Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
Hi, On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:35 AM Alexander Klimetschek wrote: > ...Note that the granted source code zip [1] still has the Adobe copyright > headers. > We would have to remove/replace them. Bertrand told me that I would have to > do this > during the contribution process... Yes, as per https://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html, it's best to have those copyright headers removed and that must be done by "the copyright owner (or owner's agent)", so those modifications should be done by an Adobe employee. OTOH I think it's fair for to add a mention of such contributions to the CREDITS.txt file [1]. -Bertrand [1] https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CREDITS.txt -Bertrand
Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
Hi David, I just sent the signed grant to the secretary (cc'ed you). Great to see that the dependencies are all ok wrt their licenses! Note that the granted source code zip [1] still has the Adobe copyright headers. We would have to remove/replace them. Bertrand told me that I would have to do this during the contribution process, I assume when committing this (exact) source code to a new openwhisk repo. Let me know what else I can do! Otherwise I assume I'll have to wait for the PMC's vote on the contribution. [1] https://github.com/adobe/wskdebug/archive/v1.1.2.zip Cheers, Alex From: David P Grove Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 06:55 To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Subject: RE: [Contribution] wskdebug Hi Alex, Thanks for pushing this forward! Once the grant is submitted to the ASF secretary we can push ahead with the formal process. Thanks for filling in more of the wskdebug.xml; I updated the version in the incubator svn repository to match. For the license check, the critical list is the production dependencies (what is required to run the released module). Dev dependencies are not blockers because end users do not need dev dependencies to use the released software. From your attached list the production dependency licenses are: - MIT: 99 - ISC: 20 - Apache-2.0: 8 - BSD-3-Clause: 3 - BSD-2-Clause: 3 - MIT*: 2 - Custom: http://github.com/substack/node-bufferlist: 1 (effectively MIT) - AFLv2.1,BSD: 1 - Unlicense: 1 MIT, ISC, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, BSD-2-Clause, Unlicense, are all "Category A" licenses [1]. All fine. AFLv3.0 is a "Category A" license. AFLv2.1 is not listed in any category at [1]. However, the one package with that license [2] is dual-licensed as either BSD-3-Clause or AFLv2.1. Since BSD-3 is Category A, we are fine. So, I see no license issues. Everything is Category-A. --dave [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html [2] https://github.com/kriszyp/json-schema/blob/master/LICENSE
RE: [Contribution] wskdebug
Hi Alex, Thanks for pushing this forward! Once the grant is submitted to the ASF secretary we can push ahead with the formal process. Thanks for filling in more of the wskdebug.xml; I updated the version in the incubator svn repository to match. For the license check, the critical list is the production dependencies (what is required to run the released module). Dev dependencies are not blockers because end users do not need dev dependencies to use the released software. From your attached list the production dependency licenses are: - MIT: 99 - ISC: 20 - Apache-2.0: 8 - BSD-3-Clause: 3 - BSD-2-Clause: 3 - MIT*: 2 - Custom: http://github.com/substack/node-bufferlist: 1 (effectively MIT) - AFLv2.1,BSD: 1 - Unlicense: 1 MIT, ISC, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause, BSD-2-Clause, Unlicense, are all "Category A" licenses [1]. All fine. AFLv3.0 is a "Category A" license. AFLv2.1 is not listed in any category at [1]. However, the one package with that license [2] is dual-licensed as either BSD-3-Clause or AFLv2.1. Since BSD-3 is Category A, we are fine. So, I see no license issues. Everything is Category-A. --dave [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html [2] https://github.com/kriszyp/json-schema/blob/master/LICENSE
Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
FYI, a little status update: we are going through the internal legal process for a grant to ASF. Both contributors have signed the ICLA (check) but there might be a few more steps necessary that will take a few days. We will update the IP clearance document once we reach that. Thanks, Alex From: David P Grove Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 14:56 To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Cc: Jesse MacFadyen ; Fil Maj ; Moritz Raho ; Shazron Abdullah ; Simon Mac Donald Subject: RE: [Contribution] wskdebug Alexander Klimetschek wrote on 08/13/2019 05:06:54 PM: > > thanks. The IP clearance page says "The receiving PMC is responsible > for doing the work." but I am happy to help if there is anything I can do. > Hi. Sorry, I could have done a better job of telling you what I needed you to do. The quoted text really means "the Incubator PMC is _not_responsible for doing any of the work." We still need the people making the donation to do some work as they are the ones who know the history of the code and have the legal standing to donate it. I created a draft IP clearance record at [1]. I can drive the mechanics of the Apache process, but I need your help with (a) a brief description of the code base (b) submitting the appropriate software grant (based on the set of contributors to wskdebug) and (c) completing the sections of the "Copyright" and "Verify distribution rights" of the IP clearance form. --dave [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/openwhisk-wskdebug.xml
RE: [Contribution] wskdebug
Alexander Klimetschek wrote on 08/13/2019 05:06:54 PM: > > thanks. The IP clearance page says "The receiving PMC is responsible > for doing the work." but I am happy to help if there is anything I can do. > Hi. Sorry, I could have done a better job of telling you what I needed you to do. The quoted text really means "the Incubator PMC is _not_responsible for doing any of the work." We still need the people making the donation to do some work as they are the ones who know the history of the code and have the legal standing to donate it. I created a draft IP clearance record at [1]. I can drive the mechanics of the Apache process, but I need your help with (a) a brief description of the code base (b) submitting the appropriate software grant (based on the set of contributors to wskdebug) and (c) completing the sections of the "Copyright" and "Verify distribution rights" of the IP clearance form. --dave [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/openwhisk-wskdebug.xml
Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
A software grant will be needed for the donation to be accepted, for one. On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 16:07, Alexander Klimetschek wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > thanks. The IP clearance page says "The receiving PMC is responsible for > doing the work." but I am happy to help if there is anything I can do. > > The entire codebase is available and can be cloned from > https://github.com/adobe/wskdebug > > Cheers, > Alex > > > From: David P Grove > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 13:40 > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > Cc: Jesse MacFadyen ; Fil Maj ; Moritz Raho > ; Shazron Abdullah ; Simon Mac Donald > > Subject: Re: [Contribution] wskdebug > > > > Alexander Klimetschek wrote on 08/08/2019 12:27:57 AM: > > > > Hi OpenWhisk team, > > > > after presenting wskdebug in today's community call I would like > > to formally start the contribution process. There was agreement in > > the call to accept a contribution into Apache OpenWhisk. > > Great! > > The IP clearance process is described at [1]. The next steps would be get > a snapshot of the code together and fill out the IP Clearance form > describing it. > > --dave > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ -- Matt Sicker
Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
Hi Dave, thanks. The IP clearance page says "The receiving PMC is responsible for doing the work." but I am happy to help if there is anything I can do. The entire codebase is available and can be cloned from https://github.com/adobe/wskdebug Cheers, Alex From: David P Grove Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 13:40 To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org Cc: Jesse MacFadyen ; Fil Maj ; Moritz Raho ; Shazron Abdullah ; Simon Mac Donald Subject: Re: [Contribution] wskdebug Alexander Klimetschek wrote on 08/08/2019 12:27:57 AM: > > Hi OpenWhisk team, > > after presenting wskdebug in today's community call I would like > to formally start the contribution process. There was agreement in > the call to accept a contribution into Apache OpenWhisk. Great! The IP clearance process is described at [1]. The next steps would be get a snapshot of the code together and fill out the IP Clearance form describing it. --dave [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
Re: [Contribution] wskdebug
Alexander Klimetschek wrote on 08/08/2019 12:27:57 AM: > > Hi OpenWhisk team, > > after presenting wskdebug in today's community call I would like > to formally start the contribution process. There was agreement in > the call to accept a contribution into Apache OpenWhisk. Great! The IP clearance process is described at [1]. The next steps would be get a snapshot of the code together and fill out the IP Clearance form describing it. --dave [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
