Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
Yesterday, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, > > and make a note to remove it in a year? > > That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? Did you add some reminder somewhere to remember to remove it? (I still think that a syntax error or a failing test file would be best for that.) > Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell > people to change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we > could put it up on github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` > it to look like mzlib/class100. This has been done with planet in the past. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
Agreed. Deprecate now, remove next+ or next++ release -- Matthias On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I think we should give people warnings; we cannot just remove stuff. > > Robby > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: >> On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and >>> make a note to remove it in a year? >> >> That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? >> >> Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell people to >> change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we could put it up on >> github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` it to look like >> mzlib/class100. >> >> Cheers, >> Asumu >> _ >> Racket Developers list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev > > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
I think we should give people warnings; we cannot just remove stuff. Robby On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and >> make a note to remove it in a year? > > That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? > > Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell people to > change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we could put it up on > github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` it to look like > mzlib/class100. > > Cheers, > Asumu > _ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and >> make a note to remove it in a year? > > That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? > > Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell people to > change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we could put it up on > github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` it to look like > mzlib/class100. The latter is a less-invasive change to the code, I would think. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
On 2012-06-21 13:03:18 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and > make a note to remove it in a year? That trick is neat, but would it be a problem to just remove it now? Tony had the idea that we could just put it on PLaneT and tell people to change their `require`s if they really need it. Or we could put it up on github and tell people in the docs to `raco link` it to look like mzlib/class100. Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] [plt] Push #24750: master branch updated
About a month ago, as...@racket-lang.org wrote: > > cfe1711 Asumu Takikawa 2012-05-26 11:10 > : > | Convert all uses of mzlib/class100 to racket/class > : Nice. How about adding a big "deprecated" to the class100 docs, and make a note to remove it in a year? (Eg, add this to the code: (begin-for-syntax (when (> (current-seconds) (date->seconds (date 0 0 0 1 6 2013 0 0 #f 0))) (error "time to remove this code"))) ) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
