River-436 Patch attached to Jira
Folks, I've attached a first patch to River-436. IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and creating several new possibilities. I am more than eager to discuss it and compare to alternatives. Note that the code is not really production-grade (yet). I've attached it for review. -- Michał Kłeczek XPro Sp. z o. o. ul. Borowskiego 2 03-475 Warszawa Polska
Re: River-436 Patch attached to Jira
I'll get a branch build up and running on Hudson for this soon. Regards, Peter. - Original message - > Folks, > > I've attached a first patch to River-436. > IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and > creating several new possibilities. > > I am more than eager to discuss it and compare to alternatives. > > Note that the code is not really production-grade (yet). I've attached > it for review. > > -- > Michał Kłeczek > XPro Sp. z o. o. > ul. Borowskiego 2 > 03-475 Warszawa > Polska
Re: River-436 Patch attached to Jira
Thanks Peter, There is no need to rush with it yet. I need to run it locally first :-) But it would be good to have branch for it so that it is easier to resolve conflicts. Regards, On Tuesday 18 of March 2014 22:31:08 Peter wrote: > I'll get a branch build up and running on Hudson for this soon. > > Regards, > > Peter. > > > - Original message - > > > Folks, > > > > I've attached a first patch to River-436. > > IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and > > creating several new possibilities. > > > > I am more than eager to discuss it and compare to alternatives. > > > > Note that the code is not really production-grade (yet). I've attached > > it for review. -- Michał Kłeczek XPro Sp. z o. o. ul. Borowskiego 2 03-475 Warszawa Polska
Re: River-436 Patch attached to Jira
Michał, Just though I'd mention that objects implementing Distributed don't need to implement Serializable. Cheers, Peter. On 18/03/2014 11:18 PM, Michał Kłeczek wrote: Thanks Peter, There is no need to rush with it yet. I need to run it locally first :-) But it would be good to have branch for it so that it is easier to resolve conflicts. Regards, On Tuesday 18 of March 2014 22:31:08 Peter wrote: I'll get a branch build up and running on Hudson for this soon. Regards, Peter. - Original message - Folks, I've attached a first patch to River-436. IMHO the idea is really sound - fixing several issues with River and creating several new possibilities. I am more than eager to discuss it and compare to alternatives. Note that the code is not really production-grade (yet). I've attached it for review. -- Michał Kłeczek XPro Sp. z o. o. ul. Borowskiego 2 03-475 Warszawa Polska
