Agree with Romain Good or bad it is there in the spec. We need something to pass the suite before we can call it done and go final in my opinion.
I'm ok if it requires a flag or if it's in another separated module. But it has to be there somehow. Le lun. 30 janv. 2023, 14:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > * +1 to drop jetty plugin for now > * +-0 to shade cdi-api (nobody will consume it anyway) > * -1 to release to not milestone without being spec compliant - including > cdi-lite which is part of cdi-core (even if we all disagree), minimum for > me is to provide an openwebbeans-lite module implementing the cdi extension > making it supported, +1 to get a 4.0.0-alpha1 if it helps > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 30 janv. 2023 à 14:43, Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > all sounds good to me > > > > Am Mo., 30. Jan. 2023 um 14:41 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > > > hi folks! > > > > > > We are up and running with passing most CDI-4.0 TCK tests. > > > There are a few areas where we have excluded some tests: > > > > > > * CDI-lite. I'll not gonna implement this in OWB as it is purely for > > > Quarkus and I don't care. It should be straight forward to implement > the > > > functionality as OWB plugin if someone really needs it though. > > > * Some challenged tests, some unspecified behaviour in some tests. E.g. > > > they assume a specified order class annotations before method > annotations > > > for Interceptors. But the spec *explicitly* says that for Interceptors > > with > > > the same @Priority the order is unspecified. > > > * backward incompatible reversing the default bean-discovery-mode for > > > empty beans.xmls. I'll not gonna implement this as it also did break > the > > > JakartaEE rules alltogether. > > > > > > > > > Things I want to change yet before the release: > > > > > > * Decide about the jetty9 plugin. Tbh I'd keep it excluded until > someone > > > wants to contribute fixes to it. > > > * provide a shaded version of the CDI api jar without all the CDI-lite > > > parts. > > > > > > > > > Wdyt? > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > >
