Thanks for the example. Here's a small variant:
#lang racket/base
(call-with-values
(lambda () (begin0
(values 1 2 3)
(+ 1 (random 1
list)
The bug wasn't new. It was an old, amazing-that-we-never-hit-it-before
bug.
Fix pushed.
At Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:25:57 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote:
This looks like the sort of thing that I could have broken over the
weekend. I'm not able to construct an example from just this
information, so even a large amount of code may be useful.
At Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:46:29 -0500 (EST), J. Ian Johnson wrote:
Code that used to work is now failing with a pull of the master today. I
can't
reproduce it in small amounts of code, which makes me think it's another
weird
JIT problem.
I have a harness of this kind:
(define (print-values . vs) (for ([v vs]) (display v) (newline)))
(with-limits 3600 4096 (call-with-values (lambda () (begin0 (time
(analysis
program)) (dump-memory-stats))) print-values)
The dump is not reached. Instead, (analysis program) finishes with the
expected
number of values, and once those values pass out of the expression, I get
an
error of the following kind:
exn:fail:contract:arity
It expects 1 value instead of the arbitrary amount it should expect for the
print-values.
I can supply a large amount of code that exercises this behavior, but if
this
is enough to go off, great.
Thanks,
-Ian
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
