Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
It was really meant as a joke. Hope no one was insulted. Funny thing though, Apache's status page showed nothing. Have a great day, C.D. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:54 PM Tilman Hausherr wrote: > On 10.07.2024 09:46, Constantine Dokolas wrote: > > It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... > > It's back. Also I don't think it was him, there was no website related > posting. > > Tilman >
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
I've fixed the tagging issue. I mixed up the pom when reverting the release preparation :-( Now I'm facing another issue. Maven runs in a wrong order. It tries to gather all build artifacts at the beginning of the process before they are built. Still investigating ... Sorry for the delay Andreas Am 10.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the release:prepare goal I'm still searching :-( Andreas Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
On 10.07.2024 09:46, Constantine Dokolas wrote: It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... It's back. Also I don't think it was him, there was no website related posting. Tilman
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
I've to correct myself: lucene.apache.org seems to be a bad example: https://lucene.apache.org/core/ works; other projects work as well, e.g. https://tika.apache.org/ Thus it seems pdfbox really has a problem. Best regards, Timo Am 10.07.24 um 09:54 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: Yikes! C.D. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:52 AM Timo Boehme wrote: No, its the whole X.apache.org which is currently not available (e.g. lucene.apache.org). Best regards, Timo Am 10.07.24 um 09:46 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... C.D. -- There is a computer disease that anybody who works with computers knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is that you 'play' with them! - Richard P. Feynman On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:00 AM Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the release:prepare goal I'm still searching :-( Andreas Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Yikes! C.D. On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:52 AM Timo Boehme wrote: > No, its the whole X.apache.org which is currently not available (e.g. > lucene.apache.org). > > Best regards, > Timo > > > Am 10.07.24 um 09:46 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: > > It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... > > > > C.D. > > > > -- > > There is a computer disease that anybody who works with computers knows > > about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the > > work. The trouble with computers is that you 'play' with them! > > - Richard P. Feynman > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:00 AM Andreas Lehmkühler > > > wrote: > > > >> There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the > >> release:prepare goal > >> > >> I'm still searching :-( > >> > >> Andreas > >> > >> Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > >>> It is still tricky but I'm on it. > >>> > >>> Sorry for the noise > >>> > >>> Andreas > >>> > >>> Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > There is an issue with the changes from > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 > > > I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first > > Sorry for the inconvenience > > Andreas > > Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > > Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... > > > > Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > >> Last one: > >> > >> > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz > >> This is because the last change I made yesterday. > >> > >> Tilman > >> > >> On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > >>> Result: > >>> > >> > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz > >>> to be compared against > >>> > >>> > >> https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz > >>> I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This > >>> might be because of the path names or some meta data. > >>> > >>> Tilman > >>> > >>> On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > Hi, > > I've just started a new "B" test. > > Tilman > > On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 > > I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. > > > > Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? > > > > There some related changes such as > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent > > refactoring in fontbox. > > > > Andreas > > > > > > Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > >> Result: > >> > >> > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz > >> From what I see, nothing to do. > >> And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 > >> hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). > >> > >> Tilman > >> > >> On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > >>> I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the > >>> change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox > >>> change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are > >>> other problems. > >>> > >>> Tilman > >>> > >>> On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 > > I hope that it's all the same problem. > > Tilman > > On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > > Thanks for running the tests. > > > > the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text > > extraction issue. > > > > commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI > > > > some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were > > "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th > > remaining part looks good to me. > > > > > > cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf > > > > ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but > > 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of > > the content. > > > > I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more > > > > Andreas > > > > > > Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > >> https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz > >> No new exceptions
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
No, its the whole X.apache.org which is currently not available (e.g. lucene.apache.org). Best regards, Timo Am 10.07.24 um 09:46 schrieb Constantine Dokolas: It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... C.D. -- There is a computer disease that anybody who works with computers knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is that you 'play' with them! - Richard P. Feynman On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:00 AM Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the release:prepare goal I'm still searching :-( Andreas Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
