Hi Arne!
Could you please add your findings to CDI-70? Have not yet looked at it in
detail (today fighting with my new mac...) but it sounds like it would make
sense to make this clear in the spec.
LieGrue,
strub
(who is slowly picking up speed again)
- Original Message -
From: Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de
To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:13 PM
Subject: Bug in ProcessAnnotatedType?
Hi,
I recognized that the AnnotatedType returned by the ProcessAnnotatedType
event
does not contain fields, methods and constructors of the superclass. Is this
intentional or would you consider this to be a bug? I am afraid that the Spec
is
not quite clear about this again.
This is definitely not the behavior I, being an Extension-developer, would
expect. I am writing an Extension, that replaces annotations of fields,
constructors and methods. With your implementation I am not able to replace
annotations of superclasses as after processing of my provided AnntatedType
you
call DefinitionUtil.defineInternalInjectedFieldsRecursively and walk through
the
fields by reflection.
Imho you only should use the AnnotatedType here (and it should contain
Fields,
Constructors and Methods of superclasses).
@Mark: This should be clarified in CDI 1.1
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70 says the same, but it is only the
second
part. The first part is, that the AnnotatedType should contain fields,
constructors and methods of the superclass or should get a method
getSuperType(). This is not addressed by the 1.1 version of the Spec for now
as
far as I can see.
Regards,
Arne
--
Arne Limburg - Enterprise Architect
open knowledge GmbH, Oldenburg
Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg
Mobil: +49 (0) 151 108 22 942
Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0
Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111
arne.limb...@openknowledge.demailto:arne.limb...@openknowledge.de
http://www.openknowledge.de
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670
Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann
