Jonathan Robie wrote:
From our sample programs:
C++:
#include qpid/client/Connection.h
#include qpid/client/Session.h
using namespace qpid::client;
using namespace qpid::framing;
Python:
import qpid
import sys
import os
from qpid.util import connect
from qpid.connection import Connection
from qpid.datatypes import Message, RangedSet, uuid4
from qpid.queue import Empty
To me, the C++ is clean and easy to remember. To me, the Python is
cluttered, and I have to look it up each time. In general, if I import a
class, I don't want to have to ask what else do I need to import if I
want to be able to use the class I just imported?
In Python, couldn't the user just import a Connection class and a
Session class, and we could design the API so that they get what they
need to use those classes automagically? Or is there a pythonic reason
to do it this way?
This isn't really an apples to apples comparison. You can do * imports
in python as well, it's just considered better style to actually list
out what you're importing:
from qpid.connection import *
from qpid.datatypes import *
from qpid.util import *
from qpid.queue import *
--Rafael
-
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
