date:20120716

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO

Thanks Romain.
If there is another area where I can dig into, that'd be a pleasure.

JLouis

2012/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau 

> pushed it
>
> Thks JL!
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/7/16 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>
> > Cool, thx for reviewing so quickly.
> > Jean louis
> > Le 16 juil. 2012 20:16, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :
> >
> > > patch looks fine!
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg 
> > > > Cc:
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade which
> could
> > be
> > > > split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly fine :)
> > > >
> > > > - Romain
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/7/16 Mark Struberg 
> > > >
> > > >>  Hi!
> > > >>
> > > >>  Thanks folks!
> > > >>  Will review it this afternoon.
> > > >>
> > > >>  LieGrue,
> > > >>  strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>  - Original Message -
> > > >>  > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > > >>  > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > >>  > Cc:
> > > >>  > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> > > >>  > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > Hi devs,
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger
> > API
> > > > over
> > > >>  > the project.
> > > >>  > It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on
> > JUL.
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file
> > > > changed so
> > > >>  > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > Hope it help,
> > > >>  > Jean-Louis
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>  mainly what was done in the patch of
> > > >>  >>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too
> > > > much
> > > >>  but
> > > >>  >>  was
> > > >>  >>  done ;))
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >>  - Romain
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
> > > >>  >>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we
> > > > could just
> > > >>  >>  review
> > > >>  >>  > the factory.
> > > >>  >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > Thoughts?
> > > >>  >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > JLouis
> > > >>  >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > >>  >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > > I think questions are:
> > > >>  >>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
> > > >>  >>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging
> > > > API? (add
> > > >>  > or
> > > >>  >>  > reuse
> > > >>  >>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
> > > >>  >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > - Romain
> > > >>  >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> > > >>  >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain
> > > > :D
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to
> > > > remove
> > > >>  > the
> > > >>  >>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > LieGrue,
> > > >>  >>  > > > strub
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > - Original Message -
> > > >>  >>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > > > 
> > > >>  >>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > >>  >>  > > > > Cc:
> > > >>  >>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
> > > >>  >>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > > >>  >>  > > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > > Mark,
> > > >>  >>  > > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to
> > > > submit a patch
> > > >>  > if you
> > > >>  >>  agree.
> > > >>  >>  > > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > > Jean-Louis
> > > >>  >>  > > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >>  > 
> > > >>  >>  > > > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis
> > > >>  > MONTEIRO"
> > > >>  >>  > > > >  a écrit
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  :
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > JLouis
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg
> > > >>  > 
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz,
> > > > currently holding
> > > >>  > workshops the next 2
> > > >>  >>  > > > > days.
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > strub
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
> > > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > > >>  > 
> > > >>  >>

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-674) rewrite owb logger api

2012-07-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Romain Manni-Bucau resolved OWB-674.


   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5

> rewrite owb logger api
> --
>
> Key: OWB-674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Fix For: 1.1.5
>
> Attachments: OWB-674.diff, OWB-674.patch
>
>
> Currently the OWB logging facade is pretty useless since it only supports JUL.
> It could be nice to:
> 1) allow to switch to another logging framework
> 2) remove the getStackTrace in JUL implementation since it has bg performance 
> impacts

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

pushed it

Thks JL!

