Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on pdfbox-trunk

2010-05-31 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi,

[dropped bui...@]

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de wrote:
 If the rat-report is needed, we should run it in our hudson
 environment. Any pointers how to do that?

I've done this before for Jackrabbit, and can easily add the same for
PDFBox. See PDFBOX-735 and JCR-1937.

BR,

Jukka Zitting


Re: Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on pdfbox-trunk

2010-05-31 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi Jukka,

- original Nachricht 
Betreff: Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on pdfbox-trunk
Gesendet: Mo, 31. Mai 2010
Von: Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com

 Hi,
 
 [dropped bui...@]
 
 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Lehmkuehler andr...@lehmi.de
 wrote:
  If the rat-report is needed, we should run it in our hudson
  environment. Any pointers how to do that?
 
 I've done this before for Jackrabbit, and can easily add the same for
 PDFBox. See PDFBOX-735 and JCR-1937.
+1, thanks in advance

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler


Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on pdfbox-trunk

2010-05-30 Thread Andreas Lehmkuehler

Hi,

build...@apache.org schrieb:

The Buildbot has detected a restored build of pdfbox-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/pdfbox-trunk/builds/1

Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/

Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu

Build Reason: forced: by IRC user gmcdonald on channel #asftest: test RAT  site 
 maven build
Build Source Stamp: HEAD
Blamelist: 


since 2008 we are using hudson to build pdfbox. Why was the buildbot job 
created/reactivated? Because of the rat-report discussion on bo...@?

IMO it doesn't make sense to have 2 different build jobs. If the rat-report
is needed, we should run it in our hudson environment.
Any pointers how to do that?

BR
Andreas Lehmkühler