Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes (v1.0.0, rc1)
[x] +1 Approve the release Release verification checklist for reference: [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. [x] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project policy [1]. [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. Verified with rcverify and spot checks of the tar ball. -r > ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-deploy-kube 'OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes' 1.0.0 rc1 rcverify.sh (script SHA1: 9729 7EAF CC39 3EEF A6B3 4099 C159 DD29 88B2 DAEF) working in the following directory: /var/folders/q9/s3th42s53d34ftd5wvcypybrgn/T/tmp.cAWguLC7 fetching tarball and signatures from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1 fetching openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz... ok fetching openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.asc... ok fetching openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512... ok fetching apache license... ok fetching release keys... ok importing keys... ok (keys already imported (processed 8 unchanged 8)) unpacking tar ball... ok cloning scancode... ok computing sha512 for openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz... ok openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz: 7141D8A2 DBCEDC56 D3B30CDC 08F9DD4A 79877422 C5B7F266 B8113C4F 61C28307 58EF8305 A164039C 03BF8300 CB78B216 1528AA12 6AAF0431 A5F1F940 E72DEF69 validating sha512... passed verifying asc... passed (signed-by: Dave Grove ) verifying notice... passed verifying absence of DISCLAIMER.txt passed verifying license... passed verifying sources have proper headers... passed scanning for executable files... passed scanning for unexpected file types... passed scanning for archives... passed scanning for packages... passed scanning package.json for version match... passed (none detected) scanning package-lock.json for version match... passed (none detected) removing the scratch space (/var/folders/q9/s3th42s53d34ftd5wvcypybrgn/T/tmp.cAWguLC7)... ok On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:35 PM David P Grove wrote: > > > Hi, > > This is a call to vote on releasing version 1.0.0 release candidate rc1 of > the following project module with artifacts built from the Git repositories > and commit IDs listed below. > > * OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes: 67e93b1a2e1dd9a339fc7d3e93bd087ad0ff097b > > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/commits/67e93b1a2e1dd9a339fc7d3e93bd087ad0ff097b > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.asc > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512 > > This release is comprised of source code distribution only. > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the > checklist below: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=e28b538 > > Usage: > curl -s " > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=e28b538 > " -o rcverify.sh > chmod +x rcverify.sh > ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-deploy-kube 'OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes' 1.0.0 rc1 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > Release verification checklist for reference: > [ ] Download links are valid. > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project > policy [1]. > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md >
[VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes (v1.0.0, rc1)
Hi, This is a call to vote on releasing version 1.0.0 release candidate rc1 of the following project module with artifacts built from the Git repositories and commit IDs listed below. * OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes: 67e93b1a2e1dd9a339fc7d3e93bd087ad0ff097b https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/commits/67e93b1a2e1dd9a339fc7d3e93bd087ad0ff097b https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.asc https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwhisk/rc1/openwhisk-deploy-kube-1.0.0-sources.tar.gz.sha512 This release is comprised of source code distribution only. You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the checklist below: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=e28b538 Usage: curl -s " https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=e28b538 " -o rcverify.sh chmod +x rcverify.sh ./rcverify.sh openwhisk-deploy-kube 'OpenWhisk Deploy Kubernetes' 1.0.0 rc1 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... Release verification checklist for reference: [ ] Download links are valid. [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository. [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project policy [1]. [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. [1] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
Re: Free Travis-CI will go away for open source projects
If use of Kubernetes in CI is useful here, there's a thread on bui...@apache.org right now planning how to go about doing so. Note that GitHub Actions are also somewhat rate-limited across the ASF, so we might need some hybrid CI solutions depending on how long or frequently things are running. Moving from Travis is a good idea either way as it's even more rate-limited. On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 09:24, Carlos Santana wrote: > > Thanks for bringing it Martin > > Our current usage of Travis for OpenWhisk we use the ASF foundation > account, and Infra pays some amount $ to able to support so many builds by > many Apache projects. > > With that said I think the amount paid today might not cover all the builds > > I have used GitHub actions and I would +1 for OpenWhisk to move away from > Travis > > Github Actions are event driven you can have one action in one repo trigger > another one in another repo we can leverage this > > If you are going to get started don’t reinvent the wheel there are many > actions available in the open market place, things like reviewdog > > And avoid code duplication you can have the action definitions for > OpenWhisk specifics in a central repo and reference them from the other > repos > > —Carlos > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:15 AM Martin Henke wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > free Travis usage will be ending for open source projects end of the year. > > > > See: > > https://mailchi.mp/3d439eeb1098/travis-ciorg-is-moving-to-travis-cicom > > https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing > > > > Open source projects will migrated to trial accounts in travis-ci.com > > with some free budget. > > > > > For those of you who have been building on public repositories (on > > travis-ci.com, with no paid subscription), we will upgrade you to our > > trial (free) >plan with a 10K credit allotment (which allows around 1000 > > minutes in a Linux environment). > > > > It looks like our OW projects have to find other alternatives like GitHub > > Actions. > > > > Kind regards, > > Martin > > -- > Carlos Santana >
Re: Free Travis-CI will go away for open source projects
Thanks for bringing it Martin Our current usage of Travis for OpenWhisk we use the ASF foundation account, and Infra pays some amount $ to able to support so many builds by many Apache projects. With that said I think the amount paid today might not cover all the builds I have used GitHub actions and I would +1 for OpenWhisk to move away from Travis Github Actions are event driven you can have one action in one repo trigger another one in another repo we can leverage this If you are going to get started don’t reinvent the wheel there are many actions available in the open market place, things like reviewdog And avoid code duplication you can have the action definitions for OpenWhisk specifics in a central repo and reference them from the other repos —Carlos On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:15 AM Martin Henke wrote: > Hi, > > free Travis usage will be ending for open source projects end of the year. > > See: > https://mailchi.mp/3d439eeb1098/travis-ciorg-is-moving-to-travis-cicom > https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing > > Open source projects will migrated to trial accounts in travis-ci.com > with some free budget. > > > For those of you who have been building on public repositories (on > travis-ci.com, with no paid subscription), we will upgrade you to our > trial (free) >plan with a 10K credit allotment (which allows around 1000 > minutes in a Linux environment). > > It looks like our OW projects have to find other alternatives like GitHub > Actions. > > Kind regards, > Martin -- Carlos Santana
Free Travis-CI will go away for open source projects
Hi, free Travis usage will be ending for open source projects end of the year. See: https://mailchi.mp/3d439eeb1098/travis-ciorg-is-moving-to-travis-cicom https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing Open source projects will migrated to trial accounts in travis-ci.com with some free budget. > For those of you who have been building on public repositories (on > travis-ci.com, with no paid subscription), we will upgrade you to our trial > (free) >plan with a 10K credit allotment (which allows around 1000 minutes in > a Linux environment). It looks like our OW projects have to find other alternatives like GitHub Actions. Kind regards, Martin
