Re: RE: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
2.3.2 includes crucial changes for Python 3.7 support as well. Thanks, Jon On 2018/09/07 03:26:30, Sharanabasappa G Keriwaddi wrote: > Hi – > > Are there any blocking issues open for 2.3.2? > > 2.3.1 had few critical issues, I feel it would be better to publish 2.3.2 > with all those critical bug fixes. > > > Thanks and Regards > Sharan > > > > From: Saisai Shao [mailto:sai.sai.s...@gmail.com] > Sent: 07 September 2018 08:30 > To: 441586683 <441586...@qq.com> > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5) > > Hi, > > PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other > things. Please wait for a bit while. > > Thanks > Saisai > > > zzc <441586...@qq.com<mailto:441586...@qq.com>> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道： > Hi Saisai: > Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: > dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org> > - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
Hi – Are there any blocking issues open for 2.3.2? 2.3.1 had few critical issues, I feel it would be better to publish 2.3.2 with all those critical bug fixes. Thanks and Regards Sharan From: Saisai Shao [mailto:sai.sai.s...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 September 2018 08:30 To: 441586683 <441586...@qq.com> Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5) Hi, PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other things. Please wait for a bit while. Thanks Saisai zzc <441586...@qq.com<mailto:441586...@qq.com>> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道： Hi Saisai: Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
Hi, PMC members asked me to hold a bit while they're dealing with some other things. Please wait for a bit while. Thanks Saisai zzc <441586...@qq.com> 于2018年9月6日周四 下午4:27写道： > Hi Saisai: > Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
Hi Saisai: Spark 2.4 was cut, and is there any new process on 2.3.2? -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
Hi Any new progress ? will start RC6 soon ? Regards Liang Saisai Shao wrote > There's still another one SPARK-25114. > > I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped. > > Thanks > Saisai > > > > Wenchen Fan > cloud0fan@ > 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道： > >> SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC? >> >> SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Sean Owen > srowen@ > wrote: >> >>> (We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance >>> release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have >>> on >>> 2.3.x in general) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga > antonkulaga@ > wrote: >>> -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to be back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@.apache -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
There's still another one SPARK-25114. I will wait for several days in case some other blocks jumped. Thanks Saisai Wenchen Fan 于2018年8月15日周三 上午10:19写道： > SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC? > > SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport. > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Sean Owen wrote: > >> (We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance >> release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have on >> 2.3.x in general) >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga wrote: >> >>> -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem >>> to be >>> back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> >>>
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
SPARK-25051 is resolved, can we start a new RC? SPARK-16406 is an improvement, generally we should not backport. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Sean Owen wrote: > (We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance > release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have on > 2.3.x in general) > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga wrote: > >> -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to >> be >> back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ >> >> - >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
(We wouldn't consider lack of an improvement to block a maintenance release. It's reasonable to raise this elsewhere as a big nice to have on 2.3.x in general) On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 4:13 PM antonkulaga wrote: > -1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to > be > back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
-1 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16406 does not seem to be back-ported to 2.3.1 and it causes a lot of pain -- Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ - To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] SPARK 2.3.2 (RC5)
-1, due to SPARK-25051. It is a regression and it is a correctness bug. In 2.3.0/2.3.1 an Analysis exception was thrown, 2.2.* works fine. I cannot reproduce the issue on current master, but I was able using the prepared 2.3.2 release. Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle ore 10:04 Saisai Shao ha scritto: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.3.2. > > The vote is open until August 20 PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes > are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.2 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/ > > The tag to be voted on is v2.3.2-rc5 (commit > 4dc82259d81102e0cb48f4cb2e8075f80d899ac4): > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.3.2-rc5 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.2-rc5-bin/ > > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1281/ > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.2-rc5-docs/ > > The list of bug fixes going into 2.3.2 can be found at the following URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12343289 > > Note. RC4 was cancelled because of one blocking issue SPARK-25084 during > release preparation. > > FAQ > > = > How can I help test this release? > = > > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking > an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install > the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala > you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test > with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so > you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward). > > === > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.3.2? > === > > The current list of open tickets targeted at 2.3.2 can be found at: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target > Version/s" = 2.3.2 > > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug > fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should > be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an > appropriate release. > > == > But my bug isn't fixed? > == > > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the > release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous > release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression > that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to > help target the issue. > >
