Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread Reynold Xin
That was intentional - what's your use case that require configs not
starting with spark?


On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 8:16 AM, rfarrjr rfar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ran into an issue setting a property on the SparkConf that wasn't made
 available on the worker.  After some digging[1] I noticed that only
 properties that start with spark. are sent by the schedular.   I'm not
 sure if this was intended behavior or not.

 Using Spark Streaming 1.4.1 running on Java 8.

 ~Robert

 [1]

 https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v1.4.1/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala#L243




 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665.html
 Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org




possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread rfarrjr
Ran into an issue setting a property on the SparkConf that wasn't made
available on the worker.  After some digging[1] I noticed that only
properties that start with spark. are sent by the schedular.   I'm not
sure if this was intended behavior or not.

Using Spark Streaming 1.4.1 running on Java 8.

~Robert

[1]
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/v1.4.1/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala#L243




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org



Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread rfarrjr
That works.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665p13689.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org



Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread Reynold Xin
Is this through Java properties? For java properties, you can pass them
using spark.executor.extraJavaOptions.




On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:11 PM, rfarrjr rfar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for the response.

 In this particular case we passed a url that would be leveraged when
 configuring some serialization support for Kryo.   We are using a schema
 registry and leveraging it to efficiently serialize avro objects without
 the
 need to register specific records or schemas up front.

 Adding spark. to the property name works just didn't want to conflict
 with
 the core spark properties namespace.



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665p13686.html
 Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org




Re: possible bug: user SparkConf properties not copied to worker process

2015-08-13 Thread rfarrjr
Thanks for the response.

In this particular case we passed a url that would be leveraged when
configuring some serialization support for Kryo.   We are using a schema
registry and leveraging it to efficiently serialize avro objects without the
need to register specific records or schemas up front.

Adding spark. to the property name works just didn't want to conflict with
the core spark properties namespace.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-user-SparkConf-properties-not-copied-to-worker-process-tp13665p13686.html
Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org