Re: next roller release

2021-12-14 Thread Dave
Yes, I agree. I will put together a release candidate today.

Dave

On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 5:15 PM Michael Bien  wrote:

> agreed. I think going right to 6.1 would be the preferable path since I
> think enough happened that it warrants a larger increment while the changes
> itself are small enough to not cause trouble during upgrade.
>
> I would try to avoid branching into two releases if somehow possible
> unless it is motivated by breaking changes or difficult upgrades. Having to
> pick what to backport is extra work and not always easy.
>
> michael
>
>
> On 11.12.21 22:54, Dave wrote:
>
> Yes, indeed! Thanks for pushing on this Michael. I was thinking that we
> should do both a 6.0.x release and something called 6.1 (from master), but
> now I'm thinking we should just do one 6.1 release and encourage folks to
> upgrade to that. Thoughts?
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM Michael Bien  wrote:
>
>> all PRs are integrated, would be good timing for 6.1 :)
>>
>> -michael
>>
>>
>> On 18.09.21 03:19, Dave wrote:
>> > I think that's a great idea. There have been a lot of changes since our
>> > last release from master.
>> >
>> > I'd be happy to manage a release, or help somebody else to do it if
>> they'd
>> > like to go through and learn the process.
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michael Bien  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello Everyone,
>> >>
>> >> now that JDK 17 is out I was wondering if apache roller should get an
>> >> update release too. The master branch was compatible with Java 17 for a
>> >> while already. My blog container is also using early access builds of
>> >> Java 17 for months without problems.
>> >>
>> >> maybe in next month or two, doesn't have to be soon.
>> >>
>> >> what do you think?
>> >>
>> >> best regards,
>> >>
>> >> michael
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>


Re: next roller release

2021-12-11 Thread Michael Bien
agreed. I think going right to 6.1 would be the preferable path since I 
think enough happened that it warrants a larger increment while the 
changes itself are small enough to not cause trouble during upgrade.


I would try to avoid branching into two releases if somehow possible 
unless it is motivated by breaking changes or difficult upgrades. Having 
to pick what to backport is extra work and not always easy.


michael


On 11.12.21 22:54, Dave wrote:
Yes, indeed! Thanks for pushing on this Michael. I was thinking that 
we should do both a 6.0.x release and something called 6.1 (from 
master), but now I'm thinking we should just do one 6.1 release and 
encourage folks to upgrade to that. Thoughts?


Dave


On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM Michael Bien  wrote:

all PRs are integrated, would be good timing for 6.1 :)

-michael


On 18.09.21 03:19, Dave wrote:
> I think that's a great idea. There have been a lot of changes
since our
> last release from master.
>
> I'd be happy to manage a release, or help somebody else to do it
if they'd
> like to go through and learn the process.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michael Bien 
wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> now that JDK 17 is out I was wondering if apache roller should
get an
>> update release too. The master branch was compatible with Java
17 for a
>> while already. My blog container is also using early access
builds of
>> Java 17 for months without problems.
>>
>> maybe in next month or two, doesn't have to be soon.
>>
>> what do you think?
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> michael
>>
>>



Re: next roller release

2021-12-11 Thread Dave
Yes, indeed! Thanks for pushing on this Michael. I was thinking that we
should do both a 6.0.x release and something called 6.1 (from master), but
now I'm thinking we should just do one 6.1 release and encourage folks to
upgrade to that. Thoughts?

Dave


On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM Michael Bien  wrote:

> all PRs are integrated, would be good timing for 6.1 :)
>
> -michael
>
>
> On 18.09.21 03:19, Dave wrote:
> > I think that's a great idea. There have been a lot of changes since our
> > last release from master.
> >
> > I'd be happy to manage a release, or help somebody else to do it if
> they'd
> > like to go through and learn the process.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michael Bien  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Everyone,
> >>
> >> now that JDK 17 is out I was wondering if apache roller should get an
> >> update release too. The master branch was compatible with Java 17 for a
> >> while already. My blog container is also using early access builds of
> >> Java 17 for months without problems.
> >>
> >> maybe in next month or two, doesn't have to be soon.
> >>
> >> what do you think?
> >>
> >> best regards,
> >>
> >> michael
> >>
> >>
>
>


Re: next roller release

2021-12-11 Thread Michael Bien

all PRs are integrated, would be good timing for 6.1 :)

-michael


On 18.09.21 03:19, Dave wrote:

I think that's a great idea. There have been a lot of changes since our
last release from master.

I'd be happy to manage a release, or help somebody else to do it if they'd
like to go through and learn the process.

Dave


On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michael Bien  wrote:


Hello Everyone,

now that JDK 17 is out I was wondering if apache roller should get an
update release too. The master branch was compatible with Java 17 for a
while already. My blog container is also using early access builds of
Java 17 for months without problems.

maybe in next month or two, doesn't have to be soon.

what do you think?

best regards,

michael






Re: next roller release

2021-09-17 Thread Dave
I think that's a great idea. There have been a lot of changes since our
last release from master.

I'd be happy to manage a release, or help somebody else to do it if they'd
like to go through and learn the process.

Dave


On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michael Bien  wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> now that JDK 17 is out I was wondering if apache roller should get an
> update release too. The master branch was compatible with Java 17 for a
> while already. My blog container is also using early access builds of
> Java 17 for months without problems.
>
> maybe in next month or two, doesn't have to be soon.
>
> what do you think?
>
> best regards,
>
> michael
>
>