
Hi Anwar, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:58:47AM +0700, Anwar Azulfa wrote: > Hi All, > > Long time no continue this project,i have follow instruction from > http://open.mapquestapi.com/npi/ > > Now i have finished imported index file and generate web. > But when i try to query, error happen.I don't know what's that but there is > "permission denied" message. > > Let see on > > http://www.osmosa.net/search/search.php?q=jakarta&viewbox=-140.89%2C64.68%2C-20.83%2C31.75 > > > What should i do ? Two things: first of all, in settings/settings.php you need to adapt the base URL for your server. Find the line with CONST_Website_BaseURL and set it to http://www.osmosa.net/search/. Second, you need to make sure that your server redirects /search/search to /search/search.php. Sarah ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
