Re: Publishing a pre-release version of Standalone OpenWhisk
If we want a release for users to try, I think it would make sense to vote on an alpha release or similar. It’s not ideal to point users to unvetted releases, even if they’re early access. On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 07:17, Rodric Rabbah wrote: > It would certainly help in getting others to try it. > > Since the nightly builds are not releases and must not be labeled as > releases I think the issue you’re alluding to is not the same. > > -r > > > On Aug 1, 2019, at 4:57 AM, Chetan Mehrotra > wrote: > > > > Would it be useful to publish a pre-release version of Standalone > > OpenWhisk to simplify trials of this mode by users until we do a > > proper release of core repo? > > > > Currently I have a task open (#4525) to publish nightly release to > > Github org [1]. However based on some recent discussions I am not sure > > if its fine to push such nightly releases in automated way via Travis. > > > > Another option can be to push a snapshot build to Apache Maven repo > > [3] via some Jenkins job. However this work may take some time as we > > would need to upgrade Gradle to 5.x which has better Maven release > > support and which we need for supporting JDK 11 > > > > So was thinking to manually publish a pre-release build at [2] based > > on local build and eventually support publishing snapshot builds to > > Apache Maven repo > > > > Thoughts on what approach to take here? > > > > Chetan Mehrotra > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4525 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/releases > > [3] https://repository.apache.org/ > -- Matt Sicker
Re: Publishing a pre-release version of Standalone OpenWhisk
It would certainly help in getting others to try it. Since the nightly builds are not releases and must not be labeled as releases I think the issue you’re alluding to is not the same. -r > On Aug 1, 2019, at 4:57 AM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: > > Would it be useful to publish a pre-release version of Standalone > OpenWhisk to simplify trials of this mode by users until we do a > proper release of core repo? > > Currently I have a task open (#4525) to publish nightly release to > Github org [1]. However based on some recent discussions I am not sure > if its fine to push such nightly releases in automated way via Travis. > > Another option can be to push a snapshot build to Apache Maven repo > [3] via some Jenkins job. However this work may take some time as we > would need to upgrade Gradle to 5.x which has better Maven release > support and which we need for supporting JDK 11 > > So was thinking to manually publish a pre-release build at [2] based > on local build and eventually support publishing snapshot builds to > Apache Maven repo > > Thoughts on what approach to take here? > > Chetan Mehrotra > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4525 > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/releases > [3] https://repository.apache.org/
Publishing a pre-release version of Standalone OpenWhisk
Would it be useful to publish a pre-release version of Standalone OpenWhisk to simplify trials of this mode by users until we do a proper release of core repo? Currently I have a task open (#4525) to publish nightly release to Github org [1]. However based on some recent discussions I am not sure if its fine to push such nightly releases in automated way via Travis. Another option can be to push a snapshot build to Apache Maven repo [3] via some Jenkins job. However this work may take some time as we would need to upgrade Gradle to 5.x which has better Maven release support and which we need for supporting JDK 11 So was thinking to manually publish a pre-release build at [2] based on local build and eventually support publishing snapshot builds to Apache Maven repo Thoughts on what approach to take here? Chetan Mehrotra [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4525 [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/releases [3] https://repository.apache.org/
