Re: Code freeze 1.0.x branch

2007-01-01 Thread Craig McClanahan

On 1/1/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 1/1/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 1/1/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The SHALE_1_0_X branch [1] has been created. Over the next day, it
  will be used to prepare the proposed v1.0.4 artifacts and svn tag.
 
  My preference would be to have no commits to the branch when releases
  are being prepared and voted on (relevant commits to trunk that need
  to be backported can wait a day or two, unless its a showstopper for
  the release). I will ping this thread when this is done for v1.0.4,
  and the branch is open for general commits.


 Does this also imply that the trunk is now open for new features?  I
want to
 spend a bit of time between plays :-) on things like SHALE-262, and it'd
be
 easier to just work on the trunk now, rather than branching shale-test
and
 then merging later.

snip/

Indeed, now that we have multiple lines of development, development
need not stop just because a release is imminent. The v104 tag will
come from the 10x branch, so the trunk is no longer relevant for the
release ;-)

More generally, I propose we have the following procedure for future
releases:

(1) At the appropriate time, the RM declares a code freeze on the
relevant branch
(2) Development continues in all other branches, and developers keep
notes of any changes that need to be ported to the frozen branch
(3) When freeze is over, developers commit pending changes

Showstoppers that require a fix to the frozen branch restart the process
at (1).



Sounds like a good general policy, although I suspect there generally will
*not* be pending changes that we did not already discuss and decide on --
it will probably amount to a few patches that were deemed not critical to
getting a maintenance release out the door.  But time will tell :-).

In the mean time, I'll go ahead and update the trunk version numbers to
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT, per our previous discussions.  I've also added a JIRA
version for this, so we can start tagging issues for new development as they
get dealt with there.

-Rahul


Craig



(And no, I'm *not* going to propose that we add a new feature to 1.0.4 at
 the last minute :-).

 Craig


 -Rahul
 
  [1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shale/framework/branches/SHALE_1_0_X/
 





Re: Code freeze 1.0.x branch

2007-01-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar

On 1/1/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 1/1/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

snip/


 More generally, I propose we have the following procedure for future
 releases:

 (1) At the appropriate time, the RM declares a code freeze on the
 relevant branch
 (2) Development continues in all other branches, and developers keep
 notes of any changes that need to be ported to the frozen branch
 (3) When freeze is over, developers commit pending changes

 Showstoppers that require a fix to the frozen branch restart the process
 at (1).


Sounds like a good general policy, although I suspect there generally will
*not* be pending changes that we did not already discuss and decide on --
it will probably amount to a few patches that were deemed not critical to
getting a maintenance release out the door.  But time will tell :-).


snap/

Agreed :-)



In the mean time, I'll go ahead and update the trunk version numbers to
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT, per our previous discussions.  I've also added a JIRA
version for this, so we can start tagging issues for new development as they
get dealt with there.


snip/

Sounds good, thanks.

-Rahul




Craig