Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Joe Witt
+1 on the report

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Billie Rinaldi  wrote:
> Looks good to me. The important issues section typically contains items
> from the graduation preparation list [1], and releases and community
> building are the most common issues that podlings are working towards
> addressing. So you're right on track there. Another good one is completing
> the podling name search.
>
> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#checklist
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
> eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mentors,
>>
>> Can you please review the following draft Pirk podling report? I will post
>> it on the incubator report wiki once everyone is happy with it.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ellison Anne
>>
>> **
>>
>> Pirk
>>
>> Pirk is a framework for scalable Private Information Retrieval (PIR).
>>
>> Pirk has been incubating since 2016-06-17. The initial code for Pirk was
>> granted on 2016-07-11.
>>
>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>>   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
>> dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
>> development process.
>>
>>   2. Establish a process which allows different release cycles for the core
>> framework, extensions/adaptors, and additional algorithms.
>>
>>   3. Grow the community to establish diversity of background and expertise.
>>
>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> aware of?
>>
>> None.
>>
>> How has the community developed since the last report?
>>
>> The mailing list activity, pull requests, and page views to the Apache Pirk
>> website (via Google Analytics) have greatly increased since the last
>> report.
>>
>> How has the project developed since the last report?
>>
>> The project has ensured that all dependencies are compliant with the Apache
>> License version 2.0 and that all code and documentation artifacts have the
>> correct Apache licensing markings and notice. The project has also
>> undertaken a refactor of some of the initial packages and provided more
>> robust support for user interaction.
>>
>> Date of last release:
>>
>>   No releases have been made yet.
>>
>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>>
>> Pirk is operating with its initial committers and PMC and has not yet
>> elected new committers or PMC members.
>>


Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Tim Ellison
On 29 July 2016 at 19:17, Ellison Anne Williams 
wrote:

> Tim had submitted a JIRA request for the Pirk podling name search on
> 6.28.16:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-108
>
> However, it is still unassigned and thus unresolved/open. What do we need
> to do in order to move it along?
>

Drop a note to tradema...@apache.org, and cc: the private Pirk mailing
list, asking for an interpretation and approval of the information in that
JIRA.

I only say the 'private' Pirk list because trademarks@ is a private list,
and it is not appropriate to be mixing private and public lists in a
conversation.

Regards,
Tim


Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Ellison Anne Williams
Hi Billie,

Tim had submitted a JIRA request for the Pirk podling name search on
6.28.16:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-108

However, it is still unassigned and thus unresolved/open. What do we need
to do in order to move it along?




On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Billie Rinaldi  wrote:

> Looks good to me. The important issues section typically contains items
> from the graduation preparation list [1], and releases and community
> building are the most common issues that podlings are working towards
> addressing. So you're right on track there. Another good one is completing
> the podling name search.
>
> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#checklist
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
> eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mentors,
> >
> > Can you please review the following draft Pirk podling report? I will
> post
> > it on the incubator report wiki once everyone is happy with it.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Ellison Anne
> >
> > **
> >
> > Pirk
> >
> > Pirk is a framework for scalable Private Information Retrieval (PIR).
> >
> > Pirk has been incubating since 2016-06-17. The initial code for Pirk was
> > granted on 2016-07-11.
> >
> > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> >
> >   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
> > dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
> > development process.
> >
> >   2. Establish a process which allows different release cycles for the
> core
> > framework, extensions/adaptors, and additional algorithms.
> >
> >   3. Grow the community to establish diversity of background and
> expertise.
> >
> > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> > aware of?
> >
> > None.
> >
> > How has the community developed since the last report?
> >
> > The mailing list activity, pull requests, and page views to the Apache
> Pirk
> > website (via Google Analytics) have greatly increased since the last
> > report.
> >
> > How has the project developed since the last report?
> >
> > The project has ensured that all dependencies are compliant with the
> Apache
> > License version 2.0 and that all code and documentation artifacts have
> the
> > correct Apache licensing markings and notice. The project has also
> > undertaken a refactor of some of the initial packages and provided more
> > robust support for user interaction.
> >
> > Date of last release:
> >
> >   No releases have been made yet.
> >
> > When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> >
> > Pirk is operating with its initial committers and PMC and has not yet
> > elected new committers or PMC members.
> >
>


Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Suneel Marthi
+1 from me.

