PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license

2013-01-16 Thread Maruan Sahyoun
Hi,

as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from a pdf 
form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant ASF license. 
Would someone know how to do it?

With kind regards


Maruan Sahyoun



Re: PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license

2013-01-17 Thread Timo Boehme

Hi,

Am 16.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:


as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from
a pdf form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant
ASF license. Would someone know how to do it?


there was an update to JIRA in August 2012 which removed the checkbox.
In an email on infrastruct...@apache.org Doug Cutting explained:

"2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed
projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was
only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a
contribution.

  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions

3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment
stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution."


Best regards,

Timo

--

 Timo Boehme
 OntoChem GmbH
 H.-Damerow-Str. 4
 06120 Halle/Saale
 T: +49 345 4780474
 F: +49 345 4780471
 timo.boe...@ontochem.com

_

 OntoChem GmbH
 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber
 Sitz: Halle / Saale
 Registergericht: Stendal
 Registernummer: HRB 215461
_



Re: PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license

2013-01-17 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Hi,


Am 17.01.2013 09:09, schrieb Timo Boehme:

Hi,

Am 16.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:


as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from
a pdf form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant
ASF license. Would someone know how to do it?


there was an update to JIRA in August 2012 which removed the checkbox.
In an email on infrastruct...@apache.org Doug Cutting explained:

"2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed
projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was
only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a
contribution.

   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions

3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment
stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution."

Thanks for the explanation Timo!

IMHO there is one exception. If it is a substantial contribution, e.g.
a bunch of new classes or a rewrite of a part of the software, we will ask the 
contributor to sign a CLA.



Best regards,

Timo



BR
Andreas Lehmkühler