PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license
Hi, as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from a pdf form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant ASF license. Would someone know how to do it? With kind regards Maruan Sahyoun
Re: PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license
Hi, Am 16.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from a pdf form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant ASF license. Would someone know how to do it? there was an update to JIRA in August 2012 which removed the checkbox. In an email on infrastruct...@apache.org Doug Cutting explained: "2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a contribution. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions 3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution." Best regards, Timo -- Timo Boehme OntoChem GmbH H.-Damerow-Str. 4 06120 Halle/Saale T: +49 345 4780474 F: +49 345 4780471 timo.boe...@ontochem.com _ OntoChem GmbH Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber Sitz: Halle / Saale Registergericht: Stendal Registernummer: HRB 215461 _
Re: PDFBOX-1492 Grant ASF license
Hi, Am 17.01.2013 09:09, schrieb Timo Boehme: Hi, Am 16.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: as part of PDFBOX-1492 I added a small patch to extract the XFA from a pdf form. Unfortunately I can't find the button/checkbox … to grant ASF license. Would someone know how to do it? there was an update to JIRA in August 2012 which removed the checkbox. In an email on infrastruct...@apache.org Doug Cutting explained: "2. According to the Apache license, contributions to Apache-licensed projects are under the Apache license by default, so the checkbox was only useful to specify that an attachment was *not* intended to be a contribution. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#contributions 3. In the future, without the checkbox, one may instead add a comment stating when an attachment is not intended for contribution." Thanks for the explanation Timo! IMHO there is one exception. If it is a substantial contribution, e.g. a bunch of new classes or a rewrite of a part of the software, we will ask the contributor to sign a CLA. Best regards, Timo BR Andreas Lehmkühler