- Romain


2012/7/16 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 

> Cool, thx for reviewing so quickly.
> Jean louis
> Le 16 juil. 2012 20:16, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :
>
> > patch looks fine!
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg 
> > > Cc:
> > > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM
> > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;)
> > >
> > >
> > > the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade which could
> be
> > > split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly fine :)
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/7/16 Mark Struberg 
> > >
> > >>  Hi!
> > >>
> > >>  Thanks folks!
> > >>  Will review it this afternoon.
> > >>
> > >>  LieGrue,
> > >>  strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  - Original Message -
> > >>  > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > >>  > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>  > Cc:
> > >>  > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> > >>  > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > >>  >
> > >>  > Hi devs,
> > >>  >
> > >>  > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger
> API
> > > over
> > >>  > the project.
> > >>  > It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on
> JUL.
> > >>  >
> > >>  > If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file
> > > changed so
> > >>  > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
> > >>  >
> > >>  > Hope it help,
> > >>  > Jean-Louis
> > >>  >
> > >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > >>  >
> > >>  >>  mainly what was done in the patch of
> > >>  >>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too
> > > much
> > >>  but
> > >>  >>  was
> > >>  >>  done ;))
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  - Romain
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > >>  >>
> > >>  >>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
> > >>  >>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we
> > > could just
> > >>  >>  review
> > >>  >>  > the factory.
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > Thoughts?
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > JLouis
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > >>  >>  >
> > >>  >>  > > I think questions are:
> > >>  >>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
> > >>  >>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging
> > > API? (add
> > >>  > or
> > >>  >>  > reuse
> > >>  >>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
> > >>  >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > - Romain
> > >>  >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> > >>  >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain
> > > :D
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to
> > > remove
> > >>  > the
> > >>  >>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > LieGrue,
> > >>  >>  > > > strub
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > - Original Message -
> > >>  >>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > > 
> > >>  >>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>  >>  > > > > Cc:
> > >>  >>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
> > >>  >>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > >>  >>  > > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > > Mark,
> > >>  >>  > > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to
> > > submit a patch
> > >>  > if you
> > >>  >>  agree.
> > >>  >>  > > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > > Jean-Louis
> > >>  >>  > > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>  > 
> > >>  >>  > > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis
> > >>  > MONTEIRO"
> > >>  >>  > > > >  a écrit
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  :
> > >>  >>  > > > >>
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > JLouis
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg
> > >>  > 
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz,
> > > currently holding
> > >>  > workshops the next 2
> > >>  >>  > > > > days.
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > strub
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > >>  > 
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > To:
> > > dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Cc:
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25,
> > > 2012 8:15 AM
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger
> > > api?
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make
> > > things simpler
> > >>  > to integrate ;-)
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > JLouis
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> > >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO

Cool, thx for reviewing so quickly.
Jean louis
Le 16 juil. 2012 20:16, "Mark Struberg"  a écrit :

> patch looks fine!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg 
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM
> > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;)
> >
> >
> > the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade which could be
> > split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly fine :)
> >
> > - Romain
> >
> >
> > 2012/7/16 Mark Struberg 
> >
> >>  Hi!
> >>
> >>  Thanks folks!
> >>  Will review it this afternoon.
> >>
> >>  LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  - Original Message -
> >>  > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> >>  > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  > Cc:
> >>  > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> >>  > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >>  >
> >>  > Hi devs,
> >>  >
> >>  > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger API
> > over
> >>  > the project.
> >>  > It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on JUL.
> >>  >
> >>  > If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file
> > changed so
> >>  > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
> >>  >
> >>  > Hope it help,
> >>  > Jean-Louis
> >>  >
> >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> >>  >
> >>  >>  mainly what was done in the patch of
> >>  >>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too
> > much
> >>  but
> >>  >>  was
> >>  >>  done ;))
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  - Romain
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
> >>  >>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we
> > could just
> >>  >>  review
> >>  >>  > the factory.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > Thoughts?
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > JLouis
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  > > I think questions are:
> >>  >>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
> >>  >>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging
> > API? (add
> >>  > or
> >>  >>  > reuse
> >>  >>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
> >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > - Romain
> >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> >>  >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain
> > :D
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to
> > remove
> >>  > the
> >>  >>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > LieGrue,
> >>  >>  > > > strub
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > - Original Message -
> >>  >>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > 
> >>  >>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  >>  > > > > Cc:
> >>  >>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
> >>  >>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  > > > > Mark,
> >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to
> > submit a patch
> >>  > if you
> >>  >>  agree.
> >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  > > > > Jean-Louis
> >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  > 
> >>  >>  > > > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
> >>  >>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis
> >>  > MONTEIRO"
> >>  >>  > > > >  a écrit
> >>  >>  > > > >>  :
> >>  >>  > > > >>
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
> >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > JLouis
> >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg
> >>  > 
> >>  >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz,
> > currently holding
> >>  > workshops the next 2
> >>  >>  > > > > days.
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > strub
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> >>  > 
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > To:
> > dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Cc:
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25,
> > 2012 8:15 AM
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger
> > api?
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make
> > things simpler
> >>  > to integrate ;-)
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > JLouis
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25 Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> >>  > 
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  any other opinion?
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  do we move to JULI
> > directly?
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  - Romain
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  2012/6/11 Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> >>  >>  > > > > 
> >>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Mark Struberg

patch looks fine!

