Re: Host PIO on Github (not ASF Git)

[Jeff Zhang]

AFAIK,  some apache projects (spark/zeppelin) use github as mirror but
still based on apache git. People can still use github to submit/review PR.
But they need to call a script to merget this PR.

See https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/dev/merge_zeppelin_pr.py




Pat Ferrel 于2017年5月20日周六 上午12:42写道：

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14191
>
>
> On May 18, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Pat Ferrel  wrote:
>
> Heard it from Mahout. I agree it’s not completely clear. Unless someone
> can illuminate us I’ll follow up with infra and report back.
>
> BTW I forgot my ASF login, does anyone remember the ASF site for forgotten
> passwords?
>
>
> On May 18, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Donald Szeto  wrote:
>
> It is not clear to me from the gitbox page that we can move our source out
> of ASF controlled servers and still be covered by ASF Legal. It's a pretty
> big change if true. Did I miss an announcement from ASF?
>
> Personally am happy to have things on GitHub because the flow would be a
> lot simpler.
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:26 PM Pat Ferrel  wrote:
>
> BTW there seems now to be a way to host on Github (not ASF Git) by linking
> our ASF accounts to our git accounts. This would make a bunch of things
> much easier like PRs can be reviewed and merged directly,  direct merging
> of doc changes by users, lots of nice stuff that is GUI related.  This
> would open up a whole new toolchain unless there are some hidden
> restrictions and unless I’m misreading something.
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
> Even given the risk of GH going down I’d take it over forcing the poor
> Infra people to guarantee some SLA for our own git servers. They must have
> a zillion more interesting things to do.
>
> I’d be happy to shepherd the Infra Jira if people want this. What do
> people think?
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Host PIO on Github (not ASF Git)

[Pat Ferrel]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14191 



On May 18, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Pat Ferrel  wrote:

Heard it from Mahout. I agree it’s not completely clear. Unless someone can 
illuminate us I’ll follow up with infra and report back.

BTW I forgot my ASF login, does anyone remember the ASF site for forgotten 
passwords?


On May 18, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Donald Szeto  wrote:

It is not clear to me from the gitbox page that we can move our source out
of ASF controlled servers and still be covered by ASF Legal. It's a pretty
big change if true. Did I miss an announcement from ASF?

Personally am happy to have things on GitHub because the flow would be a
lot simpler.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:26 PM Pat Ferrel  wrote:

> BTW there seems now to be a way to host on Github (not ASF Git) by linking
> our ASF accounts to our git accounts. This would make a bunch of things
> much easier like PRs can be reviewed and merged directly,  direct merging
> of doc changes by users, lots of nice stuff that is GUI related.  This
> would open up a whole new toolchain unless there are some hidden
> restrictions and unless I’m misreading something.
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/
> 
> Even given the risk of GH going down I’d take it over forcing the poor
> Infra people to guarantee some SLA for our own git servers. They must have
> a zillion more interesting things to do.
> 
> I’d be happy to shepherd the Infra Jira if people want this. What do
> people think?
> 
> 

Re: Host PIO on Github (not ASF Git)

[Pat Ferrel]

Heard it from Mahout. I agree it’s not completely clear. Unless someone can 
illuminate us I’ll follow up with infra and report back.

BTW I forgot my ASF login, does anyone remember the ASF site for forgotten 
passwords?


On May 18, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Donald Szeto  wrote:

It is not clear to me from the gitbox page that we can move our source out
of ASF controlled servers and still be covered by ASF Legal. It's a pretty
big change if true. Did I miss an announcement from ASF?

Personally am happy to have things on GitHub because the flow would be a
lot simpler.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:26 PM Pat Ferrel  wrote:

> BTW there seems now to be a way to host on Github (not ASF Git) by linking
> our ASF accounts to our git accounts. This would make a bunch of things
> much easier like PRs can be reviewed and merged directly,  direct merging
> of doc changes by users, lots of nice stuff that is GUI related.  This
> would open up a whole new toolchain unless there are some hidden
> restrictions and unless I’m misreading something.
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/
> 
> Even given the risk of GH going down I’d take it over forcing the poor
> Infra people to guarantee some SLA for our own git servers. They must have
> a zillion more interesting things to do.
> 
> I’d be happy to shepherd the Infra Jira if people want this. What do
> people think?
> 
> 

Re: Host PIO on Github (not ASF Git)

[Donald Szeto]

It is not clear to me from the gitbox page that we can move our source out
of ASF controlled servers and still be covered by ASF Legal. It's a pretty
big change if true. Did I miss an announcement from ASF?

Personally am happy to have things on GitHub because the flow would be a
lot simpler.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:26 PM Pat Ferrel  wrote:

> BTW there seems now to be a way to host on Github (not ASF Git) by linking
> our ASF accounts to our git accounts. This would make a bunch of things
> much easier like PRs can be reviewed and merged directly,  direct merging
> of doc changes by users, lots of nice stuff that is GUI related.  This
> would open up a whole new toolchain unless there are some hidden
> restrictions and unless I’m misreading something.
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
> Even given the risk of GH going down I’d take it over forcing the poor
> Infra people to guarantee some SLA for our own git servers. They must have
> a zillion more interesting things to do.
>
> I’d be happy to shepherd the Infra Jira if people want this. What do
> people think?
>
>

Host PIO on Github (not ASF Git)

[Pat Ferrel]

BTW there seems now to be a way to host on Github (not ASF Git) by linking our 
ASF accounts to our git accounts. This would make a bunch of things much easier 
like PRs can be reviewed and merged directly,  direct merging of doc changes by 
users, lots of nice stuff that is GUI related.  This would open up a whole new 
toolchain unless there are some hidden restrictions and unless I’m misreading 
something.

https://gitbox.apache.org/ 

Even given the risk of GH going down I’d take it over forcing the poor Infra 
people to guarantee some SLA for our own git servers. They must have a zillion 
more interesting things to do.

I’d be happy to shepherd the Infra Jira if people want this. What do people 
think?