[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1075 add external module storm-cassandra

2015-11-17 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/827#discussion_r45128717
  
--- Diff: 
external/storm-cassandra/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/cassandra/Murmur3StreamGrouping.java
 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.storm.cassandra;
+
+import backtype.storm.generated.GlobalStreamId;
+import backtype.storm.grouping.CustomStreamGrouping;
+import backtype.storm.task.WorkerTopologyContext;
+import backtype.storm.topology.FailedException;
+import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
+import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
+import com.google.common.hash.Hashing;
+
+import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
+import java.io.DataOutputStream;
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.util.List;
+
+/**
+ *
+ * Simple {@link backtype.storm.grouping.CustomStreamGrouping} that uses 
Murmur3 algorithm to choose the target task of a tuple.
+ *
+ * This stream grouping may be used to optimise writes to Apache Cassandra.
+ */
+public class Murmur3StreamGrouping implements CustomStreamGrouping {
--- End diff --

Would it make sense to provide this class as part of the code module? It 
was mentioned in a [discussion on the user 
list](https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-user/201510.mbox/%3ccac19-6akwc8ch681muaq1lsfkwiofqhaffjkesfu04lpvor...@mail.gmail.com%3E)
 not long ago and it sounded like it gives better results in same cases.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1075 add external module storm-cassandra

2015-11-17 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/827#discussion_r45129715
  
--- Diff: 
external/storm-cassandra/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/cassandra/bolt/BatchCassandraWriterBolt.java
 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.storm.cassandra.bolt;
+
+import backtype.storm.Config;
+import backtype.storm.task.OutputCollector;
+import backtype.storm.task.TopologyContext;
+import backtype.storm.tuple.Tuple;
+import backtype.storm.utils.Time;
+import com.datastax.driver.core.Statement;
+import org.apache.storm.cassandra.executor.AsyncResultHandler;
+import org.apache.storm.cassandra.executor.impl.BatchAsyncResultHandler;
+import org.apache.storm.cassandra.query.CQLStatementTupleMapper;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
+
+public class BatchCassandraWriterBolt extends 
BaseCassandraBolt> {
+
+private final static Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(BatchCassandraWriterBolt.class);
+
+public static final int DEFAULT_EMIT_FREQUENCY = 2;
+
+private static final int QUEUE_MAX_SIZE = 1000;
+
+private LinkedBlockingQueue queue;
+
+private int tickFrequencyInSeconds;
+
+private long lastModifiedTimesMillis;
+
+private String componentID;
+
+private AsyncResultHandler> asyncResultHandler;
+
+/**
+ * Creates a new {@link CassandraWriterBolt} instance.
+ *
+ * @param tupleMapper
+ */
+public BatchCassandraWriterBolt(CQLStatementTupleMapper tupleMapper) {
+this(tupleMapper, DEFAULT_EMIT_FREQUENCY);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Creates a new {@link CassandraWriterBolt} instance.
+ *
+ * @param tupleMapper
+ */
+public BatchCassandraWriterBolt(CQLStatementTupleMapper tupleMapper, 
int tickFrequencyInSeconds) {
+super(tupleMapper);
+this.tickFrequencyInSeconds = tickFrequencyInSeconds;
+}
+/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ */
+@Override
+public void prepare(Map stormConfig, TopologyContext topologyContext, 
OutputCollector outputCollector) {
+super.prepare(stormConfig, topologyContext, outputCollector);
+this.componentID = topologyContext.getThisComponentId();
+this.queue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<>(QUEUE_MAX_SIZE);
+this.lastModifiedTimesMillis = now();
+}
+
+@Override
+protected AsyncResultHandler> getAsyncHandler() {
+if( asyncResultHandler == null) {
+asyncResultHandler = new 
BatchAsyncResultHandler(getResultHandler());
+}
+return asyncResultHandler;
+}
+
+/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ */
+@Override
+protected void process(Tuple input) {
+if( ! queue.offer(input) ) {
+LOG.info(logPrefix() + "The message queue is full, preparing 
batch statement...");
+prepareAndExecuteStatement();
+queue.add(input);
+}
+}
+/**
+ * {@inheritDoc}
+ */
+@Override
+protected void tick() {
+prepareAndExecuteStatement();
+}
+
+public void prepareAndExecuteStatement() {
+int size = queue.size();
+if( size > 0 ) {
+List inputs = new ArrayList<>(size);
+queue.drainTo(inputs);
+try {
+List psl = buildStatement(inputs);
+
+int sinceLastModified = 
updateAndGetSecondsSinceLastModified();
+LOG.debug(logPrefix() + String.format("Exec

[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1075 add external module storm-cassandra

2015-11-17 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/827#discussion_r45130329
  
--- Diff: 
external/storm-cassandra/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/cassandra/client/CassandraConf.java
 ---
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.storm.cassandra.client;
+
+import com.datastax.driver.core.ConsistencyLevel;
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+
+import java.io.Serializable;
+import java.util.Map;
+
+/**
+ * Configuration used by cassandra storm components.
+ */
+public class CassandraConf implements Serializable {
+
+public static final String CASSANDRA_USERNAME   = 
"cassandra.username";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_PASSWORD   = 
"cassandra.password";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_KEYSPACE   = 
"cassandra.keyspace";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_CONSISTENCY_LEVEL  = 
"cassandra.output.consistencyLevel";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_NODES  = 
"cassandra.nodes";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_PORT   = 
"cassandra.port";
+public static final String CASSANDRA_BATCH_SIZE_ROWS= 
"cassandra.batch.size.rows";
+
+/**
+ * The authorized cassandra username.
+ */
+private String username;
+/**
+ * The authorized cassandra password
+ */
+private String password;
+/**
+ * The cassandra keyspace.
+ */
+private String keyspace;
+/**
+ * List of contacts nodes.
+ */
+private String[] nodes = {"localhost"};
+
+/**
+ * The port used to connect to nodes.
+ */
+private int port = 9092;
+
+/**
+ * Consistency level used to write statements.
+ */
+private ConsistencyLevel consistencyLevel = ConsistencyLevel.ONE;
+/**
+ * The maximal numbers of rows per batch.
+ */
+private int batchSizeRows   = 100;
+
+/**
+ * Creates a new {@link CassandraConf} instance.
+ */
+public CassandraConf() {
+super();
+}
+
+/**
+ * Creates a new {@link CassandraConf} instance.
+ *
+ * @param conf The storm configuration.
+ */
+public CassandraConf(Map conf) {
+this.username = getOrElse(conf, CASSANDRA_USERNAME, null);
+this.password = getOrElse(conf, CASSANDRA_PASSWORD, null);
+this.keyspace = get(conf, CASSANDRA_KEYSPACE);
+this.consistencyLevel = ConsistencyLevel.valueOf(getOrElse(conf, 
CASSANDRA_CONSISTENCY_LEVEL, ConsistencyLevel.ONE.name()));
+this.nodes= getOrElse(conf, CASSANDRA_NODES, 
"localhost").split(",");
+this.batchSizeRows = getOrElse(conf, CASSANDRA_BATCH_SIZE_ROWS, 
100);
+this.port = conf.get(CASSANDRA_PORT) != null ? 
Integer.valueOf((String)conf.get(CASSANDRA_PORT)) : 9042;
+}
+
+public String getUsername() {
+return username;
+}
+
+public String getPassword() {
+return password;
+}
+
+public String getKeyspace() {
+return keyspace;
+}
+
+public String[] getNodes() {
+return nodes;
+}
+
+public ConsistencyLevel getConsistencyLevel() {
+return consistencyLevel;
+}
+
+public int getBatchSizeRows() {
+return batchSizeRows;
+}
+
+public int getPort() {
+return this.port;
+}
+
+private  T get(Map conf, String key) {
+Object o = conf.get(key);
+if(o == null) {
+throw new IllegalArgumentException("No '" + key + "' value 
found in configur

[GitHub] storm pull request: storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and c...

2016-02-18 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122

storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and closeOutputFile methods to 
protected

When extending HdfsBolt it can be useful to be able to override the methods 
createOutputFile() or closeOutputFile(), for instance to add a header or footer 
to the files created. This is currently not possible when the class is outside 
the `org.apache.storm.hdfs.bolt` package. This patch makes it possible.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1122


commit bcb40e481f189cc9f77ddcaeddf7d4daa556113b
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2016-02-18T16:25:40Z

storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and closeOutputFile methods to 
protected




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and c...

2016-02-19 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122#issuecomment-186435209
  
@dossett good idea - I have just committed your suggestion
@revans2 and @ptgoetz \: will the content of the master branch become 2.x 
and if so could this  be committed to the next 1.x release?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and c...

2016-02-20 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122#issuecomment-186561314
  
@ptgoetz perfect, thanks. BTW I really like the HDFS module, great work! 
Would be good to have compression for HdfsBolt, I might have a go at 
implementing that.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Update doc for rebalance command

2016-02-20 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1130

Update doc for rebalance command

Trivial update for the rebalance command - now similar to the output of 
'storm help rebalance'

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm asf-site

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1130.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1130


commit e9eb307dac90a4fae40113235a006ffb2e81d383
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2016-02-20T21:10:48Z

Update doc for rebalance command




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and c...

2016-02-25 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122#issuecomment-188872715
  
Anything blocking this from being committed (apart from committers' 
availability)?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: storm-hdfs : change visibility of create and c...

2016-02-25 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1122#issuecomment-188994648
  
thanks for having taken the time to do it @revans2, much appreciated


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Update doc for rebalance command

2016-03-15 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1130#issuecomment-196814390
  
Sorry for bumping it, but it is a trivial commit and I think it would be 
good to update the doc - especially prior to the new releases. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer on bran...

2016-03-18 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1222

Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer on branch 0.10.x STORM-584

Port of #1221 to branch 0.10

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm 0.10.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1222.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1222


commit db5fbbde84e456de4594edf0a28e8982b5d00f12
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2016-03-16T11:22:52Z

Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer on branch 0.10.x STORM-584




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer STORM-5...

2016-03-19 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1221

Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer STORM-584

Currently the metrics.log file is always empty and it declared in the 
cluster.xml file whereas it should be in the worker one. The metrics end up in 
the log file which is not a huge issue but it would be cleaner to have them in 
a separate file, as originally intended. 

This patch addresses this and makes so that there is one metrics file per 
worker, as per the other log files, which should address the issues mentioned 
in [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-584].

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm metricsFile

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1221.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1221


commit 4d75ec8494eeda24d6510641259d4c469cff3ee2
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2016-03-16T11:14:24Z

Fix logging for LoggingMetricsConsumer STORM-584




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1466: Update worker.xml

2016-06-07 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1466
  
+1


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Fixed incubator URLs

2015-10-29 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828

Fixed incubator URLs

Replaces links to 'storm.incubator.apache.org' with 'storm.apache.org' and 
'github.com/apache/incubator-storm' with 'github.com/apache/storm'

This also removes the DISCLAIMER file now that the project has become top 
level.



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #828


commit acca57205c731a48b5285bfe85c5ea55e6222108
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2015-10-29T12:37:18Z

Fixed incubation URLs




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: Fixed incubator URLs

2015-10-29 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828#issuecomment-152205114
  
thanks for your comments @kishorvpatil 
This particular document is outdated - instead of searching for the 
relevant line in the master branch I fixed the URLs by pointing them to the 
branch 0.7.1 which was relevant at the time this document was written. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-1148 - Removed references to incubator i...

2015-11-04 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/853#issuecomment-153671366
  
Duplicates [https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/828]


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1896: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j

2017-01-26 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1896

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j

Ran ` mvn clean install -DskipTests` without problems

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm STORM-2326

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1896.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1896


commit 5f9bffbbb15f9964612b48e91db9b24c710a251b
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-01-26T12:23:35Z

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1896: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j

2017-01-26 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1896
  
As far as I understand, Storm uses SLF4J + LOG4J. I could not find a way to 
run a topology where one of the dependencies relies on a more recent version of 
log4j (Elasticsearch 5). A similar problem was reported on 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1386.
Upgrading the dependencies in Storm solved the problem.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1900: Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch ...

2017-01-27 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1900

Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch 1.0.x

See #1896 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm STORM-2326-2

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1900.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1900


commit b1258a486194332a7dfa79ba3dbda64365811634
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-01-27T11:39:51Z

Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch 1.0.x




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1900: Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch ...

2017-01-27 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1900


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1900: Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch 1.0.x

2017-01-27 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1900
  
Needs more work. I am getting the following in supervisor.log

```
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd:Exception in thread "main" 
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.ThreadContextAccess.getThreadContextMap(ThreadContextAccess.java:45)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.ContextDataInjectorFactory.createDefaultInjector(ContextDataInjectorFactory.java:83)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.ContextDataInjectorFactory.createInjector(ContextDataInjectorFactory.java:67)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.lookup.ContextMapLookup.(ContextMapLookup.java:34)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.lookup.Interpolator.(Interpolator.java:116)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.AbstractConfiguration.(AbstractConfiguration.java:120)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config.NullConfiguration.(NullConfiguration.java:32)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.(LoggerContext.java:72)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.788 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.selector.BasicContextSelector.(BasicContextSelector.java:32)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:423)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.util.LoaderUtil.newInstanceOf(LoaderUtil.java:158)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.util.LoaderUtil.newInstanceOf(LoaderUtil.java:180)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.util.LoaderUtil.newCheckedInstanceOf(LoaderUtil.java:201)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.util.LoaderUtil.newCheckedInstanceOfProperty(LoaderUtil.java:226)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.createContextSelector(Log4jContextFactory.java:97)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.(Log4jContextFactory.java:58)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a21163fd: at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
2017-01-27 11:45:55.789 Thread-12 o.a.s.u.Utils [INFO] Worker Process 
9318e633-f5fc-476f-825c-2f68a2

[GitHub] storm pull request #1896: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j

2017-01-27 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1896


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1896: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j

2017-01-27 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1896
  
See issue with #1900 - closing for now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1897: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-30 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1897
  
Thanks @HeartSaVioR. Good idea, I'll have a look at the topology classes in 
storm-starter. Just came across the 
(StormRunner)[https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/examples/storm-starter/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/starter/util/StormRunner.java]
 class, which the ConfigurableTopology could replace.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1897: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1897
  
@HeartSaVioR I removed StormRunner and modified some of the topologies so 
that they extend ConfigurableTopology. Please let me know your thoughts on this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1897: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1897#discussion_r98649259
  
--- Diff: 
examples/storm-starter/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/starter/RollingTopWords.java ---
@@ -17,114 +17,89 @@
  */
 package org.apache.storm.starter;
 
-import org.apache.storm.Config;
-import org.apache.storm.testing.TestWordSpout;
-import org.apache.storm.topology.TopologyBuilder;
-import org.apache.storm.tuple.Fields;
-import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
 import org.apache.storm.starter.bolt.IntermediateRankingsBolt;
 import org.apache.storm.starter.bolt.RollingCountBolt;
 import org.apache.storm.starter.bolt.TotalRankingsBolt;
-import org.apache.storm.starter.util.StormRunner;
+import org.apache.storm.testing.TestWordSpout;
+import org.apache.storm.topology.ConfigurableTopology;
+import org.apache.storm.topology.TopologyBuilder;
+import org.apache.storm.tuple.Fields;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
 
 /**
- * This topology does a continuous computation of the top N words that the 
topology has seen in terms of cardinality.
- * The top N computation is done in a completely scalable way, and a 
similar approach could be used to compute things
- * like trending topics or trending images on Twitter.
+ * This topology does a continuous computation of the top N words that the
+ * topology has seen in terms of cardinality. The top N computation is 
done in a
+ * completely scalable way, and a similar approach could be used to compute
+ * things like trending topics or trending images on Twitter.
  */
-public class RollingTopWords {
+public class RollingTopWords extends ConfigurableTopology {
 
-  private static final Logger LOG = 
Logger.getLogger(RollingTopWords.class);
-  private static final int DEFAULT_RUNTIME_IN_SECONDS = 60;
+  private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(RollingTopWords.class);
   private static final int TOP_N = 5;
 
-  private final TopologyBuilder builder;
-  private final String topologyName;
-  private final Config topologyConfig;
-  private final int runtimeInSeconds;
-
-  public RollingTopWords(String topologyName) throws InterruptedException {
-builder = new TopologyBuilder();
-this.topologyName = topologyName;
-topologyConfig = createTopologyConfiguration();
-runtimeInSeconds = DEFAULT_RUNTIME_IN_SECONDS;
-
-wireTopology();
-  }
-
-  private static Config createTopologyConfiguration() {
-Config conf = new Config();
-conf.setDebug(true);
-return conf;
-  }
-
-  private void wireTopology() throws InterruptedException {
-String spoutId = "wordGenerator";
-String counterId = "counter";
-String intermediateRankerId = "intermediateRanker";
-String totalRankerId = "finalRanker";
-builder.setSpout(spoutId, new TestWordSpout(), 5);
-builder.setBolt(counterId, new RollingCountBolt(9, 3), 
4).fieldsGrouping(spoutId, new Fields("word"));
-builder.setBolt(intermediateRankerId, new 
IntermediateRankingsBolt(TOP_N), 4).fieldsGrouping(counterId, new Fields(
-"obj"));
-builder.setBolt(totalRankerId, new 
TotalRankingsBolt(TOP_N)).globalGrouping(intermediateRankerId);
-  }
-
-  public void runLocally() throws InterruptedException {
-StormRunner.runTopologyLocally(builder.createTopology(), topologyName, 
topologyConfig, runtimeInSeconds);
+  private RollingTopWords() {
   }
 
-  public void runRemotely() throws Exception {
-StormRunner.runTopologyRemotely(builder.createTopology(), 
topologyName, topologyConfig);
+  public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
+ConfigurableTopology.start(new RollingTopWords(), args);
   }
 
   /**
* Submits (runs) the topology.
*
-   * Usage: "RollingTopWords [topology-name] [local|remote]"
+   * Usage: "RollingTopWords [topology-name] [-local]"
*
-   * By default, the topology is run locally under the name 
"slidingWindowCounts".
+   * By default, the topology is run locally under the name
+   * "slidingWindowCounts".
*
* Examples:
*
* ```
*
-   * # Runs in local mode (LocalCluster), with topology name 
"slidingWindowCounts"
-   * $ storm jar storm-starter-jar-with-dependencies.jar 
org.apache.storm.starter.RollingTopWords
+   * # Runs in local mode (LocalCluster), with topology name
+   * "slidingWindowCounts" $ storm jar 
storm-starter-jar-with-dependencies.jar
--- End diff --

done!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this 

[GitHub] storm pull request #1907: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-31 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1907

STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

Squashed #1897 into a single commit.

@HeartSaVioR

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm STORM-2327-2

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1907.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1907


commit 8685807b9a9c77dad3ecb8507e985906bce974b5
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-01-26T14:44:01Z

STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1897: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1897


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1897: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-01-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1897
  
I made a mess with this branch and have pushed a clean, squashed PR as a 
replacement -> #1907 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1907: STORM-2327 ConfigurableTopology

2017-02-02 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1907
  
Thanks @HeartSaVioR 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #1900: Port STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j to branch 1.0.x

2017-02-20 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1900
  
FYI this is fixed in the following version of log4j, see 
https://blogs.apache.org/logging/entry/log4j-2-8-released. 
I will test with 2.8 and open a new PR


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1946: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 1.0....

2017-02-20 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1946

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 1.0.x

Compiled and packaged with

```
mvn clean install -DskipTests=true
cd storm-dist/binary && mvn package
```

Works fine in both local and deployed mode.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm STORM-2326

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1946.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1946


commit 7159a1930f0b46d04e777a195f2239efe99c00ec
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-02-20T17:22:55Z

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1947: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 1.x

2017-02-20 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1947

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 1.x

See #1946 for 1.0.x equivalent



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm STORM-2326-1.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1947.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1947


commit 593d523f874b70ceddcf67fe5dd4fa9af6c8436b
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-02-20T17:32:06Z

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #1969: STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 2.x

2017-02-27 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1969

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j for branch 2.x

See #1946 for 1.0.x equivalent

` mvn clean install -DskipTests=true` ran without problems


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/DigitalPebble/storm STORM-2326-2.x

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1969.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1969


commit 71195780e872b45f592c5d30b87626852bd71d3e
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2017-02-27T11:31:47Z

STORM-2326 Upgrade log4j and slf4j




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm issue #2258: addition of isDebugEnabled() check to improve the perform...

2017-08-03 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2258
  
-1 
Why not simply use parameterized messages instead? See 
https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2607: STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if ...

2018-03-27 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2607

STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if $JAVA_HOME  is undefined



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm 1.x-branch

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2607.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2607


commit f2535dfb6ecbb1416c9527c0ce17a5e7818e5198
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2018-03-27T13:42:28Z

STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if 
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle is undefined




---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2609: STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if ...

2018-03-28 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2609

STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if JAVA_HOME is undefined

port of #2607 to master branch

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2609.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2609


commit 15a5757a6109f0840861a5004763b8611864b26c
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2018-03-28T07:54:42Z

STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if JAVA_HOME is undefined




---


[GitHub] storm issue #2607: STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if $JAVA_H...

2018-03-28 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2607
  
thanks, see #2609 


---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2607: STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if ...

2018-03-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2607


---


[GitHub] storm issue #2607: STORM-3011 Use default bin path in flight.bash if $JAVA_H...

2018-03-31 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2607
  
thanks @revans2 


---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2897: bugfix ConfigurableTopology completely overwrites ...

2018-10-26 Thread jnioche
GitHub user jnioche opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2897

bugfix ConfigurableTopology completely overwrites preexisting config

The ConfigurableTopology can take configuration files where the values are 
put under a single config element to be compatible with Flux. This PR fixes a 
bug when multiple configs are set, the last one will overwrite any preexisting 
value as everything is put under the same key 'config'

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/jnioche/storm master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2897.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #2897


commit a88e4491c39e7dded5a16974ed2fcacc33892ae7
Author: Julien Nioche 
Date:   2018-10-26T15:41:03Z

bugfix ConfigurableTopology completely overwrites preexisting config




---


[GitHub] storm issue #2908: STORM-3276: Updated Flux to deal with storm local correct...

2018-11-16 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908
  
Tested on a StormCrawler topology, works fine in local and remote mode.
one quick question though: shouldn't --sleep be deprecated? --local-ttl is 
used for all the local jobs instead 


---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2908: STORM-3276: Updated Flux to deal with storm local ...

2018-11-28 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908#discussion_r237004334
  
--- Diff: flux/flux-core/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/flux/Flux.java ---
@@ -52,17 +52,22 @@
 public class Flux {
 private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Flux.class);
 
+@Deprecated
--- End diff --

IMHO this it is acceptable for a major release.  Projects need a drastic 
cleanup once in a while.


---


[GitHub] storm pull request #2908: STORM-3276: Updated Flux to deal with storm local ...

2018-11-28 Thread jnioche
Github user jnioche commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2908#discussion_r237006771
  
--- Diff: flux/flux-core/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/flux/Flux.java ---
@@ -52,17 +52,22 @@
 public class Flux {
 private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Flux.class);
 
+@Deprecated
--- End diff --

Got you! Your comment was pretty clear, I just need another coffee :-)


---