It seems like you managed to take down pdfbox.apache.org... C.D. -- There is a computer disease that anybody who works with computers knows about. It's a very serious disease and it interferes completely with the work. The trouble with computers is that you 'play' with them! - Richard P. Feynman On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:00 AM Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the > release:prepare goal > > I'm still searching :-( > > Andreas > > Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > > It is still tricky but I'm on it. > > > > Sorry for the noise > > > > Andreas > > > > Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > >> There is an issue with the changes from > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 > >> > >> > >> I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first > >> > >> Sorry for the inconvenience > >> > >> Andreas > >> > >> Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > >>> Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... > >>> > >>> Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > Last one: > > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz > > This is because the last change I made yesterday. > > Tilman > > On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > Result: > > > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz > > > > to be compared against > > > > > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz > > > > I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This > > might be because of the path names or some meta data. > > > > Tilman > > > > On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've just started a new "B" test. > >> > >> Tilman > >> > >> On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 > >>> I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. > >>> > >>> Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? > >>> > >>> There some related changes such as > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent > >>> refactoring in fontbox. > >>> > >>> Andreas > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > Result: > > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz > > From what I see, nothing to do. > And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 > hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). > > Tilman > > On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the > > change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox > > change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are > > other problems. > > > > Tilman > > > > On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > >> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 > >> > >> I hope that it's all the same problem. > >> > >> Tilman > >> > >> On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > >>> Thanks for running the tests. > >>> > >>> the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text > >>> extraction issue. > >>> > >>> commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI > >>> > >>> some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were > >>> "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th > >>> remaining part looks good to me. > >>> > >>> > >>> cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf > >>> > >>> ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but > >>> 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of > >>> the content. > >>> > >>> I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more > >>> > >>> Andreas > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > > https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz > > No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't > investigated yet. > > Tilman > > On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: > > I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll > > have the results tomorrow. > > > > Tilman > > > > On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: > >> Thanks for the update. > >> > >> I'm
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
There is some issue with tagging the release when executing the release:prepare goal I'm still searching :-( Andreas Am 09.07.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
It is still tricky but I'm on it. Sorry for the noise Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 20:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
There is an issue with the changes from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5789 I've to postpone the release to solve the issue first Sorry for the inconvenience Andreas Am 08.07.24 um 19:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Looks good to me, I'm starting the release process ... Am 08.07.24 um 08:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Last one: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_4.tar.xz This is because the last change I made yesterday. Tilman On 06.07.2024 19:17, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
@Tilman Thanks again for running the tests. Looks good to me, so that I'm planning to cut the release tomorrow evening in about 28 hours from now. Andreas Am 06.07.24 um 19:17 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_3.tar.xz to be compared against https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz I couldn't find a difference visually except the file sizes. This might be because of the path names or some meta data. Tilman On 06.07.2024 14:19, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Hi, I've just started a new "B" test. Tilman On 06.07.2024 13:29, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Hi, after closing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I'd like to finally cut the 2.0.32 release. Do we need a new regression test due the latest changes? There some related changes such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5843 and the recent refactoring in fontbox. Andreas Am 14.06.24 um 13:03 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Result: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32_2.tar.xz From what I see, nothing to do. And I know the time it takes: 3 hours for the A (or B) test, 1 hour to create the A vs B report (tika-eval). Tilman On 14.06.2024 08:47, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
I'll repeat the regression tests with locally reverting the change from PDFBOX-5790 but locally adding my proposed xmpbox change from PDFBOX-5835. This way we'll know whether there are other problems. Tilman On 13.06.2024 19:23, Tilman Hausherr wrote: See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5838 I hope that it's all the same problem. Tilman On 13.06.2024 18:30, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Thanks for running the tests. the exceptions part looks good, but I'm afraid we have a text extraction issue. commoncrawl3_refetched/JA/JA77WEHMKS2T5LCXM42OXFJ3OSBNRDTI some of the special characters changed. In 2.0.31 the were "omitted" and in 2.0.32 there is some special char. But th remaining part looks good to me. cc-main-2021-31-pdf-untruncated/0085/0085885.pdf ist seems to contain some special characters as well, but 2.0.31 is able to extract them. 2.0.32 seems to mix some of the content. I guess it is somehow font related. Need to investigate more Andreas Am 12.06.24 um 20:23 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
https://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.31_vs_2.0.32.tar.xz No new exceptions but many content differences. I haven't investigated yet. Tilman On 12.06.2024 11:31, Tilman Hausherr wrote: I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
I've started the tests. If there aren't any troubles I'll have the results tomorrow. Tilman On 05.06.2024 08:07, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
Thanks for the update. I'm going to postpone the release as I'll need any helping hand I can get. Andreas Am 02.06.24 um 14:22 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
Re: PDFBox 2.0.32 release
+1 but I won't be able to help with tests this time Tilman On 01.06.2024 12:15, Andreas Lehmkühler wrote: Hi, IMHO it is time to cut another 2.0.x release. I'm planing to do so in a week or so? Any objections or is there something we should add/fix first? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
