Re: Making emma stuff optional?
Thanks a lot Justin! It also fixes the problem I wrote about in the other mail. I can now run the launchpad again. Best, Sandro Am 19.10.10 19:28, schrieb Justin Edelson: done in r1024330. Justin On 10/19/10 11:43 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma is created, which we don't want to release/deploy. So I think this should be turned off by default. Regards Carsten
Re: Making emma stuff optional?
done in r1024330. Justin On 10/19/10 11:43 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is > created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no > problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma > is created, which we don't want to release/deploy. > > So I think this should be turned off by default. > > Regards > Carsten
Making emma stuff optional?
Hi, can we make the emma stuff optional? Currently the file coverage.em is created in the root of each module (which is not in svn:ignore atm - no problem with that we can just add it) and an additional artifact -emma is created, which we don't want to release/deploy. So I think this should be turned off by default. Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
