Re: [DISCUSS] Should we update to the latest supported Jackrabbit Version
Robert Munteanu wrote > Hi, > > Julian raises a good about us depending on EOL Jackrabbit versions. > Although I think in practice this isn't a big deal as we mostly depend > on those versions for compilation and import range calculations, > perhaps there is a benefit in upgrading to Jackrabbit 2.4.x as a > baseline. > I see no problem with updating, however I see no real benefit either :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
[DISCUSS] Should we update to the latest supported Jackrabbit Version
Hi, Julian raises a good about us depending on EOL Jackrabbit versions. Although I think in practice this isn't a big deal as we mostly depend on those versions for compilation and import range calculations, perhaps there is a benefit in upgrading to Jackrabbit 2.4.x as a baseline. Thoughts? Robert On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 16:24 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2017-05-18 16:12, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > ... > > Nevermind, found http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/downloads#v23.htm > > l > > which means that Jackrabbit 2.4.x is the latest supported release. > > > ... > > Right. > >
