Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

2020-04-18 Thread Christofer Dutz
I wasn't referring to notice and licence files.


Von: Alex Harui 
Gesendet: Samstag, 18. April 2020 01:14
An: dev@royale.apache.org 
Betreff: Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

Please do not add an Apache header to the README or NOTICE (or the LICENSE).  
I'm pretty sure it is just a convention to not add the header.  Headers are not 
a legal thing, they are just helpful signposts.  A missing header does not 
change the copyright of the content.  I would also argue that there isn't 
anything worth copyrighting in these files.

I thought Apache didn't like markdown files for README/RELEASE_NOTES.  They 
look great on Github, but can be less readable in plain text.  Maybe that's 
changed though.

I would prefer that there aren't lots of README/RELEASE_NOTES in the tree, so 
not sure we should recursively exclude all .md files.

My.2 cents,
-Alex

On 4/17/20, 11:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz"  wrote:

Hi all.

So what is the difference between code and documentation?
I would say none.
So if I would be asked, I'd probably add the headers to all md, adoc, 
whatsoever files.

Chris

Am 17.04.20, 19:02 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :

totally

El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 18:58, Yishay Weiss 
()
escribió:

> Thanks. Doesn’t it make more sense to recursively exclude *.md files,
> something like
>
> **/*.md
>
> ?
>
> From: aha...@apache.org<mailto:aha...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:14 PM
> To: comm...@royale.apache.org<mailto:comm...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-compiler.gitdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C00d54869fbb64bc5383908d7e2fb1061%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227440263647213sdata=FU01dhyhRS3Tows8tzsh6tRpewOT5EBKHsppBdmiy5s%3Dreserved=0
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new c61b3d0  fix build
> c61b3d0 is described below
>
> commit c61b3d0aa2159a902392307ebcbb53312eb93dce
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 09:14:31 2020 -0700
>
> fix build
> ---
>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index a9cd598..53af767 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
>  LICENSE*
>  NOTICE*
>  README*
> -RELEASE_NOTES*
> +**/RELEASE_NOTES*
>  
>  
>  fb.properties
>
>

--
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C00d54869fbb64bc5383908d7e2fb1061%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227440263647213sdata=IUBNebxRAN8NJke78spKrg%2FzGFCohJaOKTpdhlvfYbE%3Dreserved=0





Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

2020-04-17 Thread Alex Harui
Please do not add an Apache header to the README or NOTICE (or the LICENSE).  
I'm pretty sure it is just a convention to not add the header.  Headers are not 
a legal thing, they are just helpful signposts.  A missing header does not 
change the copyright of the content.  I would also argue that there isn't 
anything worth copyrighting in these files.

I thought Apache didn't like markdown files for README/RELEASE_NOTES.  They 
look great on Github, but can be less readable in plain text.  Maybe that's 
changed though.

I would prefer that there aren't lots of README/RELEASE_NOTES in the tree, so 
not sure we should recursively exclude all .md files.

My.2 cents,
-Alex

On 4/17/20, 11:13 AM, "Christofer Dutz"  wrote:

Hi all.

So what is the difference between code and documentation? 
I would say none. 
So if I would be asked, I'd probably add the headers to all md, adoc, 
whatsoever files.

Chris

Am 17.04.20, 19:02 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :

totally

El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 18:58, Yishay Weiss 
()
escribió:

> Thanks. Doesn’t it make more sense to recursively exclude *.md files,
> something like
>
> **/*.md
>
> ?
>
> From: aha...@apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:14 PM
> To: comm...@royale.apache.org
> Subject: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-compiler.gitdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C00d54869fbb64bc5383908d7e2fb1061%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227440263647213sdata=FU01dhyhRS3Tows8tzsh6tRpewOT5EBKHsppBdmiy5s%3Dreserved=0
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new c61b3d0  fix build
> c61b3d0 is described below
>
> commit c61b3d0aa2159a902392307ebcbb53312eb93dce
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 09:14:31 2020 -0700
>
> fix build
> ---
>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index a9cd598..53af767 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
>  LICENSE*
>  NOTICE*
>  README*
> -RELEASE_NOTES*
> +**/RELEASE_NOTES*
>  
>  
>  fb.properties
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira

https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosroviradata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C00d54869fbb64bc5383908d7e2fb1061%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637227440263647213sdata=IUBNebxRAN8NJke78spKrg%2FzGFCohJaOKTpdhlvfYbE%3Dreserved=0





Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

2020-04-17 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hi all.

So what is the difference between code and documentation? 
I would say none. 
So if I would be asked, I'd probably add the headers to all md, adoc, 
whatsoever files.

Chris

Am 17.04.20, 19:02 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" :

totally

El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 18:58, Yishay Weiss ()
escribió:

> Thanks. Doesn’t it make more sense to recursively exclude *.md files,
> something like
>
> **/*.md
>
> ?
>
> From: aha...@apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:14 PM
> To: comm...@royale.apache.org
> Subject: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new c61b3d0  fix build
> c61b3d0 is described below
>
> commit c61b3d0aa2159a902392307ebcbb53312eb93dce
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 09:14:31 2020 -0700
>
> fix build
> ---
>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index a9cd598..53af767 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
>  LICENSE*
>  NOTICE*
>  README*
> -RELEASE_NOTES*
> +**/RELEASE_NOTES*
>  
>  
>  fb.properties
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira



Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

2020-04-17 Thread Carlos Rovira
totally

El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 18:58, Yishay Weiss ()
escribió:

> Thanks. Doesn’t it make more sense to recursively exclude *.md files,
> something like
>
> **/*.md
>
> ?
>
> From: aha...@apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:14 PM
> To: comm...@royale.apache.org
> Subject: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
>  new c61b3d0  fix build
> c61b3d0 is described below
>
> commit c61b3d0aa2159a902392307ebcbb53312eb93dce
> Author: Alex Harui 
> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 09:14:31 2020 -0700
>
> fix build
> ---
>  pom.xml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
> index a9cd598..53af767 100644
> --- a/pom.xml
> +++ b/pom.xml
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
>  LICENSE*
>  NOTICE*
>  README*
> -RELEASE_NOTES*
> +**/RELEASE_NOTES*
>  
>  
>  fb.properties
>
>

-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira


RE: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

2020-04-17 Thread Yishay Weiss
Thanks. Doesn’t it make more sense to recursively exclude *.md files, something 
like

**/*.md

?

From: aha...@apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:14 PM
To: comm...@royale.apache.org
Subject: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: fix build

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

aharui pushed a commit to branch develop
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-compiler.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push:
 new c61b3d0  fix build
c61b3d0 is described below

commit c61b3d0aa2159a902392307ebcbb53312eb93dce
Author: Alex Harui 
AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 09:14:31 2020 -0700

fix build
---
 pom.xml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
index a9cd598..53af767 100644
--- a/pom.xml
+++ b/pom.xml
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
 LICENSE*
 NOTICE*
 README*
-RELEASE_NOTES*
+**/RELEASE_NOTES*
 
 
 fb.properties