LieGrue,
strub



- Original Message -
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau 
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org; Mark Struberg 
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 11:03 AM
> Subject: Re: new logger api?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;)
> 
> 
> the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade which could be
> split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly fine :)
> 
> - Romain
> 
> 
> 2012/7/16 Mark Struberg 
> 
>>  Hi!
>> 
>>  Thanks folks!
>>  Will review it this afternoon.
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  - Original Message -
>>  > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>>  > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>  > Cc:
>>  > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
>>  > Subject: Re: new logger api?
>>  >
>>  > Hi devs,
>>  >
>>  > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger API 
> over
>>  > the project.
>>  > It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on JUL.
>>  >
>>  > If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file 
> changed so
>>  > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
>>  >
>>  > Hope it help,
>>  > Jean-Louis
>>  >
>>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  >
>>  >>  mainly what was done in the patch of
>>  >>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too 
> much
>>  but
>>  >>  was
>>  >>  done ;))
>>  >>
>>  >>  - Romain
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>>  >>
>>  >>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
>>  >>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we 
> could just
>>  >>  review
>>  >>  > the factory.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Thoughts?
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > JLouis
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > > I think questions are:
>>  >>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
>>  >>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging 
> API? (add
>>  > or
>>  >>  > reuse
>>  >>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
>>  >>  > >
>>  >>  > > - Romain
>>  >>  > >
>>  >>  > >
>>  >>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
>>  >>  > >
>>  >>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain  
> :D
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to 
> remove
>>  > the
>>  >>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > LieGrue,
>>  >>  > > > strub
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > - Original Message -
>>  >>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> 
>>  >>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>  >>  > > > > Cc:
>>  >>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
>>  >>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  >>  > > > > Mark,
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  >>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to 
> submit a patch
>>  > if you
>>  >>  agree.
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  >>  > > > > Jean-Louis
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  >>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  > 
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
>>  >>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis
>>  > MONTEIRO"
>>  >>  > > > >  a écrit
>>  >>  > > > >>  :
>>  >>  > > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
>>  >>  > > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
>>  >>  > > > >>  > JLouis
>>  >>  > > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg
>>  > 
>>  >>  > > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz, 
> currently holding
>>  > workshops the next 2
>>  >>  > > > > days.
>>  >>  > > > >>  > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > strub
>>  >>  > > > >>  > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
>>  > 
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > To: 
> dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Cc:
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 
> 2012 8:15 AM
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger 
> api?
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make 
> things simpler
>>  > to integrate ;-)
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > JLouis
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25 Romain 
> Manni-Bucau
>>  > 
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  any other opinion?
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  do we move to JULI 
> directly?
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  - Romain
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  2012/6/11 Romain 
> Manni-Bucau
>>  >>  > > > > 
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > no:
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > private void 
> wblLog(Level
>>  > level, String
>>  >>  > > > > messageKey)
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >     {
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >         if
>>  > (logger.isLoggable(level))
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >         {
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
>>  >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  >>  > > > >
>>  > Thread.currentThr

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk » OpenWebBeans Core #876

2012-07-16 Thread Apache Jenkins Server

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk #876

2012-07-16 Thread Apache Jenkins Server

See

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

Hi,

hope will be fine since we discussed of it together ;)


the only interrogation point is about webbeansloggerfacade which could be
split with a messageutil class but for me that's mainly fine :)

- Romain


2012/7/16 Mark Struberg 

> Hi!
>
> Thanks folks!
> Will review it this afternoon.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger API over
> > the project.
> > It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on JUL.
> >
> > If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file changed so
> > the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
> >
> > Hope it help,
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> >
> >>  mainly what was done in the patch of
> >>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too much
> but
> >>  was
> >>  done ;))
> >>
> >>  - Romain
> >>
> >>
> >>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> >>
> >>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
> >>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we could just
> >>  review
> >>  > the factory.
> >>  >
> >>  > Thoughts?
> >>  >
> >>  > JLouis
> >>  >
> >>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> >>  >
> >>  > > I think questions are:
> >>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
> >>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging API? (add
> > or
> >>  > reuse
> >>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
> >>  > >
> >>  > > - Romain
> >>  > >
> >>  > >
> >>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> >>  > >
> >>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain  :D
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to remove
> > the
> >>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > LieGrue,
> >>  > > > strub
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > >
> >>  > > > - Original Message -
> >>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> >>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  > > > > Cc:
> >>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
> >>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >>  > > > >
> >>  > > > > Mark,
> >>  > > > >
> >>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to submit a patch
> > if you
> >>  agree.
> >>  > > > >
> >>  > > > > Jean-Louis
> >>  > > > >
> >>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> > 
> >>  > > > >
> >>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
> >>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis
> > MONTEIRO"
> >>  > > > >  a écrit
> >>  > > > >>  :
> >>  > > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
> >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
> >>  > > > >>  > JLouis
> >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg
> > 
> >>  > > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz, currently holding
> > workshops the next 2
> >>  > > > > days.
> >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
> >>  > > > >>  > > strub
> >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  > > > >>  > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
> >>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > 
> >>  > > > >>  > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >>  > > > >>  > > > Cc:
> >>  > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:15 AM
> >>  > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make things simpler
> > to integrate ;-)
> >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > > JLouis
> >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau
> > 
> >>  > > > >>  > > >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  any other opinion?
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  do we move to JULI directly?
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  - Romain
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  > > > > 
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > no:
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > private void wblLog(Level
> > level, String
> >>  > > > > messageKey)
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > {
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > if
> > (logger.isLoggable(level))
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > {
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >
> > Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(),
> >>  > > > >>  > > > messageKey);
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > }
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > }
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > well if we move to natve
> > JUL we'll need to
> >>  > > > > keep a factory to
> >>  > > > >>  allow
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > subclasses to switch of
> > implementation as cxf
> >>  > > > > does.
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > - Romain
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  > 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg
> > 
> >>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
> >>  >

