Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-03 Thread Carlos Rovira 
Ok Harbs,
thanks

El mar., 2 jun. 2020 a las 21:50, Harbs () escribió:

> I removed the mentions in the NOTICE file. That’s all we needed to do.
>
> > On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:47 PM, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > so I understand I don't have to make any change, let me know if I'm wrong
> > thanks
> >
> > El mar., 2 jun. 2020 a las 19:30, Harbs ()
> escribió:
> >
> >> OK. Missed that too.
> >>
> >> Either way, looks like we’re fine. :-)
> >>
> >>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Open Sans is bundled in TourDeFlex
> >>>
> >>
> examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/src/mx/effects/assets/OpenSans-Regular.ttf
> >>>
> >>> And is mentioned in LICENSE:
> >>>
> >>> " The examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules includes a number of
> >> subcomponents with
> >>> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
> >>> code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and
> >>> conditions of the following licenses.
> >>>
> >>> The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details
> >>> see src/mx/effects/assets."
> >>>
> >>> HTH,
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 6/2/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked
> >> and it’s just referenced in template html.
> >>>
> >>>   So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.
> >>>
>  On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?
> >> If we only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or
> >> NOTICE
> 
>  Thanks,
>  -Alex
> 
>  On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>   Please look at:
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
> >> <
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> 
>   AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
>   AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
> 
>   Where should the mention go?
> 
> 
>   [1]
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
> >> <
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
>   [2]
> >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=222MrhuSmsWT%2FvvOoZwNtxBMMaPoyEj0Jqr6veeWZW4%3D&reserved=0
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Harbs 
I removed the mentions in the NOTICE file. That’s all we needed to do.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:47 PM, Carlos Rovira  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> so I understand I don't have to make any change, let me know if I'm wrong
> thanks
> 
> El mar., 2 jun. 2020 a las 19:30, Harbs () escribió:
> 
>> OK. Missed that too.
>> 
>> Either way, looks like we’re fine. :-)
>> 
>>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Open Sans is bundled in TourDeFlex
>>> 
>> examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/src/mx/effects/assets/OpenSans-Regular.ttf
>>> 
>>> And is mentioned in LICENSE:
>>> 
>>> " The examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules includes a number of
>> subcomponents with
>>> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
>>> code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and
>>> conditions of the following licenses.
>>> 
>>> The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details
>>> see src/mx/effects/assets."
>>> 
>>> HTH,
>>> -Alex
>>> 
>>> On 6/2/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>>> 
>>>   You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked
>> and it’s just referenced in template html.
>>> 
>>>   So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.
>>> 
 On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui 
>> wrote:
 
 What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?
>> If we only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or
>> NOTICE
 
 Thanks,
 -Alex
 
 On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
 
  Please look at:
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
>> <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
 
  AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
  AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
 
  Where should the mention go?
 
 
  [1]
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
>> <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
  [2]
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=222MrhuSmsWT%2FvvOoZwNtxBMMaPoyEj0Jqr6veeWZW4%3D&reserved=0
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Carlos Rovira 
Hi,

so I understand I don't have to make any change, let me know if I'm wrong
thanks

El mar., 2 jun. 2020 a las 19:30, Harbs () escribió:

> OK. Missed that too.
>
> Either way, looks like we’re fine. :-)
>
> > On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> >
> > Open Sans is bundled in TourDeFlex
> >
> examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/src/mx/effects/assets/OpenSans-Regular.ttf
> >
> > And is mentioned in LICENSE:
> >
> > " The examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules includes a number of
> subcomponents with
> > separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
> > code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and
> > conditions of the following licenses.
> >
> > The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details
> > see src/mx/effects/assets."
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/2/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> >
> >You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked
> and it’s just referenced in template html.
> >
> >So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.
> >
> >> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?
> If we only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or
> NOTICE
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> >>
> >>   Please look at:
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>
> >>   AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
> >>   AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
> >>
> >>   Where should the mention go?
> >>
> >>
> >>   [1]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>   [2]
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=222MrhuSmsWT%2FvvOoZwNtxBMMaPoyEj0Jqr6veeWZW4%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Harbs 
OK. Missed that too.

Either way, looks like we’re fine. :-)

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> Open Sans is bundled in TourDeFlex
> examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/src/mx/effects/assets/OpenSans-Regular.ttf
> 
> And is mentioned in LICENSE:
> 
> " The examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules includes a number of subcomponents 
> with
> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
> code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and
> conditions of the following licenses. 
> 
> The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details
> see src/mx/effects/assets."
> 
> HTH,
> -Alex
> 
> On 6/2/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked and 
> it’s just referenced in template html.
> 
>So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.
> 
>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>> 
>> What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?  If we 
>> only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or NOTICE
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
>> 
>>   Please look at: 
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
>>  
>> 
>> 
>>   AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
>>   AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
>> 
>>   Where should the mention go?
>> 
>> 
>>   
>> [1]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
>>  
>> 
>>   
>> [2]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=222MrhuSmsWT%2FvvOoZwNtxBMMaPoyEj0Jqr6veeWZW4%3D&reserved=0
>> 
> 
> 
>

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Alex Harui 
Open Sans is bundled in TourDeFlex
examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/src/mx/effects/assets/OpenSans-Regular.ttf

And is mentioned in LICENSE:

" The examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules includes a number of subcomponents 
with
separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
code for the these subcomponents is subject to the terms and
conditions of the following licenses. 

The Open-Sans font is available under Apache License 2.0. For details
see src/mx/effects/assets."

HTH,
-Alex

On 6/2/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked and 
it’s just referenced in template html.

So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?  If 
we only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or NOTICE
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>Please look at: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=LCBRLhNB9Q6am0%2FR281gk4ROcPvRfb3zj%2BcVg8ZTZC4%3D&reserved=0
 

> 
>AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
>AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
> 
>Where should the mention go?
> 
> 
>
[1]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=uQQfGlsD4FPXwQxQa%2FtV6QnWbb%2BARZLmslgqWjwLiR4%3D&reserved=0
 

>
[2]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4cfcd608975b493cabf508d8071894c1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267149489974222&sdata=222MrhuSmsWT%2FvvOoZwNtxBMMaPoyEj0Jqr6veeWZW4%3D&reserved=0
>

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Harbs 
You are right. I did not realize it wasn’t included. I just checked and it’s 
just referenced in template html.

So, we don’t need a mention of either Open Sans or Lato AFAICT.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
> 
> What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?  If we 
> only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or NOTICE
> 
> Thanks,
> -Alex
> 
> On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:
> 
>Please look at: 
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=0H%2FknqERpKnGFoL8Uqe0%2BKOxf4FEzOswCgiFEF1atg0%3D&reserved=0
>  
> 
> 
>AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
>AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]
> 
>Where should the mention go?
> 
> 
>
> [1]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=Gww6IGl1a1O6%2Bt78qK5KtXVDel4LwyugNkDvTOerteI%3D&reserved=0
>  
> 
>
> [2]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=yV5I1VmY%2FrN30B2LhTjkbn3rjdewBjizh%2BlofvQdhk4%3D&reserved=0
>

Re: Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Alex Harui 
What are the paths to the SIL bits in our repos or release artifacts?  If we 
only use it and don't bundle it, then it does not go in LICENSE or NOTICE

Thanks,
-Alex

On 6/2/20, 10:04 AM, "Harbs"  wrote:

Please look at: 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fcommit%2Fd0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=0H%2FknqERpKnGFoL8Uqe0%2BKOxf4FEzOswCgiFEF1atg0%3D&reserved=0
 


AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]

Where should the mention go?



[1]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23weak-copyleft-licenses&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=Gww6IGl1a1O6%2Bt78qK5KtXVDel4LwyugNkDvTOerteI%3D&reserved=0
 


[2]https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Fresolved.html%23appropriately-labelled-condition&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf7f3decd2dd140f2e69108d807170825%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637267142788774766&sdata=yV5I1VmY%2FrN30B2LhTjkbn3rjdewBjizh%2BlofvQdhk4%3D&reserved=0

Mention of SIL license

2020-06-02 Thread Harbs 
Please look at: 
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/commit/d0a58359f34f585bbabe4e72e838b4986c178b9b
 


AIUI, SIL is category b.[1]
AIUI, category b licenses should have a mention[2]

Where should the mention go?


[1]https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#weak-copyleft-licenses 

[2]https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#appropriately-labelled-condition