Re: SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL code in myfaces

[Craig McClanahan]

On 6/20/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Forwarding to the Shale project, which has the same issue:

http://tinyurl.com/28e558



Thanks for the forward, Niall.  For Shale, I've replaced the two DTDs
present in Shale (we don't currently use the schema for 1.2, but will
likely include it in the future) with unmodified versions from the
provided links, and then added the following text to the NOTICE.txt
file for the shale-tiger module (which is the one including these
DTDs):

   This product contains software written by Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
   and licensed under the CDDL license.

Do we (Apache) consider this sufficient to indicate our election for
the CDDL license, or do we need to do more?  Or does it even matter,
given that we are electing to distribute our combined works under the
Apache License?


Niall


Craig McClanahan





On 6/21/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices
> changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd for
> faces 1.0 and 1.1.
>
> Please take a look at the newly updated files at:
>
> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_1_2.xsd
> http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd
> http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd
>
> The notices in these files should be self-explanatory. The files in
> the faces repository should be refreshed with the latest versions
> from the web. The NOTICE file in the distribution should be updated
> to reflect the CDDL license (we don't want the GPL license option do
> we).
>
> If there are other similar cases, please let me know and I'll try to
> get them updated as well.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> On May 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > Does anyone here besides me see a problem with this copyright:
> >
> > 
> >
> > appearing in these two files?
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/
> > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd?
> > view=markup
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/
> > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd?
> > revision=374886&view=markup
> >
> > These two DTDs are part of the JSR 127 spec, so they should not be
> > Sun proprietary/confidential. Maybe the comments are proprietary/
> > confidential?  Am I wrong for being annoyed that someone with
> > commit privs project would check files into an ASF repo with this
> > copyright statement, regardless of the technical justification?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > -
> > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> > only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> > and policies of the ASF.  See  for
> > official ASF policies and documents.
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
>

-
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See  for
official ASF policies and documents.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL code in myfaces

[Gary VanMatre]

Yeah, that's weird.  Especially if you google search "Sun 
proprietary/confidential CDDL".  Myfaces is using the same DTD here [1]?

You should ask someone in licensing at apache.  Maybe you can get an answer in 
less time [2].


[1] 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/examples/simple/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/examples-config.xml?view=markup
[2] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-444

Gary
-- Original message -- 
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> Forwarding to the Shale project, which has the same issue: 
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/28e558 
> 
> Niall 
> 
> On 6/21/07, Craig L Russell wrote: 
> > I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices 
> > changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd for 
> > faces 1.0 and 1.1. 
> > 
> > Please take a look at the newly updated files at: 
> > 
> > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_1_2.xsd 
> > http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd 
> > http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd 
> > 
> > The notices in these files should be self-explanatory. The files in 
> > the faces repository should be refreshed with the latest versions 
> > from the web. The NOTICE file in the distribution should be updated 
> > to reflect the CDDL license (we don't want the GPL license option do 
> > we). 
> > 
> > If there are other similar cases, please let me know and I'll try to 
> > get them updated as well. 
> > 
> > Regards, 
> > 
> > Craig 
> > 
> > On May 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: 
> > 
> > > Does anyone here besides me see a problem with this copyright: 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > appearing in these two files? 
> > > 
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/ 
> > > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd? 
> > > view=markup 
> > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/ 
> > > resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd? 
> > > revision=374886&view=markup 
> > > 
> > > These two DTDs are part of the JSR 127 spec, so they should not be 
> > > Sun proprietary/confidential. Maybe the comments are proprietary/ 
> > > confidential? Am I wrong for being annoyed that someone with 
> > > commit privs project would check files into an ASF repo with this 
> > > copyright statement, regardless of the technical justification? 
> > > 
> > > Bill 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - 
> > > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational 
> > > only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not 
> > > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions 
> > > and policies of the ASF. See for 
> > > official ASF policies and documents. 
> > > - 
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 
> > 
> > Craig Russell 
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! 
> > 
> > 
> > 

Re: SUN PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL code in myfaces

[Niall Pemberton]

Forwarding to the Shale project, which has the same issue:

http://tinyurl.com/28e558

Niall

On 6/21/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices
changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd for
faces 1.0 and 1.1.

Please take a look at the newly updated files at:

http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_1_2.xsd
http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd
http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd

The notices in these files should be self-explanatory. The files in
the faces repository should be refreshed with the latest versions
from the web. The NOTICE file in the distribution should be updated
to reflect the CDDL license (we don't want the GPL license option do
we).

If there are other similar cases, please let me know and I'll try to
get them updated as well.

Regards,

Craig

On May 21, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:

> Does anyone here besides me see a problem with this copyright:
>
> 
>
> appearing in these two files?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/
> resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd?
> view=markup
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/
> resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/web-facesconfig_1_1.dtd?
> revision=374886&view=markup
>
> These two DTDs are part of the JSR 127 spec, so they should not be
> Sun proprietary/confidential. Maybe the comments are proprietary/
> confidential?  Am I wrong for being annoyed that someone with
> commit privs project would check files into an ASF repo with this
> copyright statement, regardless of the technical justification?
>
> Bill
>
>
> -
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF.  See  for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!