[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2016-08-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bertrand Delacretaz updated SLING-4365:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.12)

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Affects Versions: XSS Protection API 1.0.0
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2016-08-04 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Munteanu updated SLING-4365:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.10)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.12

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Affects Versions: XSS Protection API 1.0.0
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.12
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2016-01-25 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.8)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.10

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Affects Versions: XSS Protection API 1.0.0
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.10
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2015-10-08 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.6)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.8

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Affects Versions: XSS Protection API 1.0.0
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.8
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2015-07-29 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Affects Version/s: XSS Protection API 1.0.0

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Affects Versions: XSS Protection API 1.0.0
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.6
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2015-07-29 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.4)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.6

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.6
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2015-03-24 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.2)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.4

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.4
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (SLING-4365) Streamline ESAPI configuration

2015-03-09 Thread Radu Cotescu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Radu Cotescu updated SLING-4365:

Fix Version/s: (was: XSS Protection API 1.0.0)
   XSS Protection API 1.0.2

> Streamline ESAPI configuration
> --
>
> Key: SLING-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4365
> Project: Sling
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Extensions
>Reporter: Felix Meschberger
> Fix For: XSS Protection API 1.0.2
>
>
> Currently the ESAPI is configured using the DefaultSecurityConfiguration 
> class. This configuration is configured such as to:
>   * read configuration from various file system locations, e.g. the user's 
> home folder
>   * list the helper classes to be used
>   * configure the checking
>   * configure logging
> In our context and setup, we don't want to have different classes configured, 
> we want logging to always go through SLF4J logging and we want to limit and 
> control where the configuration is read from.
> This issues is about creating a custom SecurityConfiguration class :
>   * read from defined locations, probably one in the repository and one 
> embedded in the bundle as a fallback. For example using the same 
> configuration file as embedded default as for Sling Initial Content 
> installation in the repository.
>   * always log to SLF4J, maybe requiring an SLF4J based ESAPI LogFactory 
> implementation. As a fallback, Log4J or commons logging APIs could still be 
> used through the existing *-to-SLF4J API bridges we use.
>   * Only support configuration of validation patterns (hence all classes 
> "statically" defined)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)