Re: [PR] SLING-11917 Evaluate constructor parameter names via reflection [sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


henrykuijpers commented on PR #45:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/pull/45#issuecomment-1817419374

   Wouldn't that be as simple as adding another compile step in the project, 
for a separate source folder, that will have a sling model available to test?  


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-12164) Metadata Extraction Broken

2023-11-17 Thread Dan Klco (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Klco resolved SLING-12164.
--
Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-app-cms/commit/6eb6abb410baebe1fd9e1efecde6c03d3fea1554

> Metadata Extraction Broken
> --
>
> Key: SLING-12164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12164
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: App CMS
>Affects Versions: App CMS 1.1.8
>Reporter: Dan Klco
>Assignee: Dan Klco
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: App CMS 1.1.10
>
>
> SLING-12120 introduced a regression where the metadata extraction broke due 
> to both the tika-parsers and tika-bundle being present in the feature model.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Created] (SLING-12164) Metadata Extraction Broken

2023-11-17 Thread Dan Klco (Jira)
Dan Klco created SLING-12164:


 Summary: Metadata Extraction Broken
 Key: SLING-12164
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12164
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: App CMS
Affects Versions: App CMS 1.1.8
Reporter: Dan Klco
Assignee: Dan Klco
 Fix For: App CMS 1.1.10


SLING-12120 introduced a regression where the metadata extraction broke due to 
both the tika-parsers and tika-bundle being present in the feature model.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-11917 Evaluate constructor parameter names via reflection [sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #45:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/pull/45#issuecomment-1817100109

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [1 Code 
Smell](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   
[![93.8%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/90-16px.png
 
'93.8%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=new_coverage=list)
 [93.8% 
Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=new_coverage=list)
  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=45=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: Sling Johnzon Wrapper & Jakarta JSON

2023-11-17 Thread Eric Norman
Is the johnzon 2.x implementation better than the parsson library that we
are already including in the starter?

I've just been switching the geronimo-json_1.0_spec and johnzon-core
dependencies to these:



jakarta.json
jakarta.json-api
2.1.1
provided




org.eclipse.parsson
parsson
1.1.1
test


Regards,
-Eric

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 3:03 AM Stefan Seifert
 wrote:

> in context of SLING-12058 we are migrating lots of modules from javax.json
> to jakarta.json. this works fine for modules using javax.json directly.
>
> however, we have a few modules which are using johnzon, which uses
> javax.json internally. since version johnzon 1.2.5 (we are using johnzon
> 1.2.21 in latest wrapper bundle) johnzon ships an additional artifact with
> classifier "jakarta", which uses jakarta.json internally. both artifacts
> with and without "jakarta" are identical, except the internal usage of the
> package name. our wrapper bundle contains the version using javax.json.
>
> for non-bundles like maven plugins we can just switch to the artifact with
> "jakarta". but this will not work for our bundles. we cannot ship both
> artifacts with and without "jakarta" classifier as wrapper bundles and
> export them both in OSGi with the same version number. i've found at least
> one bundle where this is already used (but not released) [1]. it stumbled
> about this in PR [2]. the bundles might work anyway as the bundle compiled
> against the johnzon "jakarta" affect should also work with the javax.json
> version at runtime, but this feels like a slippery slope.
>
> according to [3] johnzon is using a different way starting from version
> 2.0 (which seems to be released a few days ago, although the homepage is
> not updated yet): in version 2.0 johnzon uses only jakarta.json.
>
> so it think the correct way is to create and deploy an additional wrapper
> bundle for johnzon 2.0, which we can deploy side-by-side with the old
> wrapper bundle with 1.x. i assume we have to support both of them for quite
> a time, as there is a lot of code out there using johnzon 1.x.
>
> WDYT?
>
> stefan
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-installer-factory-feature/blob/867bd44f0991cedd130314d833c9aac29ae3f36c/pom.xml#L134-L140
> [2] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2
> [3] https://johnzon.apache.org/download.html
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0

2023-11-17 Thread Daniel Klco
+1

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:57 AM Jörg Hoh 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Am Fr., 17. Nov. 2023 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Stefan Seifert
> :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 5 issues in this release:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12353545=Text=12310710
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2810/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> >
> >
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 2810 /tmp/sling-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >   [ ]  0 Don't care
> >   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > stefan
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jörg Hoh,
>
> https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
> Twitter: @joerghoh
>


