Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0
+1 for beta 2013/4/9 Romain Manni-Bucau > +1 in beta mode (1.2.0.beta1?) > Le 9 avr. 2013 21:03, "Gerhard Petracek" a > écrit : > > > hi @ all, > > > > we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> imo it would be great to > release > > it within the next two weeks. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0
+1 in beta mode (1.2.0.beta1?) Le 9 avr. 2013 21:03, "Gerhard Petracek" a écrit : > hi @ all, > > we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> imo it would be great to release > it within the next two weeks. > > regards, > gerhard >
[DISCUSS] release of owb 1.2.0
hi @ all, we have a lot of improvements for 1.2.0 -> imo it would be great to release it within the next two weeks. regards, gerhard
Re: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
because it's broken!
It's broken in the CDI-1.0 spec and we clarified the correct behaviour in
CDI-1.1.
Btw, which branch do you speak of?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Gurkan Erdogdu
> To: openwebbeans-dev
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 11:17 AM
> Subject: CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
>
> Hi
>
> In AbstractProducerBean below method is commented out but TCK 1.0 still
> checks
> ProducerMethod's Serializable return type and fields.
>
> public void validatePassivationDependencies()
> {
> // don't call super.validatePassivationDependencies()!
> // the injection points of producers are the parameters of the
> producermethod.
> // since CDI-1.1 we must not check those for is serializable anymore.
> }
>
>
> In CDI 1.1 this is corrected but TCK 1.0 still check this. Why is this
> commented
> out?
>
>
> Gurkan
>
CDI 1.0 TCK Problem + validatePassivationDependencies
Hi
In AbstractProducerBean below method is commented out but TCK 1.0 still checks
ProducerMethod's Serializable return type and fields.
public void validatePassivationDependencies()
{
// don't call super.validatePassivationDependencies()!
// the injection points of producers are the parameters of the
producermethod.
// since CDI-1.1 we must not check those for is serializable anymore.
}
In CDI 1.1 this is corrected but TCK 1.0 still check this. Why is this
commented out?
Gurkan