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Mark Struberg

Hi!

Thanks folks!
Will review it this afternoon.

LieGrue,
strub



- Original Message -
> From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 9:59 AM
> Subject: Re: new logger api?
> 
> Hi devs,
> 
> As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger API over
> the project.
> It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on JUL.
> 
> If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file changed so
> the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.
> 
> Hope it help,
> Jean-Louis
> 
> 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>>  mainly what was done in the patch of
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too much but
>>  was
>>  done ;))
>> 
>>  - Romain
>> 
>> 
>>  2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>> 
>>  > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
>>  > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we could just
>>  review
>>  > the factory.
>>  >
>>  > Thoughts?
>>  >
>>  > JLouis
>>  >
>>  > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>  >
>>  > > I think questions are:
>>  > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
>>  > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging API? (add 
> or
>>  > reuse
>>  > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
>>  > >
>>  > > - Romain
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
>>  > >
>>  > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain  :D
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to remove 
> the
>>  > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > LieGrue,
>>  > > > strub
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > - Original Message -
>>  > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>>  > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>  > > > > Cc:
>>  > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
>>  > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Mark,
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > That be a good starting point for me to submit a patch 
> if you
>>  agree.
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > Jean-Louis
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>>  > > > >
>>  > > > >>  Or friends ;)
>>  > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis 
> MONTEIRO"
>>  > > > >  a écrit
>>  > > > >>  :
>>  > > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
>>  > > > >>  > JLouis
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> 
>>  > > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz, currently holding 
> workshops the next 2
>>  > > > > days.
>>  > > > >>  > >
>>  > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
>>  > > > >>  > > strub
>>  > > > >>  > >
>>  > > > >>  > >
>>  > > > >>  > >
>>  > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
>>  > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> 
>>  > > > >>  > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>>  > > > >>  > > > Cc:
>>  > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:15 AM
>>  > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
>>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make things simpler 
> to integrate ;-)
>>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  > > > >>  > > > JLouis
>>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>>  > > > >>  > > >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  any other opinion?
>>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  do we move to JULI directly?
>>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  - Romain
>>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau
>>  > > > > 
>>  > > > >>  > > >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > no:
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > private void wblLog(Level 
> level, String
>>  > > > > messageKey)
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >     {
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >         if 
> (logger.isLoggable(level))
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >         {
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >            
> logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > > 
> Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(),
>>  > > > >>  > > > messageKey);
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >         }
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >     }
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > well if we move to natve 
> JUL we'll need to
>>  > > > > keep a factory to
>>  > > > >>  allow
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > subclasses to switch of 
> implementation as cxf
>>  > > > > does.
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > - Romain
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  > 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg 
> 
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> +1
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> The getStackTrace 
> only hits us if we throw an
>>  > > > > Exception, right?
>>  > > > >>  > > > The
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> problem is that due 
> to the additional wrapper
>>  > > > > handler we always
>>  > > > >>  > > > have a
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> 'mismatch' in 
> the StackTrace...
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> I'm tempted to 
> move to native jul
>>  > > > > anyway...
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >>
>>  > > > >>  > > >>  >> Li

Re: new logger api?

2012-07-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO

Hi devs,

As discussed, just submitted the patch file to change the Logger API over
the project.
It now contains a factory with a default implementation based on JUL.

If someone can review it, that'd be great cause a lot of file changed so
the sooner, the better to merge/integrate.