Re: [PR] SLING-12160 Prevent ConcurrentModificationException in [sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


kwin commented on PR #107:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/pull/107#issuecomment-1816772549

   @joerghoh Any idea if the test failures are related?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12163 Update ASF Parent to v31 [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/39#issuecomment-1816746022

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-parent=39)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12163 Update ASF Parent to v31 [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/39#issuecomment-1816741865

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-parent=39)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=39=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=39=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-11842 Drop Java 8 as build JDK [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #38:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/38#issuecomment-1816740565

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-parent=38)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-11842 Drop Java 8 as build JDK [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #38:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/38#issuecomment-1816736209

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-parent=38)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=38=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=38=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[PR] SLING-12163 Update ASF Parent to v31 [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


kwin opened a new pull request, #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/39

   (no comment)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (SLING-12163) Update ASF Parent to 31

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
Konrad Windszus created SLING-12163:
---

 Summary: Update ASF Parent to 31
 Key: SLING-12163
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12163
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: General
Reporter: Konrad Windszus
Assignee: Konrad Windszus
 Fix For: Parent 60 (Java 11)


https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/releases/tag/apache-31



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-12080) Update to Bnd 7.0 and require at least Java 17 for build

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konrad Windszus resolved SLING-12080.
-
Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/commit/4ab420b0ceadb057358fe1e957a93ba86b04c6f8.

> Update to Bnd 7.0 and require at least Java 17 for build
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12080
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12080
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: General
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Bundle Parent 60 (Java 17)
>
>
> Bnd 7.0 (https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/wiki/Changes-in-7.0.0) is out and 
> requires Java 17 for build.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Assigned] (SLING-11842) Drop Java 8 support from Parent

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konrad Windszus reassigned SLING-11842:
---

Assignee: Konrad Windszus

> Drop Java 8 support from Parent
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-11842
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11842
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: General
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Parent 60 (Java 11)
>
>
> Given that Java 8 is EOL since quite some time, and soon Java 21 will be the 
> default LTS release we should drop support for Java 8 (that allows to get rid 
> of some profiles and plugins like 
> https://www.mojohaus.org/animal-sniffer/animal-sniffer-maven-plugin/).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12080 Update to Bnd 7.0.0 [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


kwin merged PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/37


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12080 Update to Bnd 7.0.0 [sling-parent]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #37:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-parent/pull/37#issuecomment-1816721935

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-parent=37)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-parent=37=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=37)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=37=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-parent=37=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12149) ResourceResolver: Illegal mode passthrough for resource provider null

2023-11-17 Thread Joerg Hoh (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joerg Hoh closed SLING-12149.
-

> ResourceResolver: Illegal mode passthrough for resource provider null
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12149
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12149
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: ResourceResolver
>Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.11.2
>Reporter: Joerg Hoh
>Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Resource Resolver 1.11.4
>
>
> When trying the new ResourcResolver 1.11.2 I get this log message for 
> many/all ResourceProvider and the instance does not work:
> {noformat}
> 13.11.2023 15:41:18.003 *ERROR* [FelixStartLevel] 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.providers.ResourceProviderInfo Illegal 
> mode passthrough for resource provider null
> 13.11.2023 15:41:18.005 *WARN* [FelixStartLevel] 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.providers.ResourceProviderTracker 
> Ignoring invalid resource provider ResourceProviderInfo 
> [ref=[org.apache.sling.spi.resource.provider.ResourceProvider], path=/apps/, 
> useResourceAccessSecurity=false, authType=no, modifiable=false]
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Sling Resource Resolver 1.11.4

2023-11-17 Thread Jörg Hoh
Hi,

The vote has passed with the following result :

+1 (binding): Jörg Hoh, Robert Munteanu, Stefan Seifert, Julian
Sedding, Carsten Ziegeler, Daniel Klco


I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.



Am Di., 14. Nov. 2023 um 09:38 Uhr schrieb Jörg Hoh :

> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue in this 
> release:https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12353817=Text
>
> Staging 
> repository:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2808/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the 
> signatures:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 2808 /tmp/sling-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release
>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours1
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jörg Hoh,
>
> https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
> Twitter: @joerghoh
>


-- 
Cheers,
Jörg Hoh,

https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
Twitter: @joerghoh


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0

2023-11-17 Thread Jörg Hoh
+1

Am Fr., 17. Nov. 2023 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Stefan Seifert
:

> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues in this release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12353545=Text=12310710
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2810/
>
> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> signatures:
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh
>
> Usage:
> sh check_staged_release.sh 2810 /tmp/sling-staging
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release
>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
> stefan
>


-- 
Cheers,
Jörg Hoh,

https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
Twitter: @joerghoh


[PR] SLING-12161: sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak releases [sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


reschke opened a new pull request, #34:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock/pull/34

   (no comment)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Assigned] (SLING-12161) sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak releases

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke reassigned SLING-12161:
--

Assignee: Julian Reschke

> sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak releases
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12161
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12161
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: Testing
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock currently uses Oak 1.22.5; it 
> should use the current maintenance release 1.22.17.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-12161) sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak releases

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated SLING-12161:
---
Summary: sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak 
releases  (was: sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak 
maintenance release 1.22.17)

> sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak releases
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12161
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12161
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: Testing
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock currently uses Oak 1.22.5; it 
> should use the current maintenance release 1.22.17.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[PR] SLING-12162 - Update o.a.s.junit.core to jupiter 5.10.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


jsedding opened a new pull request, #21:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/21

   (no comment)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (SLING-12162) Update o.a.s.junit.core to jupiter 5.10.1

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)
Julian Sedding created SLING-12162:
--

 Summary: Update o.a.s.junit.core to jupiter 5.10.1
 Key: SLING-12162
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12162
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: JUnit Core
Affects Versions: JUnit Core 1.1.6
Reporter: Julian Sedding
Assignee: Julian Sedding


In the context of [PR 
#20|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/20], it 
turned out that a change between jupiter 5.10.0 and 5.10.1 brakes a test case.

I have identified the [relevant 
change|https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/pull/3500/files#diff-eec44cb3c2bd65dc0944562c5b919097b7995cbbd874f3ff6f9cd1dd170a2814R1506-L1510]
 to be stricter enforcement of a test method predicate. It turns out that we 
have a meta-test (we're running tests within tests for o.a.s.junit.core) that 
overrides and inherited test method, but does not itself add the `@Test` 
annotation on it. That way the test method in question is not found, which 
fails an assertion that checks if any meta-tests were run.

cc [~apelluru]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


stefanseifert commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1397426714


##
.sling-module.json:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{

Review Comment:
   i was able to build it locally on my windows 11 machine without problems - 
did not had time to dig deeper into the jenkins logs yet



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.8.2 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] commented on PR #1:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote/pull/1#issuecomment-1816550629

   OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when 
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next 
major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this 
major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`.
   
   If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts 
on it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.8.2 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru closed pull request #1: Bump junit from 4.8.2 to 4.13.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote/pull/1


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.8.2 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru commented on PR #1:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote/pull/1#issuecomment-1816550561

   No longer required since `4.13.2` is already using.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-12068) Migrate junit.remote to jakarta.json

2023-11-17 Thread Ashok Pelluru (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ashok Pelluru resolved SLING-12068.
---
Resolution: Fixed

> Migrate junit.remote to jakarta.json
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12068
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12068
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Ashok Pelluru
>Assignee: Ashok Pelluru
>Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12068: migrate to jakarta.json [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru merged PR #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-remote/pull/2


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (SLING-12161) sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to latest Oak maintenance release 1.22.17

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira)
Julian Reschke created SLING-12161:
--

 Summary: sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock: update to 
latest Oak maintenance release 1.22.17
 Key: SLING-12161
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12161
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Testing
Reporter: Julian Reschke


sling-org-apache-sling-testing-sling-mock currently uses Oak 1.22.5; it should 
use the current maintenance release 1.22.17.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1397402517


##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@
 
 org.apache.johnzon
 johnzon-core
-1.1.1
+jakarta

Review Comment:
   Thanks for moving the discussion into mailing list. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1397401791


##
.sling-module.json:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{

Review Comment:
   @stefanseifert Sure, temporarily disabled Windows builds because one of the 
test cases is failing. Unfortunately, addressing the issue is proving to be a 
bit challenging with MacBook. However, I'm exploring the possibility of using 
Windows Docker instances to see if I can tackle the problem from that angle.
   
   Do you have or anyone has suggestions or alternative approaches might help 
here.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12124) Inconsistent handling of empty selectors

2023-11-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-12124.


> Inconsistent handling of empty selectors
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12124
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12124
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Engine
>Affects Versions: Engine 2.15.6
>Reporter: Sagar Miglani
>Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Engine 2.15.8
>
> Attachments: inconsistent_empty_selectors.patch
>
>
> In accordance with the code found 
> [here|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-engine/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/engine/impl/request/RequestData.java#L563],
>  empty selectors are explicitly disallowed. However, the [parsing of 
> selectors|https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-engine/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/engine/impl/request/SlingRequestPathInfo.java#L93-L95]
>  is making request with all empty selector as valid.
> i.e:
> Requests will empty selectors like: "/test/resource/path..a...html" are 
> invalid
> While requests with all empty selectos "/test/resource/path.html" are 
> valid
> Which indicates an inconsistent behaviour.
> Attached tests to demonstrate the same ([^inconsistent_empty_selectors.patch])



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12152) IOException is not properly handled by error handling

2023-11-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-12152.


> IOException is not properly handled by error handling
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12152
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Engine
>Affects Versions: Engine 2.15.6
>Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
>Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Engine 2.15.8
>
>
> When a servlet (or code called by a servlet) is throwing an IOException, this 
> is currently not passed to the error handler. Instead the processor is 
> passing it on to the main servlet, assuming it is handling the case. However, 
> the main servlet is just logging and therefore an IOException does not result 
> in an error response send to the client



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12133) Include time spend in authentication in request log

2023-11-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-12133.


> Include time spend in authentication in request log
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-12133
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12133
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Engine
>Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
>Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Engine 2.15.8
>
>
> The request logging is currently triggered by a servlet filter. Filters run 
> after authentication and therefore the time spent in authentication is not 
> included. In addition time spent in anything before authentication (like 
> preprocessors) is not included either.
> We should change RequestLoggerFilter from a filter to an early running 
> Preprocessor. However,currently the RequestLoggerFilter has two purposes - 
> one is the logging and the other one is preparing request and response 
> objects. We need to split that functionality and keep it in the filter - 
> Preprocessors run for every http context, not just Sling so we need to avoid 
> that this code runs outside of Sling's context.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[VOTE RESULT] Release Apache Sling Engine 2.15.8

2023-11-17 Thread Carsten Ziegeler

The vote passed with five binding +1 votes

Thanks
Carsten

--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe
cziege...@apache.org


Re: [PR] SLING-12107 - JCR Repoinit executes operations out of order [sling-site]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


jsedding merged PR #143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-site/pull/143


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12115) Repoinit should leave importBehaviour for ACL creation to JCR

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Sedding closed SLING-12115.
--

> Repoinit should leave importBehaviour for ACL creation to JCR
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12115
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12115
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Repoinit
>Affects Versions: Repoinit JCR 1.1.44
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Julian Sedding
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Repoinit JCR 1.1.46
>
>
> JCR Repoinit checks the existence of the principal, for which ACLs should be 
> created. In an Oak repository, this check depends on the {{ImportBehaviour}} 
> configured for the {{SecurityProvider}}. JCR Repoinit should not check, but 
> instead rely on the repository's behaviour.
> cc [~angela]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12107) JCR Repoinit executes operations out of order

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Sedding closed SLING-12107.
--

> JCR Repoinit executes operations out of order
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12107
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12107
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Repoinit
>Affects Versions: Repoinit JCR 1.1.44
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Julian Sedding
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Repoinit JCR 1.1.46
>
>
> When applying ACLs, repoinit checks if the referenced authorizable exists, 
> and it fails if it doesn't.
> However, my goal was to set up ACLs with my deployment for a group that was 
> to be sync'ed from an {{ExternalIdentityProvider}} once the first member of 
> that group logs in.
> To work around this limitation, I tried running the following repoinit script:
> {noformat}
> create group testGroup
> set ACL for testGroup
>   allow jcr:read on /content/foo
>   deny jcr:write on /content/foo
> end
> delete group testGroup
> {noformat}
> It turned out that the statements were executed in the following order:
> {noformat}
> create group testGroup
> delete group testGroup
> set ACL for testGroup
>   allow jcr:read on /content/foo
>   deny jcr:write on /content/foo
> end
> {noformat}
> Of course that caused the script to fail just as if no group was created.
> The incorrect ordering may also cause other scenarios to fail.
> The {{ExecutionOrderTest}} suggests that some re-ordering is done on purpose. 
> E.g. namespaces and nodetypes should be created before e.g. paths are created.
> I would expect that registration of custom privileges should also be executed 
> before other operations. I don't see how that could be harmful.
> But for all other statements, I would expect the execution order to match the 
> order of the statements within the repoinit script.
> cc [~bdelacretaz], [~cziegeler], [~angela]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Closed] (SLING-12114) Update org.apache.sling.jcr.repoinit to parent pom 52

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Sedding closed SLING-12114.
--

> Update org.apache.sling.jcr.repoinit to parent pom 52
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12114
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12114
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: Repoinit
>Affects Versions: Repoinit JCR 1.1.44
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Julian Sedding
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Repoinit JCR 1.1.46
>
>
> Update to parent pom version 52, update used and remove unnecessary 
> dependencies.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-12122) Add unit-test creating group with rep:externalId property

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Sedding updated SLING-12122:
---
Fix Version/s: Repoinit JCR 1.1.48
   (was: Repoinit JCR 1.1.46)

> Add unit-test creating group with rep:externalId property
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12122
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12122
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: Repoinit
>Affects Versions: Repoinit JCR 1.1.44
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Julian Sedding
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Repoinit JCR 1.1.48
>
>
> Add a unit-test validating that repoinit can successfully create a new group 
> with the {{rep:externalId}} property, that can only be set on creation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-11621) Outdated JCR dependencies

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Sedding updated SLING-11621:
---
Fix Version/s: Repoinit JCR 1.1.48
   (was: Repoinit JCR 1.1.46)

> Outdated JCR dependencies
> -
>
> Key: SLING-11621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11621
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: Repoinit
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Repoinit JCR 1.1.48
>
>  Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-jcr-repoinit/blob/9913b787574186a7a31d184480cec3862816438f/pom.xml#L39:
> {noformat}
> 2.18.2
> 1.22.1
> {noformat}
> Jackrabbit 2.18 has been EOLd quite some time ago...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-12158) Log affected Sling Model class for messages emitted from AbstractInjectableElement

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konrad Windszus resolved SLING-12158.
-
Fix Version/s: Models Implementation 1.6.6
   Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/commit/cf088713c402177b9d96a5229567804510ef9918.

> Log affected Sling Model class for messages emitted from 
> AbstractInjectableElement
> --
>
> Key: SLING-12158
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12158
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Sling Models
>Affects Versions: Models Implementation 1.6.4
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Models Implementation 1.6.6
>
>
> Both 
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/blob/b0647a3419924c46e58b78aa6384e0f49491a0c6/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/models/impl/model/AbstractInjectableElement.java
>  and classes derived from it emit some log messages. Those log message miss 
> the context of the Sling Model class where that happens.
> This is e.g. the case in 
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/blob/b701d76cd02fcbcbb5a9470400bdf3afc803cf2c/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/models/impl/model/AbstractInjectableElement.java#L182
>  where only the type but neither the name nor the container model class is 
> emitted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12158 improve logging in InjectableElements [sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


kwin merged PR #47:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/pull/47


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Repoinit JCR 1.1.46

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding
Hi,

The vote has passed with the following result:

+1 (binding): Stefan Seifert, Carsten Ziegeler, Dan Klco, Joerg Hoh,
Julian Sedding
+1 (non-binding): none

I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.

Regards
Julian


On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:44 AM Julian Sedding  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Regards
> Julian
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:22 AM Jörg Hoh  
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Am Mo., 13. Nov. 2023 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Julian Sedding <
> > jsedd...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We solved 3 issues in this release:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310710=12352870=Text
> > >
> > > Staging repository:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2807/
> > >
> > > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > > signatures:
> > >
> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh
> > >
> > > Usage:
> > > sh check_staged_release.sh 2807 /tmp/sling-staging
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > >   [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > >   [ ]  0 Don't care
> > >   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> > >
> > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Julian
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Jörg Hoh,
> >
> > https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
> > Twitter: @joerghoh


[PR] SLING-12160 Prevent ConcurrentModificationException in [sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


kwin opened a new pull request, #107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/pull/107

   readAliasesOptimized(...)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SLING-12160) ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787141#comment-17787141
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-12160:
-

I think the easiest fix is to create a new map in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/blob/938fbfd176c58a9fb5bc5d18a37b47eb5c3c53bd/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/ResourceMapperImpl.java#L289
 before iterating.

> ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-12160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ResourceResolver
>Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.10
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> I have seen the following exception with Resource Resolver 1.7.10 triggered 
> by calling {{ResourceResolver.map(...)}}
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextNode(LinkedHashMap.java:719)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:751)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:749)
>   at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1801)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:913)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases(ResourceMapperImpl.java:249)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.loadAliasesIfApplicable(ResourceMapperImpl.java:209)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getAllMappings(ResourceMapperImpl.java:147)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getMapping(ResourceMapperImpl.java:73)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:444)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:431)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-12160) ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787139#comment-17787139
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-12160:
-

[~joerghoh] Can you maybe look a that?

> ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-12160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ResourceResolver
>Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.10
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> I have seen the following exception with Resource Resolver 1.7.10 triggered 
> by calling {{ResourceResolver.map(...)}}
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextNode(LinkedHashMap.java:719)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:751)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:749)
>   at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1801)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:913)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases(ResourceMapperImpl.java:249)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.loadAliasesIfApplicable(ResourceMapperImpl.java:209)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getAllMappings(ResourceMapperImpl.java:147)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getMapping(ResourceMapperImpl.java:73)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:444)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:431)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (SLING-12160) ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787137#comment-17787137
 ] 

Konrad Windszus edited comment on SLING-12160 at 11/17/23 11:13 AM:


I think this may happen when the {{MappingEntries}} are modified while 
iterating through 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/blob/a314ef3ce2e826bfde26493738ed94316c18bfbf/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/ResourceMapperImpl.java#L246

Even in master (although now due to refactoring in a different line) this may 
still happen in 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/blob/938fbfd176c58a9fb5bc5d18a37b47eb5c3c53bd/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/ResourceMapperImpl.java#L297.


was (Author: kwin):
I think this may happen when the {{MappingEntries}} are modified while 
iterating through 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/blob/a314ef3ce2e826bfde26493738ed94316c18bfbf/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/ResourceMapperImpl.java#L246

> ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-12160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ResourceResolver
>Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.10
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> I have seen the following exception with Resource Resolver 1.7.10 triggered 
> by calling {{ResourceResolver.map(...)}}
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextNode(LinkedHashMap.java:719)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:751)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:749)
>   at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1801)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:913)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases(ResourceMapperImpl.java:249)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.loadAliasesIfApplicable(ResourceMapperImpl.java:209)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getAllMappings(ResourceMapperImpl.java:147)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getMapping(ResourceMapperImpl.java:73)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:444)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:431)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-12160) ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17787137#comment-17787137
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-12160:
-

I think this may happen when the {{MappingEntries}} are modified while 
iterating through 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/blob/a314ef3ce2e826bfde26493738ed94316c18bfbf/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/ResourceMapperImpl.java#L246

> ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()
> ---
>
> Key: SLING-12160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ResourceResolver
>Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.10
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> I have seen the following exception with Resource Resolver 1.7.10 triggered 
> by calling {{ResourceResolver.map(...)}}
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextNode(LinkedHashMap.java:719)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:751)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:749)
>   at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1801)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:913)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
>   at 
> java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases(ResourceMapperImpl.java:249)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.loadAliasesIfApplicable(ResourceMapperImpl.java:209)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getAllMappings(ResourceMapperImpl.java:147)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getMapping(ResourceMapperImpl.java:73)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:444)
>   at 
> org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:431)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Created] (SLING-12160) ConcurrentModificationException in ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()

2023-11-17 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)
Konrad Windszus created SLING-12160:
---

 Summary: ConcurrentModificationException in 
ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases()
 Key: SLING-12160
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12160
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: ResourceResolver
Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.10
Reporter: Konrad Windszus


I have seen the following exception with Resource Resolver 1.7.10 triggered by 
calling {{ResourceResolver.map(...)}}

