Re: [OSM-dev] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: get node data from flatfile

2015-05-17 Thread Frederik Ramm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 05/17/2015 09:42 PM, Bernhard R. Fischer wrote:
>> But there is no existing plugin for flatfiles, right?

> It always reads flat files. (Option -i) But probably I
> misunderstood your problem.

Yes, Walter is talking about the node coordinate index file created by
osm2pgsql's "--flatnodes" option. It is a binary file that contains
(only) the coordinates of every node.

Bye
Frederik

- -- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVWPCaAAoJEOx/uhGAJu9HC6EH/0oA4QJgiUkl4emWkjSJ8UCw
6DKB4V1PgGegkQmCKWbYuyAcebQlLgwewR2S1LI/cbjUA2KHJ7leVAqd/Uis1jrA
Xa6j3xR3/Y9w2ehoPtTdMrncvRWmGj+FTy+ZHjguToYtSjoZhVo3BpKd1cp9Wykd
jukdF7FD3miWDxIz5ZzE3FZ4DKxZHz3JAd/hGNd30l4+YkzoHavNEF+TKd+KsFqz
9mz66QfEgiUh0GfYAN5VjRCfafa8SB0yS8rEnyndzIhMUK5f6k0PPk832S65ALZO
k2wSEqIOTJYjWJZqyylr31CV5VM8CEc4mddTkQKudtdh8fXlmbTmsLmH9MIDUXw=
=ssu4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev


Re: [OSM-dev] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: get node data from flatfile

2015-05-17 Thread Bernhard R. Fischer
On Saturday 09 May 2015 16:56:18 Walter Nordmann wrote:
> But there is no existing plugin for flatfiles, right?
> 
> walter

It always reads flat files. (Option -i)

But probably I misunderstood your problem.


Bernhard


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev


Re: [OSM-dev] Changeset without bbox

2015-05-17 Thread Grant Slater
Hi Michael,

Changesets which only modify relations do not have a bbox.

Kind regards,
Grant

On 17 May 2015 at 16:44, Michael Larsen  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently observed a changeset which does not have a bbox (the 'min_lat',
> 'max_lat' etc. tags).   The changeset re-orderes members of a relation, so it
> is not a typical changeset and maybe this is the expected behavior since no
> nodes are directly involved?
>
> The changeset is here:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/31217983
>
> The web-map-view from the URL below also does not show the bbox nor does it
> zoom to the area for the changeset. This indicates to me that the bbox was
> expected by the web-map-view backend...?
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31217983
>
> /MichaelVL
>
> ___
> dev mailing list
> dev@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev


[OSM-dev] Changeset without bbox

2015-05-17 Thread Michael Larsen
Hi,

I recently observed a changeset which does not have a bbox (the 'min_lat', 
'max_lat' etc. tags).   The changeset re-orderes members of a relation, so it 
is not a typical changeset and maybe this is the expected behavior since no 
nodes are directly involved?

The changeset is here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/31217983

The web-map-view from the URL below also does not show the bbox nor does it 
zoom to the area for the changeset. This indicates to me that the bbox was 
expected by the web-map-view backend...?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31217983

/MichaelVL

___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev