Review Request 53826: added user document for Checkpoint callbacks
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53826/ --- Review request for samza. Bugs: SAMZA-1046 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1046 Repository: samza Description --- added user documentation for Checkpoint callbacks Diffs - docs/learn/documentation/versioned/container/checkpointing.md 6f8c6d694be92f973af456ddd518d70540abe5c3 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53826/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Boris Shkolnik
Re: SAMZA-469 - scala 2.11 / move to java?
Thanks a lot ! Please let us know if you need any help :) Cheers! Navina On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Thunder Stumpgeswrote: > OK! We are in a push for the next couple weeks, but I will look to put > some time to this in the next month or there about. > > Thanks! > Thunder > > > -Original Message- > From: Navina Ramesh [mailto:nram...@linkedin.com.INVALID] > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 2:19 PM > To: dev@samza.apache.org > Subject: Re: SAMZA-469 - scala 2.11 / move to java? > > Hi Thunder, > Sorry about the late response. I was refreshing my memory of SAMZA-469 :) > > Is there something preventing this from getting into a release? > > Seems to me like the main roadblock on upgrading to scala 2.11 was > related to JDK6. We have already moved away from JDK6 and JDK7. So, I > don't see anything blocking us from upgrading to scala 2.11, if someone can > invest some time and push it out the door :) > > There is mention in that issue of going away from scala altogether. Is > there another issue which details this? When would that happen? > > By going away, I believe we decided to not add more scala > > code/dependency > to the code base so that eventually, we can replace them all with jdk > based lambdas. There is no concrete plan on when and how this will happen. > So, imo, it wouldn't be anytime soon :D > > if some effort is needed to make the move to 2.11, we would be glad to > help out! > > That will be much appreciated! I don't think we have seen any strong > motivation for doing this within LinkedIn. If you guys can help us > upgrade, that will be awesome!! > > Thanks! > Navina > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Thunder Stumpges > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We are looking to get our projects upgraded to scala 2.11 as some of > > our dependencies are dropping their compiling of 2.10 libraries. We > > found > > SAMZA-469 which looks to have had a patch for some time, however the > > last couple comments seem pretty shaky about when (or if!?) support > > will be available. > > > > Is there something preventing this from getting into a release? > > > > There is mention in that issue of going away from scala altogether. > > Is there another issue which details this? When would that happen? > > > > Thanks, and if some effort is needed to make the move to 2.11, we > > would be glad to help out! > > Thunder Stumges > > > > > > > -- > Navina R. > -- Navina R.
Re: Review Request 53297: Initial version of adding metrics into samza rest.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53297/#review156078 --- Ship it! I'll try commiting it once the patch is posted on a JIRA - Jake Maes On Nov. 16, 2016, 5:44 a.m., Shanthoosh Venkataraman wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/53297/ > --- > > (Updated Nov. 16, 2016, 5:44 a.m.) > > > Review request for samza and Jake Maes. > > > Repository: samza > > > Description > --- > > This patch aims at enabling users to define custom reporters to send metrics > from the monitors. Configurations required for the definition of the metrics > reporters follows the same convention as of the samza jobs. > Updated diff = > Adding monitorName in MonitorFactory getMonitor method to enable creation of > namespaced metrics from each of the monitor. monitorName can be used by > MonitorFactory implementations in the metrics that are created and reported > from them. > > > Diffs > - > > docs/learn/documentation/versioned/rest/monitors.md > 46678bbe5fed99f767c3324dc9578ee1a64cec66 > samza-core/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/util/MetricsReporterLoader.java > PRE-CREATION > samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/container/SamzaContainer.scala > e0468ee89c89fd720834461771ebb36475475bcb > > samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/metrics/ContainerProcessManagerMetrics.scala > f24beb1e099dd44b15b475e0a4a7f70560c6965e > samza-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/MonitorFactory.java > c38a5d8f737ee5cf39a4876697025fa9cd300bff > samza-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/MonitorLoader.java > dcf9e5734b1d97e37e4fd0e89cc7f525a37a0d65 > samza-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/SamzaMonitorService.java > 754ad82af9ef0f2334ec629160be39d183df1b38 > samza-rest/src/main/java/org/apache/samza/rest/SamzaRestService.java > 2a3e83a24a5343bb53b93fc9d0a647c1b253714b > samza-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/TestMonitorService.java > e75f4946f38523284921798578f2a3db9c02f599 > > samza-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/mock/DummyMonitorFactory.java > ccc534efc8594837f83b9126ca3d4ee22d8fbb05 > > samza-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/mock/ExceptionThrowingMonitorFactory.java > af414b46dc5c2ff1579deb2c247cd94388a0b3ea > > samza-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/monitor/mock/MockMonitorFactory.java > 5b19001eb5db51b6cc4440cf74be92f285ab0209 > samza-rest/src/test/java/org/apache/samza/rest/TestSamzaRestService.java > PRE-CREATION > > samza-yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/job/yarn/SamzaAppMasterMetrics.scala > 8a5b4aaea6e11a5af999f12d50e5b6135dbc70ca > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53297/diff/ > > > Testing > --- > > Unit tests are done to verify the intended functionality. > > > Thanks, > > Shanthoosh Venkataraman > >