{code}
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at 
java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedHashIterator.nextNode(LinkedHashMap.java:719)
at 
java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:751)
at 
java.base/java.util.LinkedHashMap$LinkedEntryIterator.next(LinkedHashMap.java:749)
at java.base/java.util.Iterator.forEachRemaining(Iterator.java:133)
at 
java.base/java.util.Spliterators$IteratorSpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1801)
at 
java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:484)
at 
java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:474)
at 
java.base/java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:913)
at 
java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
at 
java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:578)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.readAliases(ResourceMapperImpl.java:249)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.loadAliasesIfApplicable(ResourceMapperImpl.java:209)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getAllMappings(ResourceMapperImpl.java:147)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.mapping.ResourceMapperImpl.getMapping(ResourceMapperImpl.java:73)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:444)
at 
org.apache.sling.resourceresolver.impl.ResourceResolverImpl.map(ResourceResolverImpl.java:431)
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


stefanseifert commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1397098919


##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@
 
 org.apache.johnzon
 johnzon-core
-1.1.1
+jakarta

Review Comment:
   started: https://lists.apache.org/thread/w640bj7d8xkw0vxt3x25dsp9shzyb44y



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Sling Johnzon Wrapper & Jakarta JSON

2023-11-17 Thread Stefan Seifert
in context of SLING-12058 we are migrating lots of modules from javax.json to 
jakarta.json. this works fine for modules using javax.json directly.

however, we have a few modules which are using johnzon, which uses javax.json 
internally. since version johnzon 1.2.5 (we are using johnzon 1.2.21 in latest 
wrapper bundle) johnzon ships an additional artifact with classifier "jakarta", 
which uses jakarta.json internally. both artifacts with and without "jakarta" 
are identical, except the internal usage of the package name. our wrapper 
bundle contains the version using javax.json.

for non-bundles like maven plugins we can just switch to the artifact with 
"jakarta". but this will not work for our bundles. we cannot ship both 
artifacts with and without "jakarta" classifier as wrapper bundles and export 
them both in OSGi with the same version number. i've found at least one bundle 
where this is already used (but not released) [1]. it stumbled about this in PR 
[2]. the bundles might work anyway as the bundle compiled against the johnzon 
"jakarta" affect should also work with the javax.json version at runtime, but 
this feels like a slippery slope.

according to [3] johnzon is using a different way starting from version 2.0 
(which seems to be released a few days ago, although the homepage is not 
updated yet): in version 2.0 johnzon uses only jakarta.json.

so it think the correct way is to create and deploy an additional wrapper 
bundle for johnzon 2.0, which we can deploy side-by-side with the old wrapper 
bundle with 1.x. i assume we have to support both of them for quite a time, as 
there is a lot of code out there using johnzon 1.x.

WDYT?

stefan

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-installer-factory-feature/blob/867bd44f0991cedd130314d833c9aac29ae3f36c/pom.xml#L134-L140
[2] https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2
[3] https://johnzon.apache.org/download.html


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Repoinit JCR 1.1.46

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding
+1

Regards
Julian

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:22 AM Jörg Hoh  wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Am Mo., 13. Nov. 2023 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Julian Sedding <
> jsedd...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 3 issues in this release:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310710=12352870=Text
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2807/
> >
> > You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the
> > signatures:
> >
> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh
> >
> > Usage:
> > sh check_staged_release.sh 2807 /tmp/sling-staging
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >   [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >   [ ]  0 Don't care
> >   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Regards
> > Julian
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jörg Hoh,
>
> https://cqdump.joerghoh.de
> Twitter: @joerghoh


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0

2023-11-17 Thread Julian Sedding
+1

Thank you Stefan!

Regards
Julian

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:10 AM Stefan Seifert
 wrote:
>
> +1
>
> stefan


Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


rombert commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1397041977


##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@
 
 org.apache.johnzon
 johnzon-core
-1.1.1
+jakarta

Review Comment:
   >  maybe we should start a discussion on this on the mailing list.
   
   I think that's a good idea 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12158 improve logging in InjectableElements [sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #47:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl/pull/47#issuecomment-1816099888

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/0-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=new_coverage=list)
 [0.0% 
Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=new_coverage=list)
  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-models-impl=47=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 52 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


stefanseifert commented on code in PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#discussion_r1396971761


##
pom.xml:
##
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@
 
 org.apache.johnzon
 johnzon-core
-1.1.1
+jakarta

Review Comment:
   i think this is not a way we ca go here. we ship johnzon in sling starter as 
part of this wrapper bundle: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-commons-johnzon - and this 
contains only the non-jakarta version. and we cannot just add the jakarta 
version as well as we cannot export two different variants of the same code 
with the same version number via OSGi.
   i think the correct way would be to switch to Johnzon 2.0 (see 
https://johnzon.apache.org/download.html, it seems to be already released 
although the documentation page is not updated yet). however, to do this we 
would need to prepare a new version of the johnzon wrapper bundle first 
including the 2.0 version range.
   and i assume that for a longer time we need to support both 1.x and 2.x 
johnzon version range, as we have a lot of modules out there relying on 1.x and 
the javax.json packages.
   maybe we should start a discussion on this on the mailing list.



##
.sling-module.json:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{

Review Comment:
   we should deviate from the default build environments for all sling modules 
only with a good reason - why do you exclude windows here, and limit the jdks 
to 11 and 17?
   if there is an issue with the build an windows, we should fix the root cause.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0

2023-11-17 Thread Stefan Seifert
+1

stefan


[VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0

2023-11-17 Thread Stefan Seifert
Hi,

We solved 5 issues in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12353545=Text=12310710

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2810/

You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify the signatures:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/master/check_staged_release.sh

Usage:
sh check_staged_release.sh 2810 /tmp/sling-staging

Please vote to approve this release:

  [ ] +1 Approve the release
  [ ]  0 Don't care
  [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.

stefan


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-12157) [osgi-mock] late binding does not work for non-service DS components

2023-11-17 Thread Stefan Seifert (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stefan Seifert updated SLING-12157:
---
Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Task)

> [osgi-mock] late binding does not work for non-service DS components 
> -
>
> Key: SLING-12157
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12157
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Testing
>Affects Versions: Testing OSGi Mock 3.3.10
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Julian Sedding
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: Testing OSGi Mock 3.4.0
>
>
> A DS component that is not a service can be "injected" and "activated", but 
> if a service becomes available, that satisfies a dynamic reference, the 
> "bind" method is not called. The same should be true for the "unbind" 
> scenario.
> I observed this when I was registering a {{ResourceDecorator}} service in a 
> test case, and it did not get bound by the 
> {{ResourceResolverFactoryActivator}} that was already registered by the 
> {{SlingContext}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


Re: [PR] SLING-12071: upgrade to sling parent 49 [sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #2:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource/pull/2#issuecomment-1815968595

   Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!  [![Quality Gate 
passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png
 'Quality Gate 
passed')](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2)
   
   
[![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png
 
'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=BUG)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=BUG)
 [0 
Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=BUG)
  
   
[![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png
 
'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=VULNERABILITY)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=VULNERABILITY)
 [0 
Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=VULNERABILITY)
  
   [![Security 
Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png
 'Security 
Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
 [0 Security 
Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT)
  
   [![Code 
Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png
 'Code 
Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=CODE_SMELL)
 
[![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png
 
'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=CODE_SMELL)
 [0 Code 
Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=false=CODE_SMELL)
   
   [![No Coverage 
information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png
 'No Coverage 
information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=coverage=list)
 No Coverage information  
   
[![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png
 
'0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
 [0.0% 
Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_sling-org-apache-sling-fsresource=2=new_duplicated_lines_density=list)
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 in /src/it/annotations-it [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] commented on PR #19:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/19#issuecomment-1815953096

   OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when 
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next 
major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this 
major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`.
   
   If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts 
on it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 in /src/it/annotations-it [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru commented on PR #19:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/19#issuecomment-1815953039

   `4.13.2` using already


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 in /src/it/annotations-it [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru closed pull request #19: Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 in 
/src/it/annotations-it
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/19


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


dependabot[bot] commented on PR #18:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/18#issuecomment-1815951731

   OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when 
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next 
major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this 
major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`.
   
   If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts 
on it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru commented on PR #18:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/18#issuecomment-1815951647

   `4.13.2` using already


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1 [sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core]

2023-11-17 Thread via GitHub


apelluru closed pull request #18: Bump junit from 4.13 to 4.13.1
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-junit-core/pull/18


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sling.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-12072) Migrate sling.junit.core to jakarta.json

2023-11-17 Thread Ashok Pelluru (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ashok Pelluru resolved SLING-12072.
---
Resolution: Fixed

> Migrate sling.junit.core to jakarta.json
> 
>
> Key: SLING-12072
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12072
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Ashok Pelluru
>Assignee: Ashok Pelluru
>Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)