Re: Routing revisted

[Andrew Wetmore]

@Harbs  could you let me know when you have updated
that page? I will do a doofus check for grammar and suchlike. Very grateful
for this help, as I would not be sure what to say about this feature.

Once that is in place, I will try to populate the related page in the
tutorial.

a

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 5:16 AM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi Harbs,
>
> I think Deprecated could be used in both parts since you can deprecate the
> entire class or just some methods or properties. In this case maybe just
> using at class level should be enough. Apart from that, since we're still
> not in 1.0, I think we could remove it directly if you want, since it is
> better to reach 1.0 as clean as possible. That means few people using it
> should get an error and looking a bit will make them find what happens if
> they are not following us. Then after 1.0 I think we should be very
> careful with it. Just my opinion.
>
> About docs, could you update it? I'll be using it to implement in a new
> application.
>
> I updated the TodoMVC example to use HashRouter, but will want to update to
> BrowserRouter when I know how to use it.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> El dom., 19 jul. 2020 a las 21:29, Harbs ()
> escribió:
>
> > I added [Deprecated] meta tags for Router. I’m not sure if that goes on
> > the class or the constructor. I added it to both...
> >
> > > On Jul 19, 2020, at 9:08 PM, Harbs  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Jul 19, 2020, at 9:00 PM, Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm looking to add routing to a royale app embedded in a web page.
> > >> I remember Harbs added HashRouter and BrowserRouter.
> > >>
> > >> 1.- Router is finally deprecated? If so, I think it should be removed
> to
> > >> avoid confusions.
> > >
> > > Yes. It’s deprecated. We can probably remove it. I doubt it’s being
> used.
> > >
> > >> 2.- Could this page [1] be updated to reflect the new classes?
> > > Yes. It should.
> > >
> > >> 3.- For apps embedded in a web page, it's possible to use
> > BrowserRouter? or
> > >> is it mandatory to use HashRouter?
> > >
> > > Either will work.
> > >
> > >> I think this example [2] (TodoMVC-Crux) that is using Router, could be
> > >> updated to BrowserRouter, but I guess that will only work if I change
> > >> .htaccess rewrite rules like Josh said right?
> > >
> > > Correct.
> > >
> > >> The config will be the same just changing "Router" to
> "BrowserRouter"? :
> > >>
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/routing
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/examples/crux/todomvc-jewel-crux/src/main/royale/jewel/todomvc
> > >> --
> > >> Carlos Rovira
> > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Jewel dynamic DataGrid columns

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Guys,

I have requirements to have DataGrid where I'm adding/removing columns
dynamically. I'm basically going trough the code and trying to figure out
how everything works and how to approach that problem.

I see that Jewel DataGrid is using class called DataGridButtonBar - It
seems to me that I should just manipulate that one - basically adding:

header.dataProvider = myNewColumns.

However it does not gives me required result, even more my existing columns
are displaying "undefined" in header text.

My general question how would you approach this ?

Thanks,
-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: Routing revisted

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Harbs,

I think Deprecated could be used in both parts since you can deprecate the
entire class or just some methods or properties. In this case maybe just
using at class level should be enough. Apart from that, since we're still
not in 1.0, I think we could remove it directly if you want, since it is
better to reach 1.0 as clean as possible. That means few people using it
should get an error and looking a bit will make them find what happens if
they are not following us. Then after 1.0 I think we should be very
careful with it. Just my opinion.

About docs, could you update it? I'll be using it to implement in a new
application.

I updated the TodoMVC example to use HashRouter, but will want to update to
BrowserRouter when I know how to use it.

Thanks



El dom., 19 jul. 2020 a las 21:29, Harbs () escribió:

> I added [Deprecated] meta tags for Router. I’m not sure if that goes on
> the class or the constructor. I added it to both...
>
> > On Jul 19, 2020, at 9:08 PM, Harbs  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Jul 19, 2020, at 9:00 PM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm looking to add routing to a royale app embedded in a web page.
> >> I remember Harbs added HashRouter and BrowserRouter.
> >>
> >> 1.- Router is finally deprecated? If so, I think it should be removed to
> >> avoid confusions.
> >
> > Yes. It’s deprecated. We can probably remove it. I doubt it’s being used.
> >
> >> 2.- Could this page [1] be updated to reflect the new classes?
> > Yes. It should.
> >
> >> 3.- For apps embedded in a web page, it's possible to use
> BrowserRouter? or
> >> is it mandatory to use HashRouter?
> >
> > Either will work.
> >
> >> I think this example [2] (TodoMVC-Crux) that is using Router, could be
> >> updated to BrowserRouter, but I guess that will only work if I change
> >> .htaccess rewrite rules like Josh said right?
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> The config will be the same just changing "Router" to "BrowserRouter"? :
> >>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> [1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/features/routing
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/examples/crux/todomvc-jewel-crux/src/main/royale/jewel/todomvc
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira