Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-15 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi folks!

I've now moved our trunk to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT and created a fresh 1.1.x 
maintenance branch from the 1.1.6 tag:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.1.x

This is now state 1.1.6 with only the versions upgraded to 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT. 
Please pick the fixes you need for 1.1.7 and apply it over there as well.

What should go on in 1.2.0:

We are basically free to even change the SPI for 1.2.0!

Thus I have the following refactorings in the chain:

* Introduce HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager. We need this 
for better performing EAR support

* drop our SecurityService and use Matt Bensons bytecode @Privileged trick. We 
are currently discussing whether Matt should move this to a new 
commons-privilizer project.
* finish the move from javassist to ASM4
* move from scannotation to xbean-finder or commons-classscan

* remove our own Class.get handling and switch over to only use 
AnnotatedTypes for scanning. We probably can get rid of lots of code that way!


LieGrue,
strub



- Original Message -
 From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
 To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
 Cc: 
 Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:10 PM
 Subject: Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?
 
 +1
 
 
 2012/11/11 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com
 
  +1 for 1.2.0
 
  Gurkan
 
 
 
  
   Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
  Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
  Gönderildiği Tarih: 10 Kasım 2012 17:21 Cumartesi
  Konu: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?
 
  Hi folks!
 
  Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in
  the API might be too big a change for a bugfix release.
 
  So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0.
  This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well as
  finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager
  we need for properly supporting EARs.
 
  wdyt?
 
  LieGrue,
  strub
 



Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-11 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
+1 for 1.2.0

Gurkan




 Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org 
Gönderildiği Tarih: 10 Kasım 2012 17:21 Cumartesi
Konu: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?
 
Hi folks!

Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in the 
API might be too big a change for a bugfix release. 

So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0. 
This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well as 
finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager we 
need for properly supporting EARs.

wdyt?

LieGrue,
strub

Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-11 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
+1


2012/11/11 Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com

 +1 for 1.2.0

 Gurkan



 
  Kimden: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
 Kime: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
 Gönderildiği Tarih: 10 Kasım 2012 17:21 Cumartesi
 Konu: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

 Hi folks!

 Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in
 the API might be too big a change for a bugfix release.

 So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0.
 This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well as
 finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager
 we need for properly supporting EARs.

 wdyt?

 LieGrue,
 strub



Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-10 Thread Thomas Andraschko
Hi Mark,

+1 for 1.2.0.
Do we completely remove javasisst? If yes, i would like to so some failover
refactoring, too.

Regards,
Thomas

2012/11/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

 Hi folks!

 Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in
 the API might be too big a change for a bugfix release.

 So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0.
 This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well as
 finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager
 we need for properly supporting EARs.

 wdyt?

 LieGrue,
 strub


Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1

regards,
gerhard



2012/11/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

 Hi folks!

 Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in
 the API might be too big a change for a bugfix release.

 So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0.
 This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well as
 finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager
 we need for properly supporting EARs.

 wdyt?

 LieGrue,
 strub


Re: 1.1.8 or 1.2.0 ?

2012-11-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
i'd like a fix release with at least decorator stuff (if anypone can review
it?), wdyt?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*




2012/11/10 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

 +1

 regards,
 gerhard



 2012/11/10 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

  Hi folks!
 
  Removing functionality from webbeans-impl into an own module + changes in
  the API might be too big a change for a bugfix release.
 
  So I'd rather bump the minor version as well and work towards a 1.2.0.
  This would also allow us to finish the 85% finished move to ASM as well
 as
  finally committing the HierarchicScannerService and HierarchicBeanManager
  we need for properly supporting EARs.
 
  wdyt?
 
  LieGrue,
  strub