[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-17 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.008.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.005.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.006.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.007.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.008.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 4.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-16 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.007.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.005.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.006.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.007.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 4.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-14 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.006.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.005.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.006.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 2h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-08 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.005.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.005.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 2.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-02 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.004.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-01 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5928.4.x.003.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-5928) Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations

2020-06-01 Thread Kadir OZDEMIR (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kadir OZDEMIR updated PHOENIX-5928:
---
Attachment: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch

> Index rebuilds without replaying data table mutations
> -
>
> Key: PHOENIX-5928
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5928
> Project: Phoenix
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0, 4.14.3
>Reporter: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Assignee: Kadir OZDEMIR
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-5928.4.x.001.patch, PHOENIX-5928.4.x.002.patch
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Index rebuilds are done currently by reading data table mutations (in 
> UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver) and then replaying them on the data table 
> (in IndexRegionObser) -- without actually applying mutations on the data 
> table -- in order to generate the corresponding index mutations and apply 
> them on index tables. IndexRegionObserver sets the operation status for these 
> data table mutations to NOWRITE so that they are ignored by HBase after 
> generating index table mutations from these data table mutations. Since we do 
> not apply these mutations on the data table, there is no need to send these 
> mutations to the data table regions if index mutations are generated and sent 
> to index tables by UngroupedAggregateRegionObserver. By doing so, we 
> eliminate going through data table update path and its overhead (its 
> interaction with flushes, row locking etc). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)