Hope it help,
Jean-Louis

2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 

> mainly what was done in the patch of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674 (maybe a bit too much but
> was
> done ;))
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/6/25 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>
> > I guess a new thread must be opened with [VOTE].
> > Anyway, if we wanna support other logging API, may be we could just
> review
> > the factory.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> >
> > > I think questions are:
> > > 1) do we remove WebBeansLogger? --> JUL
> > > 2) do we add a thin layer to allow to use other logging API? (add or
> > reuse
> > > if we go for slf4j for instance)
> > >
> > > - Romain
> > >
> > >
> > > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> > >
> > > > full ack, yeaaa we found a volunteer - txs romain  :D
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nah, serious. We should do a VOTE about whether to remove the
> > > > WebBeansLogger or not.
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > > > Cc:
> > > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 10:46 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark,
> > > > >
> > > > > That be a good starting point for me to submit a patch if you
> agree.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jean-Louis
> > > > >
> > > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > > >
> > > > >>  Or friends ;)
> > > > >>  Le 25 juin 2012 08:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
> > > > >  a écrit
> > > > >>  :
> > > > >>
> > > > >>  > You still have nights ;-)
> > > > >>  >
> > > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > Was a joke, sorry.
> > > > >>  > JLouis
> > > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > 2012/6/25 Mark Struberg 
> > > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > gimme a few days plz, currently holding workshops the next 2
> > > > > days.
> > > > >>  > >
> > > > >>  > > LieGrue,
> > > > >>  > > strub
> > > > >>  > >
> > > > >>  > >
> > > > >>  > >
> > > > >>  > > - Original Message -
> > > > >>  > > > From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > > > >>  > > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > > >>  > > > Cc:
> > > > >>  > > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:15 AM
> > > > >>  > > > Subject: Re: new logger api?
> > > > >>  > > >
> > > > >>  > > > Yes, that will make things simpler to integrate ;-)
> > > > >>  > > >
> > > > >>  > > > JLouis
> > > > >>  > > >
> > > > >>  > > > 2012/6/25 Romain Manni-Bucau 
> > > > >>  > > >
> > > > >>  > > >>  any other opinion?
> > > > >>  > > >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  do we move to JULI directly?
> > > > >>  > > >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  - Romain
> > > > >>  > > >>
> > > > >>  > > >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  2012/6/11 Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > 
> > > > >>  > > >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  > no:
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  > private void wblLog(Level level, String
> > > > > messageKey)
> > > > >>  > > >>  > {
> > > > >>  > > >>  > if (logger.isLoggable(level))
> > > > >>  > > >>  > {
> > > > >>  > > >>  > logger.logp(level, caller.getName(),
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > > Thread.currentThread().getStackTrace()[3].getMethodName(),
> > > > >>  > > > messageKey);
> > > > >>  > > >>  > }
> > > > >>  > > >>  > }
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  > well if we move to natve JUL we'll need to
> > > > > keep a factory to
> > > > >>  allow
> > > > >>  > > >>  > subclasses to switch of implementation as cxf
> > > > > does.
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  > - Romain
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  > 2012/6/11 Mark Struberg 
> > > > >>  > > >>  >
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> +1
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> The getStackTrace only hits us if we throw an
> > > > > Exception, right?
> > > > >>  > > > The
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> problem is that due to the additional wrapper
> > > > > handler we always
> > > > >>  > > > have a
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> 'mismatch' in the StackTrace...
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> I'm tempted to move to native jul
> > > > > anyway...
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> LieGrue,
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> strub
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >>
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> - Original Message -
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > 
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > Cc:
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:28 PM
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > Subject: new logger api?
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> >
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > Hi,
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> >
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> > just created
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
> > > > >>  > > >>  >> >
> > >

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-674) rewrite owb logger api

2012-07-16 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO (JIRA)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jean-Louis MONTEIRO updated OWB-674:


Attachment: OWB-674.diff

Here is a patch file with The JUL Facade and all changes.
Build passes, Checkstyle activated and TCK running without any problems.

> rewrite owb logger api
> --
>
> Key: OWB-674
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-674
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>Assignee: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Attachments: OWB-674.diff, OWB-674.patch
>
>
> Currently the OWB logging facade is pretty useless since it only supports JUL.
> It could be nice to:
> 1) allow to switch to another logging framework
> 2) remove the getStackTrace in JUL implementation since it has bg performance 
> impacts

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Re: new logger api?

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-674) rewrite owb logger api

Re: new logger api?

Re: new logger api?

Re: new logger api?

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk » OpenWebBeans Core #876

Jenkins build is back to stable : OpenWebBeans-trunk #876

Re: new logger api?

Re: new logger api?

Re: new logger api?

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-674) rewrite owb logger api

11 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information