Re: [RT] Move to Oak
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 21:35 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote: On Monday 11 May 2015 20:40:51 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. +1 if we are on par with Jackrabbit, but we don't even have a release of Oak server yet - see SLING-4528. Also look into SLING-3144 [1] . Oak no longer supports the 'GroupAdmin' and 'UserAdmin' special groups, so we should deprecate support for them and make it clear that it's no longer available on Oak. Cheers, Robert [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3144 Does it mean dropping Jackrabbit completely and e.g. removing support for workspaces? Regards, O. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
Am 12.05.15 um 10:32 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Ruben Reusser r...@headwire.com wrote: ...will somebody go through all the samples/documentation when moving to oak and make sure everything still works/update the documentation?... I volunteer to do that for the samples that I care about but that's not much: just espblog, mail-archive and slingbucks. We might move the other samples under a samples/archive folder, and if someone wants to resurrect them they can be moved back. Right, I'll take care of the slingshot example (actually that one caused be to start this thread as stuff is simply missing in jackrabbit 2) Although I think the bigger problem are the docs Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
+1 Tommaso 2015-05-11 20:40 GMT+02:00 Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
+1 regards antonio On May 11, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
On Monday 11 May 2015 20:40:51 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. +1 if we are on par with Jackrabbit, but we don't even have a release of Oak server yet - see SLING-4528. Does it mean dropping Jackrabbit completely and e.g. removing support for workspaces? Regards, O. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
+1 Ian On 11 May 2015 at 19:40, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
just my 2c - will somebody go through all the samples/documentation when moving to oak and make sure everything still works/update the documentation? Ruben On 5/11/2015 12:29 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote: +1 regards antonio On May 11, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
Am 11.05.15 um 21:35 schrieb Ruben Reusser: just my 2c - will somebody go through all the samples/documentation when moving to oak and make sure everything still works/update the documentation? The goal is to do this - reality will hit us here, I'm pretty sure. However, most of this is already outdated, so we have to do that anyway. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
On Monday 11 May 2015 21:52:02 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Am 11.05.15 um 21:35 schrieb Oliver Lietz: On Monday 11 May 2015 20:40:51 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. +1 if we are on par with Jackrabbit, but we don't even have a release of Oak server yet - see SLING-4528. Does it mean dropping Jackrabbit completely and e.g. removing support for workspaces? Not sure, what you mean by this? This means not having jackrabbit in the launchpad but just Oak. This launchpad has then no support for workspaces, but if users need it they can replace it with the jackrabbit version themselves. Apart from that I don't think we have any workspace support in any other bundle. e.g. Auth, Servlets, Content Loader, WebDav, DavEx handle workspaces. Do we remove that code also in future releases or do we want to keep it? O. Carsten
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
Am 11.05.15 um 21:35 schrieb Oliver Lietz: On Monday 11 May 2015 20:40:51 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. +1 if we are on par with Jackrabbit, but we don't even have a release of Oak server yet - see SLING-4528. Does it mean dropping Jackrabbit completely and e.g. removing support for workspaces? Not sure, what you mean by this? This means not having jackrabbit in the launchpad but just Oak. This launchpad has then no support for workspaces, but if users need it they can replace it with the jackrabbit version themselves. Apart from that I don't think we have any workspace support in any other bundle. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
Am 11.05.15 um 22:08 schrieb Oliver Lietz: e.g. Auth, Servlets, Content Loader, WebDav, DavEx handle workspaces. Do we remove that code also in future releases or do we want to keep it? Ah ok, I think we already removed the support in the servlets resolver some years ago (same in resource resolver). I think we could remove this stuff over time, although there might be no real reason to do so. I assume that all of this works on Oak as long as workspaces are not used. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
Re: [RT] Move to Oak
+1 Chetan Mehrotra On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote: Am 11.05.15 um 22:08 schrieb Oliver Lietz: e.g. Auth, Servlets, Content Loader, WebDav, DavEx handle workspaces. Do we remove that code also in future releases or do we want to keep it? Ah ok, I think we already removed the support in the servlets resolver some years ago (same in resource resolver). I think we could remove this stuff over time, although there might be no real reason to do so. I assume that all of this works on Oak as long as workspaces are not used. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
[RT] Move to Oak
Hi, what about moving our launchpad completely to Oak and forget about the old jackrabbit in there? I don't think we should provide both in our launchpad in the long run. The bundles for jackrabbit are still around if someone wants to use them Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziege...@apache.org
