Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

[Kamila Molina Orellana]

Hi all,

Rafa the idea would be use Squebi as the default Sparql Endpoint instead of
the one being used now [1]. However, Rupert point out that task would be
really short. So, I say we can add some issues too. Or what do you suggest?

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-1327

Regards,
~Kamila.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Rafa Haro  wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Can you or the student elaborate here a little bit the idea for the
> project?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:26 AM Andreas Kuckartz 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kamila and Rupert,
> >
> > Sorry for my very belated reply.
> >
> > The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that it could be
> > resolved in a GSOC-project.
> >
> > Yes, it alone would not be enough for such a project and therefore
> > significantly more work would need to be included.
> >
> > The main problem seems to be to have two mentors.
> >
> > Is there any of the other Stanbol developers who can and likes to fill
> > such a role? It would really help to support Stanbol.
> >
> > Only then should we attempt to develop the scope of the GSOC project.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andreas
> > ---
> >
> > Kamila Molina Orellana schrieb:
> > > Thanks Rupert for you answer. I understand it. I was really interested
> in
> > > Stanbol, so I guess I will keep looking at some other project for GSoC.
> > > However, If anyone is interested in mentoring, I am still looking
> forward
> > > to contribute.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > ~Kamila.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> > > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Kamila
> > >>
> > >> Stanbol has very little ongoing development - mostly fixing bugs.
> > >> While their are for sure topics of interests - especially related to
> > >> information extraction and classification - I do not know if we would
> > >> be able to find 2 Developers plan to be active enough for Mentoring.
> > >>
> > >> For me the GSoC 2018 timeline is troublesome as I will be mostly
> > >> offline in final evaluation period (6 - 21 August). So I would have a
> > >> hard time providing list minute feedback and would have a hard time to
> > >> do the final evaluation.
> > >>
> > >> best
> > >> Rupert
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana
> > >>  wrote:
> > >>> Hi Rupert.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks so much Rupert for your answer. Do you think the project will
> go
> > >> for
> > >>> GSoC? I have been looking at Squebi, and if it is too short, we can
> try
> > >> to
> > >>> fix some other issue.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> ~Kamila.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> > >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Hi Kamila,
> > 
> >  Sorry for the late response, but I wanted wait for Andreas to answer
> >  this as I do not really agree with him tagging STANBOL-1327 with
> >  GSoC2018.
> > 
> >  IMHO this would be not a good topic as it is much to simple and
> small
> >  (I would expect a maximum of 2 working days to complete this
> feature).
> >  Maybe Andreas can add some comments about his intentions when
> marking
> >  this issue with GSoC2018.
> > 
> >  best
> >  Rupert
> > 
> >  On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Kamila Molina Orellana
> >   wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been working in my proposal and wanted to make the most of
> >  bounding
> > > period by interacting with the community and the tool. I have been
> >  working
> > > in the proposal and would like to share it with my prospective
> > mentor.
> > > Anyone from Apache who would like to mentorship?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > ~Kamila.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana <
> > > kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I am interested in participating in GSOC 2018 and been looking at
> > the
> > >> issue and playing a bit with Stanbol. I am a student from the
> >  University of
> > >> Cuenca. I have been working with Semantic technologies and
> currently
> > >> in
> >  my
> > >> third year of college.
> > >>
> > >> Well just a quick overview of what I understand, please correct me
> > >> if I
> >  am
> > >> wrong. The idea will be to exchange the actual Sparql Endpoint for
> >  Squebi.
> > >> Then when you go to /sparql, you'll have Squebi functionalities,
> > >> right?
> > >>
> > >> I see you use Fremaker to build the website, OSGI to load modules.
> > >> The
> > >> actual Sparql Endpoint is loading in bundle/list.xml (
> > >> org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.sparql), but when is this file
> > >> loaded?
> > >> Where is the module that manages the Sparql Services? I mean, the
> WS
> > >> to
> > >> make updates and 

Re: Stanbol 1.0 Enhancer chain issue

[Silva, Shenal]

Hi Rafa,

I am creating a managed site

Thanx & regards,
Shenal

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Rafa Haro  wrote:

> Hi Shenal,
>
> Which kind of site were your creating? A Managed or a Referenced site?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafa
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:42 AM Silva, Shenal 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have set up the latest version (1.0) of Stanbol and created a custom
> > vocabulary as per the following document which was given in one of the
> mail
> > trails
> > https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0BxAMBxFN_NcgOVB1SFlUTTlOZ2M
> >
> > The vocabulary/ enhancer chains get created without any issue. However,
> > entities are not extracted as expected. When I try the same setup on
> > version 0.12 the entities are extracted as expected.
> >
> > Java version: Oracle JDK 8 - "1.8.0_131"
> > Tomcat Version: 7.0.85
> >
> > Am I missing anything here which is not in the document above?
> >
> > Thanx & Regards,
> > Shenal Silva
> > ᐧ
> >
>

ᐧ

Re: Stanbol 1.0 Enhancer chain issue

[Rafa Haro]

Hi Shenal,

Which kind of site were your creating? A Managed or a Referenced site?

