[RESULT][VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-19 Thread heng du
Hello RocketMQ Community,

This is the vote result for the kickoff of RIP-40 Quickly deploy of Apache
Rocketmq Cluster
and it has
been passed with [3] binding +1s, [2] non-binding:

*Binding votes +1s:*

Heng Du (duhengfore...@apache.org )
ShannonDing(shannond...@apache.org )
Rongtong Jin(jinrongton...@mails.ucas.ac.cn)

*Non-binding votes +1s:*

caigy (csgyt...@163.com)
zhiboli(osgooli...@gmail.com)



This RIP will be accepted and its status will be updated to RocketMQ wiki
soon.


Thanks.

孙先生  于2022年4月18日周一 17:11写道:

>
>
>
> Thank you,
> I've actually finished the development.
>
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-externals/pull/879
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2022-04-18 10:31:45, "yukon"  wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >There are some playbooks to deploy rocketmq that could be your reference:
> >https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-rocketmq
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM ShannonDing  wrote:
> >
> >> +1,
> >>
> >> At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
> >> >Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
> >> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
> >> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email
> thread
> >> to enter the voting process.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> >> of votes are reached.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Please vote accordingly:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >[ ] +1 approve
> >> >
> >> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >> >
> >> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>
>


Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-18 Thread 孙先生



Thank you, 
I've actually finished the development.



https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-externals/pull/879











At 2022-04-18 10:31:45, "yukon"  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There are some playbooks to deploy rocketmq that could be your reference:
>https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-rocketmq
>
>
>
>On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM ShannonDing  wrote:
>
>> +1,
>>
>> At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
>> >Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
>> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
>> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
>> to enter the voting process.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
>> of votes are reached.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Please vote accordingly:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >[ ] +1 approve
>> >
>> >[ ] +0 no opinion
>> >
>> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>


Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-17 Thread yukon
Hi,

There are some playbooks to deploy rocketmq that could be your reference:
https://github.com/openmessaging/benchmark/tree/master/driver-rocketmq



On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM ShannonDing  wrote:

> +1,
>
> At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
> >Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>


Re:[VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-17 Thread ShannonDing
+1,

At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
>Hi, RocketMQ Community, 
>
>
>
>
>As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly deploy 
>Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are willing to 
>support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread to enter the 
>voting process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of 
>votes are reached.
>
>
>
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-17 Thread 孙先生
Thank you for attention,




The Playbook was one of the most critical resources in terraform's entire 
programming process. 

In addition, The Playbook as a whole can be reused by any company that uses 
Ansible as an automated operation tool, which is currently the most widely used 
automated operation tool.




Use the Playbook to quickly build a very large Apache Rockertmq cluster or 
quickly scale up an existing rocketMQ running online with no impact on 
production.




Another way to create an Apache RocketMQ cluster is to use the K8S operator, 
which I think together complements the Apache RocketMQ ecosystem.




In my practice, terraform was used to describe the creation of an Apache 
RocketMQ cluster with hundreds of machines, and the entire cluster was built in 
minutes.











At 2022-04-16 22:21:38, "Xiaorui Wang"  wrote:
>For this RIP, whether it has K8S and the support plans of Cloud providers.
>
>For example, which Clouds Terraform can support, whether IAM is connected
>and
>the Scale up down is supported.
>
>Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
>[1] https://github.com/vintagewang
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:23 AM 孙先生  wrote:
>
>> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
>> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
>> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
>> to enter the voting process.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
>> votes are reached.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-16 Thread Xiaorui Wang
For this RIP, whether it has K8S and the support plans of Cloud providers.

For example, which Clouds Terraform can support, whether IAM is connected
and
the Scale up down is supported.

Xiaorui Wang[1] - Apache RocketMQ PMC chair
[1] https://github.com/vintagewang


On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:23 AM 孙先生  wrote:

> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>
>
> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-16 Thread zhibo li
+1

jinrongtong  于2022年4月16日周六 17:56写道:

> +1
> At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
> >Hi, RocketMQ Community,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
> of votes are reached.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Please vote accordingly:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>


Re:[VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-16 Thread jinrongtong
+1
At 2022-04-15 10:23:25, "孙先生"  wrote:
>Hi, RocketMQ Community, 
>
>
>
>
>As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly deploy 
>Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are willing to 
>support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread to enter the 
>voting process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of 
>votes are reached.
>
>
>
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re:Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-16 Thread caigy

+1






在 2022-04-15 10:26:45,"heng du"  写道:
>+1
>
>孙先生  于2022年4月15日周五 10:23写道:
>
>> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
>> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
>> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
>> to enter the voting process.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
>> votes are reached.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re: [VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-14 Thread heng du
+1

孙先生  于2022年4月15日周五 10:23写道:

> Hi, RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>
>
> As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly
> deploy Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are
> willing to support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread
> to enter the voting process.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
>
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


[VOTE][RIP-40] Quickly deploy of Apache Rocketmq Cluster

2022-04-14 Thread 孙先生
Hi, RocketMQ Community, 




As discussed in the previous email, we launched a new RIP to Quickly deploy 
Apache Rocketmq Cluster. Now the shepherds @duhengforever are willing to 
support the RIP, so I think it is time to start an email thread to enter the 
voting process.







The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of 
votes are reached.




Please vote accordingly:




[ ] +1 approve

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason