Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4
pretty cool! On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Awesome! Thanks Gurkan! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 3:14 PM The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Not anymore ! It has done :) I will start to release process in this week. --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 11:58:15 AM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 The biggest missing part is now to complete the SPI implementation. Otherwise OWB is really usable already (using it in a production project since a month now). But I'm not sure if we really need this for the M4 release (would be fine though). I'd rather like to kick out a M4 now and ship a M5 later this month. There are also a few very important conferences this month (including JSFDays together with the Spring people) and it would be really cool if people can go out and use OWB without having to compile it theirselfs! LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 1/31/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 1:36 AM Hi; It has remained some issues in M4 release. After closing those issues, release will be more fine and developer friendly :) I think that we will work on those issues in this week and some more testing and release M4 in weekend. Thanks; --Gurkan From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Sat, January 30, 2010 12:22:53 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Releasing M4 Hallo guys, is the plan still on, to release M4 in the next week(s)? Thanks! Matthias On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi folks, It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 release. I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most mature and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of the next week. I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living as a TLP. WDYT? Thanks; --Gurkan ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828263#action_12828263 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-259: it is good to fix it in 1.0.0 Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event -- Key: OWB-259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Events Affects Versions: M3 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Fix For: 1.0.0 The latest spec (MR1) introduces a ProcessModule event. Should we add this now or postpone the implementation after we released M4? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828265#action_12828265 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-259: --- In this case, we should ask David or any other geronimo committer to please release a milestone of the geronimo-jcdi-1.0 package now. Otherwise we cannot release M4... LieGrue, strub Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event -- Key: OWB-259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Events Affects Versions: M3 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Fix For: 1.0.0 The latest spec (MR1) introduces a ProcessModule event. Should we add this now or postpone the implementation after we released M4? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
Hi folks! We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a release of OpenWebBeans Milestone 4 in the next days and need our API to be release also. Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of a milestone of the jcdi-spec-1.0 for us? txs in advance and LieGrue, strub
Re: [jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event
to be able to release OWB-M4 we first need geronimo guys to release our API, since the maven-release-plugin will not let you perform the release if you have a SNAPSHOT dependency in any of your poms ;) Already sent the mail to geronimo-dev as kevan told me to do in IRC. LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 9:53 PM why do not release M4? We will not support ProcessMdouleEvent in M4 From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:46:46 PM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event In this case, we should ask David or any other geronimo committer to please release a milestone of the geronimo-jcdi-1.0 package now. Otherwise we cannot release M4... LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: From: Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA) j...@apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (OWB-259) Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event To: strub...@yahoo.de Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 9:40 PM [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828263#action_12828263 ] Gurkan Erdogdu commented on OWB-259: it is good to fix it in 1.0.0 Implement spec 11.5.5. ProcessModule event -- Key: OWB-259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-259 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Components: Events Affects Versions: M3 Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Fix For: 1.0.0 The latest spec (MR1) introduces a ProcessModule event. Should we add this now or postpone the implementation after we released M4? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
Hello, This is also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec, currently we use 1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT --Gurkan From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de To: d...@geronimo.apache.org Cc: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM Subject: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ? Hi folks! We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a release of OpenWebBeans Milestone 4 in the next days and need our API to be release also. Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of a milestone of the jcdi-spec-1.0 for us? txs in advance and LieGrue, strub ___ Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor!
Some little JSR-299 extensions for JSF
Hi folks! FYI, I've started implementing a few extensions for JSF using OWB: http://github.com/struberg/myfaces-ext-cdi Looks promising so far ;) LieGrue, strub