Given the activity on the project over the past few weeks, should we start
planning for a first Apache release (say mid-August).

Suneel

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mentors,
>
> Can you please review the following draft Pirk podling report? I will post
> it on the incubator report wiki once everyone is happy with it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ellison Anne
>
> **
>
> Pirk
>
> Pirk is a framework for scalable Private Information Retrieval (PIR).
>
> Pirk has been incubating since 2016-06-17. The initial code for Pirk was
> granted on 2016-07-11.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
> dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
> development process.
>
>   2. Establish a process which allows different release cycles for the core
> framework, extensions/adaptors, and additional algorithms.
>
>   3. Grow the community to establish diversity of background and expertise.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
> None.
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> The mailing list activity, pull requests, and page views to the Apache Pirk
> website (via Google Analytics) have greatly increased since the last
> report.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
> The project has ensured that all dependencies are compliant with the Apache
> License version 2.0 and that all code and documentation artifacts have the
> correct Apache licensing markings and notice. The project has also
> undertaken a refactor of some of the initial packages and provided more
> robust support for user interaction.
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   No releases have been made yet.
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
> Pirk is operating with its initial committers and PMC and has not yet
> elected new committers or PMC members.
>


Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Billie Rinaldi
Looks good to me. The important issues section typically contains items
from the graduation preparation list [1], and releases and community
building are the most common issues that podlings are working towards
addressing. So you're right on track there. Another good one is completing
the podling name search.

[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#checklist

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Ellison Anne Williams <
eawilliamsp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mentors,
>
> Can you please review the following draft Pirk podling report? I will post
> it on the incubator report wiki once everyone is happy with it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ellison Anne
>
> **
>
> Pirk
>
> Pirk is a framework for scalable Private Information Retrieval (PIR).
>
> Pirk has been incubating since 2016-06-17. The initial code for Pirk was
> granted on 2016-07-11.
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
>   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
> dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
> development process.
>
>   2. Establish a process which allows different release cycles for the core
> framework, extensions/adaptors, and additional algorithms.
>
>   3. Grow the community to establish diversity of background and expertise.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
> None.
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> The mailing list activity, pull requests, and page views to the Apache Pirk
> website (via Google Analytics) have greatly increased since the last
> report.
>
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>
> The project has ensured that all dependencies are compliant with the Apache
> License version 2.0 and that all code and documentation artifacts have the
> correct Apache licensing markings and notice. The project has also
> undertaken a refactor of some of the initial packages and provided more
> robust support for user interaction.
>
> Date of last release:
>
>   No releases have been made yet.
>
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>
> Pirk is operating with its initial committers and PMC and has not yet
> elected new committers or PMC members.
>


Re: For Review -- Draft August Podling Report

2016-07-29 Thread Tim Ellison
On 29/07/16 15:33, Ellison Anne Williams wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
> 
> Can you please review the following draft Pirk podling report? I will post
> it on the incubator report wiki once everyone is happy with it.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ellison Anne
> 
> **
> 
> Pirk
> 
> Pirk is a framework for scalable Private Information Retrieval (PIR).
> 
> Pirk has been incubating since 2016-06-17. The initial code for Pirk was
> granted on 2016-07-11.
> 
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> 
>   1. Establish a formal release process and schedule, allowing for
> dependable release cycles in a manner consistent with the Apache
> development process.
> 
>   2. Establish a process which allows different release cycles for the core
> framework, extensions/adaptors, and additional algorithms.
> 
>   3. Grow the community to establish diversity of background and expertise.
> 
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> 
> None.
> 
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> 
> The mailing list activity, pull requests, and page views to the Apache Pirk
> website (via Google Analytics) have greatly increased since the last
> report.
> 
> How has the project developed since the last report?
> 
> The project has ensured that all dependencies are compliant with the Apache
> License version 2.0 and that all code and documentation artifacts have the
> correct Apache licensing markings and notice. The project has also
> undertaken a refactor of some of the initial packages and provided more
> robust support for user interaction.
> 
> Date of last release:
> 
>   No releases have been made yet.
> 
> When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
> 
> Pirk is operating with its initial committers and PMC and has not yet
> elected new committers or PMC members.
> 

+1 from me.