yes - it's non-intrusive because i fixed it.
however, we have a spi (ScannerService) for such additional features.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/13 Eric Covener
> Isn't the current code pretty non-intrusive and no behavior change by
> default?
>
> Is there something like a draft to cite that shows what overhaul in
> this area is due in 1.1?
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Mark Struberg (JIRA)
> Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:40 PM
> Subject: [jira] Commented: (OWB-472) archive centric beans.xml enabling
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
>
>
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994150#comment-12994150
> ]
>
> Mark Struberg commented on OWB-472:
> ---
>
> I fear we need to rollback the commits. The problem with this is that
> the whole BDA definition is UTTERLY broken in the spec. This resulted
> in a spec change which is due to 1.1. See CDI-18 for more information.
> By implementing the same sh**t than Weld currently has (they are
> forced to, but hey, we are not the RI ;) we just corrupt any normal
> modus operandi.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> > archive centric beans.xml enabling
> > ---
> >
> > Key: OWB-472
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472
> > Project: OpenWebBeans
> > Issue Type: Improvement
> > Components: Injection and Lookup
> >Reporter: Jacquelle Leggett
> >Assignee: Mark Struberg
> > Attachments: patch.txt
> >
> > Original Estimate: 336h
> > Remaining Estimate: 336h
> >
> > This issue was discussed in great detail in June (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openwebbeans-dev/201006.mbox/browser)
> on the developers forum. The title of the thread is "problems with lack of
> archive-centric BeanManager".
> > The main problem is described below (snippet from discussion):
> > "...Our current design does not permit either of the following
> scenarions, AFAICT:
> > b.jar and c.jar both enable the interceptor defined in a.jar
> > (treated as a duplicate)
> > Exactly one of b.jar and c.jar enables the interceptor defined in
> > a.jar (ends up enabled for beans from either archive if enabled in one
> > -- this is in the more troubling neighborhood)..."
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> cove...@gmail.com
>
