Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Yishay Weiss]

Ok, I did that. I will announce the release once @Andrew 
Wetmore approves the draft.

From: Josh Tynjala 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 5:21 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

I think you just replace the contents of the tourdejewel directory with a
new build:

https://github.com/apache/royale-website/tree/master/tourdejewel

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:40 AM Yishay Weiss  wrote:

> I added a blog post to the docs repo, does it get published automatically?
>
> What needs to be done in TDJ?
> 
> From: Josh Tynjala 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 7:02 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
>
> I just updated the source code and downloads pages on the website to link
> to 0.9.10.
>
> In addition to Tour de Jewel, we'll need a 9.10.0 blog post. As with
> previous releases, it can simply be based on the changelogs.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC 
>
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:54 PM Piotr Zarzycki  >
> wrote:
>
> > I agree on a point where we need more people who can easily do a release.
> > Let’s have 2 more releases with someone else than you and discuss 1.0
> than.
> >
> > In case of announcing I think it should happen once all release related
> > stuff is fully done. We need to update website and Tour de Jewel build
> > maybe. Do you know how to do that ?
> >
> > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:31, Yishay Weiss 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I think it's a good idea to bump the next version, maybe to 0.9.12.
> Going
> > > to 1.0 now does not seem like a good idea to me, because it would
> involve
> > > some overhead and my aim now is to get somebody else in the team
> involved
> > > in the next release and I want to keep it simple for him or her.
> > >
> > > I just posted the standard draft announcement, if anybody has
> suggestions
> > > on how to handle the npm version confusion there, please respond to
> that
> > > thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > From: Piotr Zarzycki 
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 2:20 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > > Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala 
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> > >
> > > My suggestion is next release 1.0.0 finally and forgot about that minor
> > > stuff.
> > >
> > > The other thing let’s have clear explanation in announcement.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 11:52, Yishay Weiss 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > OTOH the release number is incorrect. I published it to 0.9.11
> > > > accidentally. I'm afraid I cannot change that to 0.9.10 because I
> > > > accidentally published to 0.9.10 a year ago. The good news is that I
> > have
> > > > fixed the npm release script so this issue should not happen again.
> The
> > > bad
> > > > news is that when we release 0.9.11 we won't be able to overwrite the
> > > > current 0.9.11 version.
> > > >
> > > > Unpublishing 0.9.10 and 0.9.11 is not an option so long as @OmPrakash
> > > > Muppirala is listed as a maintainer and
> > > does
> > > > not explicitly approve.
> > > >
> > > > Not sure what to do here, so any suggestions are welcome.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: Josh Tynjala 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 8:31 PM
> > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> > > >
> > > > In reference to the npm issue with the 0.9.9 release [1], I just
> wanted
> > > to
> > > > mention that I've confirmed that the published npm packages are
> > > > working correctly for this release. Yay!
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zclk7q1lowsv464797xl5wmxr2skj2ww
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Josh Tynjala
> > > > Bowler Hat LLC 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Yishay Weiss <
> yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
>

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released

[Yishay Weiss]

I'm not sure, but I did notice this sentence there which should be revised.

"Our goal is to have documentation for all significant Royale features in place 
early in 2020."

From: Andrew Wetmore 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 3:29 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released

Should the documentation link go to the docs page on the website [1],
instead of to a GitHub repo?

[1] https://royale.apache.org/docs/

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yishay Weiss  wrote:

> Here's another version with mirrors replaced and a footnote on npm version
> confision. Thoughts?
>
> -
>
> The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Royale 0.9.10.
>
> The Apache Royale project is the next generation of the Apache Flex SDK. It
> lets developers use MXML and ActionScript 3 to generate HTML/JS/CSS
> applications which can run natively in browsers. The cross-compiled code
> can also run on platforms like Electron or Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap)
> to build mobile applications.
>
> This release should be considered ‘beta’ quality, although we’re very close
> to a 1.0 release and we have many applications in production at this point.
> The purpose of this release is to continue to gather feedback about
> Royale’s features and the project’s implementation strategies, and to
> recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code base into an SDK and
> tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when developing
> applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases, however, may
> not handle all production needs.
>
> Changes in 0.9.10:
>
> Apache Royale Framework 0.9.10:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md
> Apache Royale Compiler 0.9.10:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md
>
> Please file bugs at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
>
> If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
>
> For questions about how to use Royale, send email to [hidden email].
> For questions and feedback on the development of the source code in the
> release, send email to [hidden email].
>
> Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
> ASF Content Distribution Network (CDN):
>
> Source:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.tar.gz
>
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.zip
>
> Binary:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.zip
>
> Binary with SWF support:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.zip
>
> When downloading from a CDN site, please remember to verify the
> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>
> The binary packages can also be installed via NPM [1].
>
> Mac:
> sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>
> Or for SWF Support:
> sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>
> Windows:
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>
> Or for SWF Support:
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>
> See the README for more information. The language reference (ASDoc) is
> here: https://royale.apache.org/asdoc/
>
> Additional documentation is here: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>
> The documentation is still a work in progress. Volunteers are welcome to
> help improve it. Visit https://royale.apache.org/ for links to other
> resources.
>
> Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of application
> development.
>
> The Apache Royale Community
>
> [1] Please note that version number on the NPM registry is 0.9.11, but it
> refers to Apache Royale 0.9.10. We
> will try to fix that for the next release.
>
>
> 
> From: Andrew Wetmore 
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:57 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released
>
> No, the links seem to be valid.
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 9:52 AM Yishay Weiss 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andrew. Do the links need to reflect the transition from mirrors
> > somehow?
> > 
> > From: Andrew Wetmore 
> > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:44 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released
> >
> > I think this is very clear and hopeful.
> >
> > Two notes: The ASF has retired its mirror system, and is moving away from
> > prominent use of "Apache", usually in favour of "The ASF". This is in
> > response to concerns about appropriation of images (feather) and mythos
> > (noble Indians) without consultation or agreement 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Josh Tynjala]

I think you just replace the contents of the tourdejewel directory with a
new build:

https://github.com/apache/royale-website/tree/master/tourdejewel

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:40 AM Yishay Weiss  wrote:

> I added a blog post to the docs repo, does it get published automatically?
>
> What needs to be done in TDJ?
> 
> From: Josh Tynjala 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 7:02 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
>
> I just updated the source code and downloads pages on the website to link
> to 0.9.10.
>
> In addition to Tour de Jewel, we'll need a 9.10.0 blog post. As with
> previous releases, it can simply be based on the changelogs.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC 
>
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:54 PM Piotr Zarzycki  >
> wrote:
>
> > I agree on a point where we need more people who can easily do a release.
> > Let’s have 2 more releases with someone else than you and discuss 1.0
> than.
> >
> > In case of announcing I think it should happen once all release related
> > stuff is fully done. We need to update website and Tour de Jewel build
> > maybe. Do you know how to do that ?
> >
> > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:31, Yishay Weiss 
> wrote:
> >
> > > I think it's a good idea to bump the next version, maybe to 0.9.12.
> Going
> > > to 1.0 now does not seem like a good idea to me, because it would
> involve
> > > some overhead and my aim now is to get somebody else in the team
> involved
> > > in the next release and I want to keep it simple for him or her.
> > >
> > > I just posted the standard draft announcement, if anybody has
> suggestions
> > > on how to handle the npm version confusion there, please respond to
> that
> > > thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > From: Piotr Zarzycki 
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 2:20 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > > Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala 
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> > >
> > > My suggestion is next release 1.0.0 finally and forgot about that minor
> > > stuff.
> > >
> > > The other thing let’s have clear explanation in announcement.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 11:52, Yishay Weiss 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > OTOH the release number is incorrect. I published it to 0.9.11
> > > > accidentally. I'm afraid I cannot change that to 0.9.10 because I
> > > > accidentally published to 0.9.10 a year ago. The good news is that I
> > have
> > > > fixed the npm release script so this issue should not happen again.
> The
> > > bad
> > > > news is that when we release 0.9.11 we won't be able to overwrite the
> > > > current 0.9.11 version.
> > > >
> > > > Unpublishing 0.9.10 and 0.9.11 is not an option so long as @OmPrakash
> > > > Muppirala is listed as a maintainer and
> > > does
> > > > not explicitly approve.
> > > >
> > > > Not sure what to do here, so any suggestions are welcome.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > From: Josh Tynjala 
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 8:31 PM
> > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> > > >
> > > > In reference to the npm issue with the 0.9.9 release [1], I just
> wanted
> > > to
> > > > mention that I've confirmed that the published npm packages are
> > > > working correctly for this release. Yay!
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zclk7q1lowsv464797xl5wmxr2skj2ww
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Josh Tynjala
> > > > Bowler Hat LLC 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Yishay Weiss <
> yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
>

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released

[Andrew Wetmore]

Should the documentation link go to the docs page on the website [1],
instead of to a GitHub repo?

