Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
+1 on the major for each spec version (like tomcat) is fine for me and avoid confusion with technical changes for the spec targeted spec version (1.1, 1.2 owb versions for instance) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-01-27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons. If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major version nr according the semantic versioning rules. We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this. LieGrue, strub On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: +1 for that But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion? My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0. Regards, Arne Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Antworten an: u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u...@openwebbeans.apache.org, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11 An: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, openwebbeans-user u...@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk Hi folks! We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already. I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward. I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. LieGrue, strub
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. +1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
+1 while the 1.2.2 is not forgotten, thanks Mark! Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-01-26 Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com: I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. +1
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
+1 for that But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion? My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0. Regards, Arne Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.demailto:strub...@yahoo.de Antworten an: u...@openwebbeans.apache.orgmailto:u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u...@openwebbeans.apache.orgmailto:u...@openwebbeans.apache.org, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.demailto:strub...@yahoo.de Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11 An: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.orgmailto:dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, openwebbeans-user u...@openwebbeans.apache.orgmailto:u...@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk Hi folks! We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already. I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward. I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. LieGrue, strub https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/branches/owb_1.1.x/
Re: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk
Depends on the arguments. Both has pros and cons. If we do an api incompatible change, then classically you push the major version nr according the semantic versioning rules. We might not often use the minor version number as we did in owb 1.0.x, 1.1.x and 1.2.x. But sometimes there is a need for this. LieGrue, strub On Monday, 27 January 2014, 8:49, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote: +1 for that But we should discuss the version of trunk. I remember that we discussed that in november, too. Did we come to a conclusion? My opinion is to give version 1.3 to trunk and let openwebbeans 2.0 implement CDI 2.0. Regards, Arne Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Antworten an: u...@openwebbeans.apache.org u...@openwebbeans.apache.org, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Datum: Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014 15:11 An: openwebbeans-dev dev@openwebbeans.apache.org, openwebbeans-user u...@openwebbeans.apache.org Betreff: targetting CDI-1.1 in trunk Hi folks! We did discuss the question where to fully implement cdi-1.1 back in November already. I believe it's finally time to do it. We finally need to move this forward. I suggest we move the current trunk to an owb_1.2.x branch and move our trunk to target the new CDI-1.1 MR release (as discussed in November already). Then I'll go on and cut an owb-1.2.2 release from the branch. LieGrue, strub