Cheers,
Rafa

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:42 AM Silva, Shenal 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I have set up the latest version (1.0) of Stanbol and created a custom
> vocabulary as per the following document which was given in one of the mail
> trails
> https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0BxAMBxFN_NcgOVB1SFlUTTlOZ2M
>
> The vocabulary/ enhancer chains get created without any issue. However,
> entities are not extracted as expected. When I try the same setup on
> version 0.12 the entities are extracted as expected.
>
> Java version: Oracle JDK 8 - "1.8.0_131"
> Tomcat Version: 7.0.85
>
> Am I missing anything here which is not in the document above?
>
> Thanx & Regards,
> Shenal Silva
> ᐧ
>

Re: GSOC 2018 - Squebi - 1327

[Rafa Haro]

Hi Andreas,

Can you or the student elaborate here a little bit the idea for the project?

Thanks

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:26 AM Andreas Kuckartz  wrote:

> Hi Kamila and Rupert,
>
> Sorry for my very belated reply.
>
> The intention of tagging the issue with GSOC 2018 was that it could be
> resolved in a GSOC-project.
>
> Yes, it alone would not be enough for such a project and therefore
> significantly more work would need to be included.
>
> The main problem seems to be to have two mentors.
>
> Is there any of the other Stanbol developers who can and likes to fill
> such a role? It would really help to support Stanbol.
>
> Only then should we attempt to develop the scope of the GSOC project.
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
> ---
>
> Kamila Molina Orellana schrieb:
> > Thanks Rupert for you answer. I understand it. I was really interested in
> > Stanbol, so I guess I will keep looking at some other project for GSoC.
> > However, If anyone is interested in mentoring, I am still looking forward
> > to contribute.
> >
> > Regards,
> > ~Kamila.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> > rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Kamila
> >>
> >> Stanbol has very little ongoing development - mostly fixing bugs.
> >> While their are for sure topics of interests - especially related to
> >> information extraction and classification - I do not know if we would
> >> be able to find 2 Developers plan to be active enough for Mentoring.
> >>
> >> For me the GSoC 2018 timeline is troublesome as I will be mostly
> >> offline in final evaluation period (6 - 21 August). So I would have a
> >> hard time providing list minute feedback and would have a hard time to
> >> do the final evaluation.
> >>
> >> best
> >> Rupert
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana
> >>  wrote:
> >>> Hi Rupert.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks so much Rupert for your answer. Do you think the project will go
> >> for
> >>> GSoC? I have been looking at Squebi, and if it is too short, we can try
> >> to
> >>> fix some other issue.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> ~Kamila.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
> >>> rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Kamila,
> 
>  Sorry for the late response, but I wanted wait for Andreas to answer
>  this as I do not really agree with him tagging STANBOL-1327 with
>  GSoC2018.
> 
>  IMHO this would be not a good topic as it is much to simple and small
>  (I would expect a maximum of 2 working days to complete this feature).
>  Maybe Andreas can add some comments about his intentions when marking
>  this issue with GSoC2018.
> 
>  best
>  Rupert
> 
>  On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:58 AM, Kamila Molina Orellana
>   wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been working in my proposal and wanted to make the most of
>  bounding
> > period by interacting with the community and the tool. I have been
>  working
> > in the proposal and would like to share it with my prospective
> mentor.
> > Anyone from Apache who would like to mentorship?
> >
> > Regards,
> > ~Kamila.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Kamila Molina Orellana <
> > kamila.molin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am interested in participating in GSOC 2018 and been looking at
> the
> >> issue and playing a bit with Stanbol. I am a student from the
>  University of
> >> Cuenca. I have been working with Semantic technologies and currently
> >> in
>  my
> >> third year of college.
> >>
> >> Well just a quick overview of what I understand, please correct me
> >> if I
>  am
> >> wrong. The idea will be to exchange the actual Sparql Endpoint for
>  Squebi.
> >> Then when you go to /sparql, you'll have Squebi functionalities,
> >> right?
> >>
> >> I see you use Fremaker to build the website, OSGI to load modules.
> >> The
> >> actual Sparql Endpoint is loading in bundle/list.xml (
> >> org.apache.stanbol.commons.web.sparql), but when is this file
> >> loaded?
> >> Where is the module that manages the Sparql Services? I mean, the WS
> >> to
> >> make updates and select queries.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> ~Kamila.
> >>
> 
> 
> 
>  --
>  | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
>  | Bodenlehenstraße 11  ++43-699-11108907
> <+43%20699%2011108907>
>  | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>  | REDLINK.CO ..
> >> ..
>  ..
>  | http://redlink.co/
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
> >> | Bodenlehenstraße 11  ++43-699-11108907
> <+43%20699%2011108907>
> >> | A-5500