Re: Fw: [DISCUSSION] Rsocket
It sounds good to me. Do we have any proposal for providing the support of RSocket in ServiceComb Java Chassis? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 9:40 AM Liubao (A) wrote: > > Good. Adding new programming specification for java-chassis is also very > important feature. Diving into the topic is welcome. > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: YL G [mailto:gylg...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2019年12月5日 15:33 > 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org > 主题: Re: Fw: [DISCUSSION] Rsocket > > According to my understanding, Rsocket and grpc are very different. > The main idea of Rsocket is stream. > In JDK, we can use CompletebleFuture to asynchronous programming. > When there is only one object like *CompletebleFuture*, it's OK. > But when we have a List, we would prefer it could like a stream: generate an > element and return an element instead of waiting for the whole list done and > return like *CompletebleFuture*. To achieve this, the whole system must > be built on the stream. > Rsocket can help at the protocol level. It's not only a protocol, but also > provide a new programming specification like *Flux*. > > Zheng Feng 于 2019年12月4日周三 19:24写道： > > > At first glance, it looks like another gPRC but I just find this > > article [1] to discuss the differences between gRPC and RSocket. > > I think we need to keep eye on it. > > > > [1] > > https://medium.com/netifi/differences-between-grpc-and-rsocket-e736c95 > > 4e60 > > > > yhs0092 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:57写道： > > > > > This is the content of the mail "[DISCUSSION] Rsocket is hot now" > > > from gylgeek . > > > There seems some problem with his mailbox : ) > > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely > > > > > > > > > Yao Haishi > > > yhs0...@163.com > > > > > > > > > > > > - Forwarded Message - > > > > > > From： gylg...@gmail.com > > > Date： 12/4/2019 17:50 > > > To： > > > Subject： [DISCUSSION] Rsocket > > > RSocket is a binary protocol for use on byte stream transports such > > > as TCP, WebSockets, and Aeron. It enables the following symmetric > > interaction > > > models via async message passing over a single connection: > > > > > > request/response (stream of 1) > > > request/stream (finite stream of many) fire-and-forget (no response) > > > event subscription (infinite stream of many) Learn more at: > > > http://rsocket.io > > > https://github.com/rsocket/rsocket-java > > > Dubbo and SpringCloud already support Rsocket, and take Rsocketas a > > future > > > development trend. > > > In spring 5, spring marks asynchronous interfaces such as > > > asyncRestTemplate as @Deprecated , instead to recommend > > > webflux(based on Rsocket). > > > Dubbo 3.0.0-snapshot also supports responsive programming based on > > Rsocket. > > > Reactive should consist of two parts: asynchronous functional > > > programming and streaming programming. But service-comb don't have > > > streaming programming. > > > Rsocket can also be used in service mesh. Learn more at: > > > https://www.netifi.com/solutions-servicemesh > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Guo YongLiang. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0
+1 I check done: - Git tag and commit id are OK. - mvn clean install build OK. - all the links above are fine - hashes and signature are good. Bin Ma 于2019年12月6日周五 上午9:09写道： > Hi All, > > This is a call for Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0 > > > Release Candidate : > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/servicecomb-toolkit/0.2.0/rc-01/ > > Staging Repository : > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicecomb-1409 > > Release Tag : > https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit/releases/tag/0.2.0 > > Release CommitID : e95ba3c7b27673ee4e360d64cc1ccce43f70f18e > > Release Notes : > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321626&version=12346158 > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate : > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/KEYS > > Voting will start now ( Friday, 6nd Dec, 2019) and will remain open for > at-least 72 hours, Request all PMC members to give their vote. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0 > [ ] +0 No Opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because > > On the behalf of ServiceComb Team > > > Wishes & Regards > --- > Mabin >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0
+1 1. Maven build passed: mvn clean install -Pjacoco 2. SHA512 signature checked 3. PGP signature checked Bin Ma 于2019年12月6日周五 上午9:09写道： > > Hi All, > > This is a call for Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0 > > > Release Candidate : > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/servicecomb-toolkit/0.2.0/rc-01/ > > Staging Repository : > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicecomb-1409 > > Release Tag : > https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit/releases/tag/0.2.0 > > Release CommitID : e95ba3c7b27673ee4e360d64cc1ccce43f70f18e > > Release Notes : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321626&version=12346158 > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate : > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/KEYS > > Voting will start now ( Friday, 6nd Dec, 2019) and will remain open for > at-least 72 hours, Request all PMC members to give their vote. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0 > [ ] +0 No Opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because > > On the behalf of ServiceComb Team > > > Wishes & Regards > --- > Mabin -- Daniel Qian Apache Committer(chanjarster) blog：https://chanjarster.github.io github：https://github.com/chanjarster segmentfault: https://segmentfault.com/u/chanjarster
答复: Fw: [DISCUSSION] Rsocket
Good. Adding new programming specification for java-chassis is also very important feature. Diving into the topic is welcome. -邮件原件- 发件人: YL G [mailto:gylg...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2019年12月5日 15:33 收件人: dev@servicecomb.apache.org 主题: Re: Fw: [DISCUSSION] Rsocket According to my understanding, Rsocket and grpc are very different. The main idea of Rsocket is stream. In JDK, we can use CompletebleFuture to asynchronous programming. When there is only one object like *CompletebleFuture*, it's OK. But when we have a List, we would prefer it could like a stream: generate an element and return an element instead of waiting for the whole list done and return like *CompletebleFuture*. To achieve this, the whole system must be built on the stream. Rsocket can help at the protocol level. It's not only a protocol, but also provide a new programming specification like *Flux*. Zheng Feng 于 2019年12月4日周三 19:24写道： > At first glance, it looks like another gPRC but I just find this > article [1] to discuss the differences between gRPC and RSocket. > I think we need to keep eye on it. > > [1] > https://medium.com/netifi/differences-between-grpc-and-rsocket-e736c95 > 4e60 > > yhs0092 于2019年12月4日周三 下午5:57写道： > > > This is the content of the mail "[DISCUSSION] Rsocket is hot now" > > from gylgeek . > > There seems some problem with his mailbox : ) > > > > > > Yours sincerely > > > > > > Yao Haishi > > yhs0...@163.com > > > > > > > > - Forwarded Message - > > > > From： gylg...@gmail.com > > Date： 12/4/2019 17:50 > > To： > > Subject： [DISCUSSION] Rsocket > > RSocket is a binary protocol for use on byte stream transports such > > as TCP, WebSockets, and Aeron. It enables the following symmetric > interaction > > models via async message passing over a single connection: > > > > request/response (stream of 1) > > request/stream (finite stream of many) fire-and-forget (no response) > > event subscription (infinite stream of many) Learn more at: > > http://rsocket.io > > https://github.com/rsocket/rsocket-java > > Dubbo and SpringCloud already support Rsocket, and take Rsocketas a > future > > development trend. > > In spring 5, spring marks asynchronous interfaces such as > > asyncRestTemplate as @Deprecated , instead to recommend > > webflux(based on Rsocket). > > Dubbo 3.0.0-snapshot also supports responsive programming based on > Rsocket. > > Reactive should consist of two parts: asynchronous functional > > programming and streaming programming. But service-comb don't have > > streaming programming. > > Rsocket can also be used in service mesh. Learn more at: > > https://www.netifi.com/solutions-servicemesh > > > > > > Best regards, > > Guo YongLiang. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0
Hi All, This is a call for Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Toolkit version 0.2.0 Release Candidate : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/servicecomb-toolkit/0.2.0/rc-01/ Staging Repository : https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheservicecomb-1409 Release Tag : https://github.com/apache/servicecomb-toolkit/releases/tag/0.2.0 Release CommitID : e95ba3c7b27673ee4e360d64cc1ccce43f70f18e Release Notes : https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321626&version=12346158 Keys to verify the Release Candidate : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/KEYS Voting will start now ( Friday, 6nd Dec, 2019) and will remain open for at-least 72 hours, Request all PMC members to give their vote. [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.2.0 [ ] +0 No Opinion [ ] -1 Do not release this package because On the behalf of ServiceComb Team Wishes & Regards --- Mabin