[1] https://royale.apache.org/docs/

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yishay Weiss  wrote:

> Here's another version with mirrors replaced and a footnote on npm version
> confision. Thoughts?
>
> -
>
> The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
> Royale 0.9.10.
>
> The Apache Royale project is the next generation of the Apache Flex SDK. It
> lets developers use MXML and ActionScript 3 to generate HTML/JS/CSS
> applications which can run natively in browsers. The cross-compiled code
> can also run on platforms like Electron or Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap)
> to build mobile applications.
>
> This release should be considered ‘beta’ quality, although we’re very close
> to a 1.0 release and we have many applications in production at this point.
> The purpose of this release is to continue to gather feedback about
> Royale’s features and the project’s implementation strategies, and to
> recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code base into an SDK and
> tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when developing
> applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases, however, may
> not handle all production needs.
>
> Changes in 0.9.10:
>
> Apache Royale Framework 0.9.10:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md
> Apache Royale Compiler 0.9.10:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md
>
> Please file bugs at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues
>
> If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues
>
> For questions about how to use Royale, send email to [hidden email].
> For questions and feedback on the development of the source code in the
> release, send email to [hidden email].
>
> Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
> ASF Content Distribution Network (CDN):
>
> Source:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.tar.gz
>
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.zip
>
> Binary:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.zip
>
> Binary with SWF support:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
>
> https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.zip
>
> When downloading from a CDN site, please remember to verify the
> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>
> The binary packages can also be installed via NPM [1].
>
> Mac:
> sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>
> Or for SWF Support:
> sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>
> Windows:
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g
>
> Or for SWF Support:
> npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g
>
> See the README for more information. The language reference (ASDoc) is
> here: https://royale.apache.org/asdoc/
>
> Additional documentation is here: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/
>
> The documentation is still a work in progress. Volunteers are welcome to
> help improve it. Visit https://royale.apache.org/ for links to other
> resources.
>
> Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of application
> development.
>
> The Apache Royale Community
>
> [1] Please note that version number on the NPM registry is 0.9.11, but it
> refers to Apache Royale 0.9.10. We
> will try to fix that for the next release.
>
>
> 
> From: Andrew Wetmore 
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:57 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released
>
> No, the links seem to be valid.
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 9:52 AM Yishay Weiss 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Andrew. Do the links need to reflect the transition from mirrors
> > somehow?
> > 
> > From: Andrew Wetmore 
> > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:44 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released
> >
> > I think this is very clear and hopeful.
> >
> > Two notes: The ASF has retired its mirror system, and is moving away from
> > prominent use of "Apache", usually in favour of "The ASF". This is in
> > response to concerns about appropriation of images (feather) and mythos
> > (noble Indians) without consultation or agreement with the indigenous
> > people involved. A committee of the ASF Board is working on what of the
> > Foundation's branding can and should change, and how to do it with
> > the least disruption, so we will need to keep an eye out for their
> eventual
> > decision.
> >
> > In the meantime, two sentences should change:
> >
> > 1. Apache Royale is available 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

[Yishay Weiss]

I added a blog post to the docs repo, does it get published automatically?

What needs to be done in TDJ?

From: Josh Tynjala 
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 7:02 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4

I just updated the source code and downloads pages on the website to link
to 0.9.10.

In addition to Tour de Jewel, we'll need a 9.10.0 blog post. As with
previous releases, it can simply be based on the changelogs.

--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:54 PM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> I agree on a point where we need more people who can easily do a release.
> Let’s have 2 more releases with someone else than you and discuss 1.0 than.
>
> In case of announcing I think it should happen once all release related
> stuff is fully done. We need to update website and Tour de Jewel build
> maybe. Do you know how to do that ?
>
> On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:31, Yishay Weiss  wrote:
>
> > I think it's a good idea to bump the next version, maybe to 0.9.12. Going
> > to 1.0 now does not seem like a good idea to me, because it would involve
> > some overhead and my aim now is to get somebody else in the team involved
> > in the next release and I want to keep it simple for him or her.
> >
> > I just posted the standard draft announcement, if anybody has suggestions
> > on how to handle the npm version confusion there, please respond to that
> > thread.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > From: Piotr Zarzycki 
> > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 2:20 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > Cc: OmPrakash Muppirala 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> >
> > My suggestion is next release 1.0.0 finally and forgot about that minor
> > stuff.
> >
> > The other thing let’s have clear explanation in announcement.
> >
> > On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 11:52, Yishay Weiss 
> wrote:
> >
> > > OTOH the release number is incorrect. I published it to 0.9.11
> > > accidentally. I'm afraid I cannot change that to 0.9.10 because I
> > > accidentally published to 0.9.10 a year ago. The good news is that I
> have
> > > fixed the npm release script so this issue should not happen again. The
> > bad
> > > news is that when we release 0.9.11 we won't be able to overwrite the
> > > current 0.9.11 version.
> > >
> > > Unpublishing 0.9.10 and 0.9.11 is not an option so long as @OmPrakash
> > > Muppirala is listed as a maintainer and
> > does
> > > not explicitly approve.
> > >
> > > Not sure what to do here, so any suggestions are welcome.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > From: Josh Tynjala 
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 8:31 PM
> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC4
> > >
> > > In reference to the npm issue with the 0.9.9 release [1], I just wanted
> > to
> > > mention that I've confirmed that the published npm packages are
> > > working correctly for this release. Yay!
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zclk7q1lowsv464797xl5wmxr2skj2ww
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC 
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Yishay Weiss 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released

[Yishay Weiss]

Here's another version with mirrors replaced and a footnote on npm version 
confision. Thoughts?

-

The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Royale 0.9.10.

The Apache Royale project is the next generation of the Apache Flex SDK. It
lets developers use MXML and ActionScript 3 to generate HTML/JS/CSS
applications which can run natively in browsers. The cross-compiled code
can also run on platforms like Electron or Apache Cordova (Adobe PhoneGap)
to build mobile applications.

This release should be considered ‘beta’ quality, although we’re very close
to a 1.0 release and we have many applications in production at this point.
The purpose of this release is to continue to gather feedback about
Royale’s features and the project’s implementation strategies, and to
recruit new contributors. We hope to grow the code base into an SDK and
tool chain that delivers the highest productivity when developing
applications that can run on many platforms. Beta releases, however, may
not handle all production needs.

Changes in 0.9.10:

Apache Royale Framework 0.9.10:
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md
Apache Royale Compiler 0.9.10:
https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/blob/apache-royale-0.9.10/RELEASE_NOTES.md

Please file bugs at:

https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues

If you happen to know it is a compiler issue, please use:

https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/issues

For questions about how to use Royale, send email to [hidden email].
For questions and feedback on the development of the source code in the
release, send email to [hidden email].

Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the
ASF Content Distribution Network (CDN):

Source:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.tar.gz

https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/apache-royale-0.9.10-src.zip

Binary:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.tar.gz
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js.zip

Binary with SWF support:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.tar.gz
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/royale/0.9.10/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.10-bin-js-swf.zip

When downloading from a CDN site, please remember to verify the
downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.

The binary packages can also be installed via NPM [1].

Mac:
sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g

Or for SWF Support:
sudo npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g

Windows:
npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g

Or for SWF Support:
npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf -g

See the README for more information. The language reference (ASDoc) is
here: https://royale.apache.org/asdoc/

Additional documentation is here: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/

The documentation is still a work in progress. Volunteers are welcome to
help improve it. Visit https://royale.apache.org/ for links to other
resources.

Please try Royale and become involved in shaping the future of application
development.

The Apache Royale Community

[1] Please note that version number on the NPM registry is 0.9.11, but it 
refers to Apache Royale 0.9.10. We
will try to fix that for the next release.



From: Andrew Wetmore 
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:57 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released

No, the links seem to be valid.

On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 9:52 AM Yishay Weiss  wrote:

> Thanks, Andrew. Do the links need to reflect the transition from mirrors
> somehow?
> 
> From: Andrew Wetmore 
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2023 3:44 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.10 released
>
> I think this is very clear and hopeful.
>
> Two notes: The ASF has retired its mirror system, and is moving away from
> prominent use of "Apache", usually in favour of "The ASF". This is in
> response to concerns about appropriation of images (feather) and mythos
> (noble Indians) without consultation or agreement with the indigenous
> people involved. A committee of the ASF Board is working on what of the
> Foundation's branding can and should change, and how to do it with
> the least disruption, so we will need to keep an eye out for their eventual
> decision.
>
> In the meantime, two sentences should change:
>
> 1. Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the Apache
> mirrors:
> should be
> Apache Royale is available in source and binary form from the ASF Content
> Distribution Network (CDN):
>
> 2. When downloading from a mirror site, please remember to verify the
> downloads using signatures or MD5 hashes.
> should be
> When downloading from the CDN, please remember to verify the downloads
> using signatures or MD5 hashes.
>
> a
>
> On Sun,