Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Govind Menon]

+1

On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik"  wrote:

+1


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone



On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li 
wrote:

+1 on this

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
>
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani 
wrote:
>>
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing <
stigdoess...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>>
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :

 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.

 Thanks,

 Bobby


> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
>
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bobby
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>>
> wrote:
>
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>>
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>>
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>>
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>>
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>>
>>> -roshan
>>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>>
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>>
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>>
 Hi devs,

 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?

 Thanks

 Julien

 --

 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*

 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 

>>>
>>
>

>>>

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Roshan Naik]

+1


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Friday, January 4, 2019, 9:02 PM, Ethan Li  wrote:

+1 on this 

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
>> 
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>> 
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
 
 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>> 
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>> 
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>> 
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>> 
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>> 
>>> -roshan
>>>  On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>> 
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
 Hi devs,
 
 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?
 
 Thanks
 
 Julien
 
 --
 
 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
 
 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[Ethan Li]

+1 on this 

Ethan Li

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 20:19, P. Taylor Goetz  wrote:
> 
> If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
>> 
>> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>>> 
 Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
 
 I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>>> hopefully,
 we can get a release out soon.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> 
> Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
 down
> on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
 JIRA.
> I am happy to let it go in.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bobby
> 
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
 stigdoess...@gmail.com
>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> regarding
>> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
 it,
>> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
>> 
>> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>>> waiting
> for
>> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
>> 
>> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
>> :
>> 
>>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
 (STORM-3290)
>> is
>>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>>> is
>>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>>> STORM-3279)
>>> appears ready to be committed ?
>>> 
>>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> seems a
>>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>>> 
>>> -roshan
>>>   On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>>> Døssing
 <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I would like to get at least
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>>> (regression) in.
>>> 
>>> I think it would be nice to also get
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
 hurry
>> they
>>> could go in the next release.
>>> 
>>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
 Hi devs,
 
 Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
 when
>> it
 could happen?
 
 Thanks
 
 Julien
 
 --
 
 *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
 
 http://www.digitalpebble.com
 http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
 #digitalpebble 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[P. Taylor Goetz]

If no one objects, I’ll kick off a release candidate.

-Taylor

> On Jan 4, 2019, at 9:06 PM, saurabh mimani  wrote:
> 
> Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?
> 
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Saurabh Kumar Mimani
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
> wrote:
> 
>> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>> 
>>> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
>>> 
>>> I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
>> hopefully,
>>> we can get a release out soon.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Bobby
>>> 
>>> 
 On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
 
 Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
>>> down
 on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
>>> JIRA.
 I am happy to let it go in.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bobby
 
 On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
>>> stigdoess...@gmail.com
> 
 wrote:
 
> I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
 regarding
> whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
>>> it,
> so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> 
> I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
>> waiting
 for
> STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> 
> Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> :
> 
>> Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>>> (STORM-3290)
> is
>> merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
>> is
>> nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
>> STORM-3279)
>> appears ready to be committed ?
>> 
>> and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
 seems a
>> bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
>> 
>> -roshan
>>On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
>> Døssing
>>> <
>> stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I would like to get at least
 https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
>> (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
>> (regression) in.
>> 
>> I think it would be nice to also get
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
>>> hurry
> they
>> could go in the next release.
>> 
>> Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
>> lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi devs,
>>> 
>>> Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
>>> when
> it
>>> could happen?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Julien
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
>>> 
>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>> #digitalpebble 
>>> 
>> 
> 
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

[saurabh mimani]

Hey, Any approximate date for 2.0 release given there are no blockers?



Best Regards

Saurabh Kumar Mimani




On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 1:13 AM Stig Rohde Døssing 
wrote:

> Looks good to me, the blockers list in JIRA is empty for 2.0.0.
>
> Den fre. 21. dec. 2018 kl. 19.52 skrev Bobby Evans :
>
> > I think all of the blockers are in now.  Please take a look and
> hopefully,
> > we can get a release out soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Bobby Evans  wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I was out at a conference for the past week, and have been heads
> > down
> > > on a different project for a while before that.  I'll respond to the
> > JIRA.
> > > I am happy to let it go in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Bobby
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:07 PM Stig Rohde Døssing <
> > stigdoess...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think STORM-2990/3279 is ready. Bobby had a question (
> > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907#discussion_r234329136)
> > > regarding
> > > > whether Kafka offsets loop, but I wasn't sure where he was going with
> > it,
> > > > so I didn't want to merge prematurely.
> > > >
> > > > I agree that we can postpone STORM-2720. As far as I know it's
> waiting
> > > for
> > > > STORM-2990 to go in, since it's going to be touching the same code.
> > > >
> > > > Den tor. 13. dec. 2018 kl. 19.54 skrev Roshan Naik
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > >  Sounds like -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > (STORM-3290)
> > > > is
> > > > > merged -  https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908 (STORM-3276)
> is
> > > > > nearly complete and may need some small tweaks. -
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907  (STORM-2990,
> STORM-3279)
> > > > > appears ready to be committed ?
> > > > >
> > > > > and- https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911   - (STORM-2720)
> > > seems a
> > > > > bit inactive and may not be critical enough to wait on.
> > > > >
> > > > > -roshan
> > > > > On Monday, November 26, 2018, 9:49:30 AM PST, Stig Rohde
> Døssing
> > <
> > > > > stigdoess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  I would like to get at least
> > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2913
> > > > > (breaking changes) and https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
> > > > > (regression) in.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be nice to also get
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2907 and
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2911 in, but if we're in a
> > hurry
> > > > they
> > > > > could go in the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Den man. 26. nov. 2018 kl. 17.37 skrev Julien Nioche <
> > > > > lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything blocking the release of Storm 2.0? Any idea of
> > when
> > > > it
> > > > > > could happen?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Julien
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > > > > > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > #digitalpebble 
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

[GitHub] storm issue #2931: STORM-3307: Fixes error time on UI for time of last error...

[kishorvpatil]

Github user kishorvpatil commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2931
  
@govind-menon  Thank you for the patch.


---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2931: STORM-3307: Fixes error time on UI for time of las...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2931


---

[GitHub] storm issue #2932: STORM-3274: Adds mock to Travis pipeline so it can run Py...

[govind-menon]

Github user govind-menon commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2932
  
@srdo Will do


---

[GitHub] storm pull request #2932: STORM-3274: Adds mock to Travis pipeline so it can...

[govind-menon]

Github user govind-menon closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2932


---

[GitHub] storm issue #2932: STORM-3274: Adds mock to Travis pipeline so it can run Py...

[srdo]

Github user srdo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2932
  
I think the build is failing because requirements.txt is being caught by 
the rat check. 

The change itself looks fine. I'm not sure it makes sense by itself though, 
maybe it should just be part of https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2930?


---