Re: 0.6 status? (was Re: Vote for 0.6 Release)
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:16 +, Marnie McCormack wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > What's the plan ? No plan especially: upload next rc; hope it hasn't got any blocking problems; If vote passes, release; repeat if necessary. A - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
Re: 0.6 status? (was Re: Vote for 0.6 Release)
Hi Andrew, What's the plan ? Marnie On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Marnie McCormack < marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Wondered if theres a revised plan for getting 0.6 release out now ? > > Thanks, > Marnie > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: >> > On 02/11/2010 02:51 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: >> >> >> >> At this point I'm loosing the will to carry out the release manager >> job. >> >> So I'll take suggestions/analysis how to understand/fix the licensing >> >> issue. >> > >> > Did Rajith fix this (I saw several commits from him that seemed to >> address >> > the issue)? >> >> Yes I have fixed the licensing headers and added the updated the RAT >> output to QPID-2404 >> I also updated the Qpid trunk as well. >> >> >> I especially think it's extremely poor that we could have even accepted >> >> this number of files into qpid without licenses - how are we going to >> >> ensure that it doesn't remain an ongoing problem? >> > >> > As Rajith suggested I think we should at a minimum run RAT when/before >> > creating the first RC. That will avoid late disappointments. >> > >> > - >> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation >> > Project: http://qpid.apache.org >> > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Rajith Attapattu >> Red Hat >> http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ >> >> - >> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation >> Project: http://qpid.apache.org >> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org >> >> >
Re: 0.6 status? (was Re: Vote for 0.6 Release)
Hi Andrew, Wondered if theres a revised plan for getting 0.6 release out now ? Thanks, Marnie On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > > On 02/11/2010 02:51 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > >> > >> At this point I'm loosing the will to carry out the release manager job. > >> So I'll take suggestions/analysis how to understand/fix the licensing > >> issue. > > > > Did Rajith fix this (I saw several commits from him that seemed to > address > > the issue)? > > Yes I have fixed the licensing headers and added the updated the RAT > output to QPID-2404 > I also updated the Qpid trunk as well. > > >> I especially think it's extremely poor that we could have even accepted > >> this number of files into qpid without licenses - how are we going to > >> ensure that it doesn't remain an ongoing problem? > > > > As Rajith suggested I think we should at a minimum run RAT when/before > > creating the first RC. That will avoid late disappointments. > > > > - > > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ > > - > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > >
Re: 0.6 status? (was Re: Vote for 0.6 Release)
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 02/11/2010 02:51 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: >> >> At this point I'm loosing the will to carry out the release manager job. >> So I'll take suggestions/analysis how to understand/fix the licensing >> issue. > > Did Rajith fix this (I saw several commits from him that seemed to address > the issue)? Yes I have fixed the licensing headers and added the updated the RAT output to QPID-2404 I also updated the Qpid trunk as well. >> I especially think it's extremely poor that we could have even accepted >> this number of files into qpid without licenses - how are we going to >> ensure that it doesn't remain an ongoing problem? > > As Rajith suggested I think we should at a minimum run RAT when/before > creating the first RC. That will avoid late disappointments. > > - > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ - Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
