Re: New i18n release and basename handling (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Starter 10 + associated testing projects and archetypes (take 2))

[Robert Munteanu]

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 15:07 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> Agreed, now with  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421  ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421> resolved and the IT
> added for this as well you could go ahead with spinning a new release
> to unblock Sling 10. We defer the baseline discussion to https://issu
> es.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7429  browse/SLING-7429>.

Sounds good to me. I'm starting the release vote for the i18n bundle.

Thanks,

Robert

Re: New i18n release and basename handling (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Starter 10 + associated testing projects and archetypes (take 2))

[Konrad Windszus]

Agreed, now with  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421 
 resolved and the IT added 
for this as well you could go ahead with spinning a new release to unblock 
Sling 10. We defer the baseline discussion to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7429 
.

> On 23. Jan 2018, at 13:28, Robert Munteanu  wrote:
> 
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 13:13 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
>> But before spinning a new release I would like to get some more
>> opinions on the basename handling of the i18n bundle in general
>> (compare with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421?focuse
>> dCommentId=16335677=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpan
>> els:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677677 > ira/browse/SLING-
>> 7421?focusedCommentId=16335677=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
>> issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677>). I think most of
>> the users might assume something else when it comes to requesting a
>> dictionary without a basename. Right now it is not possible to
>> explicitly request a value from a dictionary which is not having the
>> basename property set.
> 
> Without knowing too much about the i18n bundle, I woudl separate fixing
> the regression from properly defining the future behaviour. 
> 
> I would like to get Sling 10 out the door with the same behaviour as
> Sling 9, rather than wait even more to get better basename handling.
> After all, no one complained so far :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert

New i18n release and basename handling (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Starter 10 + associated testing projects and archetypes (take 2))

[Robert Munteanu]

Hi Konrad,

On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 13:13 +0100, Konrad Windszus wrote:
> But before spinning a new release I would like to get some more
> opinions on the basename handling of the i18n bundle in general
> (compare with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7421?focuse
> dCommentId=16335677=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpan
> els:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677677  ira/browse/SLING-
> 7421?focusedCommentId=16335677=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
> issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16335677>). I think most of
> the users might assume something else when it comes to requesting a
> dictionary without a basename. Right now it is not possible to
> explicitly request a value from a dictionary which is not having the
> basename property set.

Without knowing too much about the i18n bundle, I woudl separate fixing
the regression from properly defining the future behaviour. 

I would like to get Sling 10 out the door with the same behaviour as
Sling 9, rather than wait even more to get better basename handling.
After all, no one complained so far :-)

Thanks,

Robert